Logo Logo
/// 
Objektive, Konverter hoher Qualität für meine Sony HDR-SR11E gesucht

Lenses, high-quality converter for my SonyHDR sought-SR11E



Frage von Moritzk:
Februar 2009

Good evening Dear forums members,

I want from my camcorder to the consumer SonyHDR-SR11E to get more for attractive, high-quality recordings in the wide, telephoto, and Fish-Eye to make them.
Currently, I own several already Lenses that I recently bought on Ebay. For this I have total ungefair 100 ¬ spent.
Only the quality of these Lenses are really the full match, usually the edges are blurred, or pale colors.
Now I have the nose full of this Miess quality and now wants me to buy better-quality Lenses.
Here I ask you for a purchase recommendation, and a Council.

I'd like to say how wide-angle, telephoto and various other Lenses / Converter for more from my camera here.
It should of course, the quality of the AVCHD Recording maintained.
What I would like to spend s.Money I can not say at the moment. A real border there is not. I would just simply good quality because I had enough of all the garbage at Ebay.

Many greetings, and thanks in advance,

Moritzk.



Antwort von B.DeKid:

http://www.raynox.co.jp/german/index.htm

;-)



Antwort von Moritzk:

"B. DeKid" wrote:
http://www.raynox.co.jp/german/index.htm

;-)


Thank you very much,

on this Page, I was actually synonymous already, only I was not sure whether this quality for a good is synonymous.
Also can I find on this page, no prices, and no ordering.








Antwort von B.DeKid:

Quail is on top - otherwise you would not empfeheln ;-)

D Land Sales is http://www.hapa-team.de/

The call and ask or ne email.

MfG
B. DeKid

PS: For 100 euros buys you maybe UV filter ;-) but no lens / adapter;-P



Antwort von Moritzk:

"B. DeKid" wrote:
Quail is on top - otherwise you would not empfeheln ;-)

D Land Sales is http://www.hapa-team.de/

The call and ask or ne email.

MfG
B. DeKid

PS: For 100 euros buys you maybe UV filter ;-) but no lens / adapter;-P


Okay, super .... I thank you.



Antwort von Moritzk:

Is there a synonymous of someone SonyHDR-SR11E has, and this somewhat synonymous has tuned?

Is there actually a kind of support for a tripod when I get a "HDP-7700ES" of Raynox've attached?

http://www.raynox.co.jp/german/video/hdrsr12/index.html



Antwort von Bernd E.:

"Moritzk" wrote:
... Is there really a kind of support for a tripod when I get a "HDP-7700ES" of Raynox've attached? ...

The relatively low weight of this intent, the filter thread already still cope without help.



Antwort von Moritzk:

"Bernd E." wrote:
"Moritzk" wrote:
... Is there really a kind of support for a tripod when I get a "HDP-7700ES" of Raynox've attached? ...

The relatively low weight of this intent, the filter thread already still cope without help.


But it is not wrong to shift the weight Tripod come, and lead to blurred pictures?
Would not this frame s.besten for me? See Still Image.



Antwort von Moritzk:

So now I have the following Lenses for my SonyHDR-SR11E selected.

Wide: Raynox HD 5050Pro
Fish-Eye: Raynox HD-3032Pro
Tele: Raynox HD 2200Pro

What is your opinion on these lenses? Will I finally erhofte quality?
Should I still Lenses or filter most?
Bin for each Council and each tip grateful.

Greetings of MoritzK



Antwort von Moritzk:

"Moritzk" wrote:
So now I have the following Lenses for my SonyHDR-SR11E selected.

Wide: Raynox HD 5050Pro
Fish-Eye: Raynox HD-3032Pro
Tele: Raynox HD 2200Pro

What is your opinion on these lenses? Will I finally erhofte quality?
Should I still Lenses or filter most?
Bin for each Council and each tip grateful.

Greetings of MoritzK


No opinions? Bad :-(



Antwort von B.DeKid:

Gude

The picture shown of you shows a 35mm adapter.

This course is recommended support.

If I s.den EF telephoto lens adapter Canon XL1S screw then use I share a Monopod for additional supports.

Your concerns regarding the Raynox adapter but I can see as unfounded as they are not with a "3-5" kilo Tele like it, I've sometimes been used to compare.

The weight distribution on the tripod but it is a legitimate question / thought.
One can see that you can more than just sausage cook ;-)

Ne times do not head that should easily fit.

MfG
B. DeKid

PS: Geiles Design in plexi so I must say hat was ;-)



Antwort von domain:

You only buy Century-Converter here, or maybe of the Schneider Kreuznach (4-Linser)
http://www.digitalkamera-land.de/digitalkameras/kodak-schneider-kreuznach-xenar-07x-kaufen-P74822-C1_15_141.html
StepUp with a ring 37-55 mm.








Antwort von Moritzk:

"B. DeKid" wrote:
Gude

The picture shown of you shows a 35mm adapter.

This course is recommended support.

If I s.den EF telephoto lens adapter Canon XL1S screw then use I share a Monopod for additional supports.

Your concerns regarding the Raynox adapter but I can see as unfounded as they are not with a "3-5" kilo Tele like it, I've sometimes been used to compare.

The weight distribution on the tripod but it is a legitimate question / thought.
One can see that you can more than just sausage cook ;-)

Ne times do not head that should easily fit.

MfG
B. DeKid

PS: Geiles Design in plexi so I must say hat was ;-)


Yes yes believe it or not, I can do more than just sausage roast :-) Do you have at the next follow-looking, these will be online soon :-)... hab your tips into account and will ensure as soon no longer synonymous joined the Camera.

So now back to the topic.
So should I now buy Raynox Lenses of? Or is the quality not as good as the reputation of the manufacturer?

What is it with the tip of domain, is the correct?

Regards



Antwort von B.DeKid:

"Moritzk" wrote:
:-)...'ve taken into account and your tips will surely synonymous as soon no longer enter the camera.

..... Or is the quality not as good as the reputation of the manufacturer?

What is it with the tip of domain, is the correct?



Oh, how, why - I found the clip ok.

Can I have nothing to say, but domain has actually already know.

But you know Yes - you can always buy better, months and are looking to wait for newer models - only the quality is not synonymous better.

MfG
B. DeKid



Antwort von Moritzk:

"B. DeKid" wrote:
"Moritzk" wrote:
:-)...'ve taken into account and your tips will surely synonymous as soon no longer enter the camera.

..... Or is the quality not as good as the reputation of the manufacturer?

What is it with the tip of domain, is the correct?



Oh, how, why - I found the clip ok.

Can I have nothing to say, but domain has actually already know.

But you know Yes - you can always buy better, months and are looking to wait for newer models - only the quality is not synonymous better.

MfG
B. DeKid


Really? Because you are one of the few :-)
Then you could have on the next follow-looking, would be sure of this or next week online.

So I think the quality of Raynox probably will be significantly better than in my Ebay Model ... So I expect that at least.
My approximately 350 ¬ for 3 Lenses, are a hobby for a lot of filmmakers Money.



Antwort von RickyMartini:

"Moritzk" wrote:
"B. DeKid" wrote:
"Moritzk" wrote:
:-)...'ve taken into account and your tips will surely synonymous as soon no longer enter the camera.

..... Or is the quality not as good as the reputation of the manufacturer?

What is it with the tip of domain, is the correct?



Oh, how, why - I found the clip ok.

Can I have nothing to say, but domain has actually already know.

But you know Yes - you can always buy better, months and are looking to wait for newer models - only the quality is not synonymous better.

MfG
B. DeKid


Really? Because you are one of the few :-)
Then you could have on the next follow-looking, would be sure of this or next week online.

So I think the quality of Raynox probably will be significantly better than in my Ebay Model ... So I expect that at least.
My approximately 350 ¬ for 3 Lenses, are a hobby for a lot of filmmakers Money.

Lenses with three for 350 ¬ in turn, appear quite favorable! ;)
For a 0.7 x SonyWW I had 199 ¬ alone gelöhnt.
In his hobby is, however, not infrequently much money.

When (D) SLR is one fast even at 500 ¬ + with it.



Antwort von Moritzk:

"RickyMartini" wrote:
"Moritzk" wrote:
"B. DeKid" wrote:
"Moritzk" wrote:
:-)...'ve taken into account and your tips will surely synonymous as soon no longer enter the camera.

..... Or is the quality not as good as the reputation of the manufacturer?

What is it with the tip of domain, is the correct?



Oh, how, why - I found the clip ok.

Can I have nothing to say, but domain has actually already know.

But you know Yes - you can always buy better, months and are looking to wait for newer models - only the quality is not synonymous better.

MfG
B. DeKid


Really? Because you are one of the few :-)
Then you could have on the next follow-looking, would be sure of this or next week online.

So I think the quality of Raynox probably will be significantly better than in my Ebay Model ... So I expect that at least.
My approximately 350 ¬ for 3 Lenses, are a hobby for a lot of filmmakers Money.

Lenses with three for 350 ¬ in turn, appear quite favorable! ;)
For a 0.7 x SonyWW I had 199 ¬ alone gelöhnt.
In his hobby is, however, not infrequently much money.

When (D) SLR is one fast even at 500 ¬ + with it.


Yes there are certainly clear synonymous much, much more expensive, but I now have empfollen (see above) are responsible for about 350 ¬ Total zuhaben. And what if None of the negative lenses of Raynox says, then I think I will let me make sure this month ... must :-)

And I just worry that my Lenses Hd good quality can not begin, or even the edges are smudged and blurred. That is the case with my current cheap fisheye for 39,95 ¬ of Ebay.



Antwort von RickyMartini:

Your concerns, I can perfectly understand! I just wish that the very good HD quality by inferior optics is downright dirty.

When I in 2002 for my SonyDCR-PC101E looking for a WW, I could SonyWW standard with the High Grade directly compare and I was obviously more expensive for the HG GOAL!

At the other there was strong WW Randunschärfen - brrrrrrrrrr!

Small Camera - Optics thick. : D



Antwort von Moritzk:

"RickyMartini" wrote:
Your concerns, I can perfectly understand! I just wish that the very good HD quality by inferior optics is downright dirty.

When I in 2002 for my SonyDCR-PC101E looking for a WW, I could SonyWW standard with the High Grade directly compare and I was obviously more expensive for the HG GOAL!

At the other there was strong WW Randunschärfen - brrrrrrrrrr!

Small Camera - Optics thick. : D


And that is exactly what I would like to avoid.

But as far as I am aware, has in the Raynox HD Series yes especially on the high definition specialized area.
None of the bad experience with a Raynox Lens can tell.



Antwort von domain:

I was trying the Raynox HD-3032PRO. Reported strong, but I knew beforehand and it was sufficiently sharp to the corners.
It applies the following rule of thumb: Wide prefixes, which may be recorded need not be strongly resolved (2 Lens), s.Rand are usually still quite sharp and inexpensive.
Everything almost exactly reversed with little or no record of intentions (3-4 lenses)



Antwort von Moritzk:

"domain" wrote:
I was trying the Raynox HD-3032PRO. Reported strong, but I knew beforehand and it was sufficiently sharp to the corners.
It applies the following rule of thumb: Wide prefixes, which may be recorded need not be strongly resolved (2 Lens), s.Rand are usually still quite sharp and inexpensive.
Everything almost exactly reversed with little or no record of intentions (3-4 lenses)


What this means is strongly Listed? Is that good or bad?








Antwort von domain:

It is a matter of taste whether a fish-eye a certain effect like it or not. This shows an intent already strong curvature of the lines s.Rand, but synonymous delivers a huge angle.
In general, I recommend not so considerable and wide intentions further more the original intentions of the manufacturer (up to max. 0.5). These are for the corresponding Zoomobjekte precisely tuned and you rarely hear about them Kritk.
Televosätze but you can ever give my opinion.



Antwort von Moritzk:

"domain" wrote:
It is a matter of taste whether a fish-eye a certain effect like it or not. This shows an intent already strong curvature of the lines s.Rand, but synonymous delivers a huge angle.
In general, I recommend not so considerable and wide intentions further more the original intentions of the manufacturer (up to max. 0.5). These are for the corresponding Zoomobjekte precisely tuned and you rarely hear about them Kritk.
Televosätze but you can ever give my opinion.


So is there but the Raynox HD 5050Pro is the right one for me as a 4 and 0.5 wide angle lenses. For the fish-eye effect me so I buy extra nor a Fish-Eye.
Why should I have to forgo the Tele?



Antwort von domain:

Because most consumer zooms in the telephoto range s.sich already bad enough. You need no additional development work of all optical errors that synonymous telephoto without intent strong enough already noticed :-)



Antwort von Moritzk:

"domain" wrote:
Because most consumer zooms in the telephoto range s.sich already bad enough. You need no additional development work of all optical errors that synonymous telephoto without intent strong enough already noticed :-)


Mhmmm, can anyone else confirm this?
The telephoto attachment which I have sought out, was indeed directly responsible for the SonyHDR-SR11 proposed.



Antwort von Moritzk:

"Moritzk" wrote:
Good evening Dear forums members,

I want from my camcorder to the consumer SonyHDR-SR11E to get more for attractive, high-quality recordings in the wide, telephoto, and Fish-Eye to make them.
Currently, I own several already Lenses that I recently bought on Ebay. For this I have total ungefair 100 ¬ spent.
Only the quality of these Lenses are really the full match, usually the edges are blurred, or pale colors.
Now I have the nose full of this Miess quality and now wants me to buy better-quality Lenses.
Here I ask you for a purchase recommendation, and a Council.

I'd like to say how wide-angle, telephoto and various other Lenses / Converter for more from my camera here.
It should of course, the quality of the AVCHD Recording maintained.
What I would like to spend s.Money I can not say at the moment. A real border there is not. I would just simply good quality because I had enough of all the garbage at Ebay.

Many greetings, and thanks in advance,

Moritzk.



What say you to the HD-5000 Pro, or HD-3032 Pro of Raynox? Fits this lens on my cam? And this Lens processed the AVCHD quality SonyCam synonymous my gut?

Regards



Antwort von domain:

Absolutely no glass intent, whether they are filter or converter in front of your original lens, its quality may receive a maximum of the focal etc. with quality change.
With so already, for example, is the question of a maximum "Durchzoombarkeit" nonsense s.sich.
But in my experience are the latest Raynox converter already usable, but only in a very specific situation: when the focal lens of the original is no longer sufficient.
Immediately afterwards, the converter abzuschrauben but again, when this "extreme situation" no longer applies.
Zoom larger in such an intent is not recommended, because the same angle of view is synonymous with small restrictions already without premeditation and with original lens can be reached.



Antwort von Yerri:

So if I already have a good HD camera to buy, I would s.der quality of the essays do not save. I already had a large number of cameras (including Sony's synonymous) and am currently in the original HG Sonywith intentions s.besten mileage. Especially in the HD area, should you have to quality ensured. The series is linked below really very good. While not cheap, but quality has its price:

http://geizhals.at/deutschland/a240164.html

http://geizhals.at/deutschland/a239193.html



Antwort von Yerri:

The above converter predecessors were even better in my opinion, but it is quite difficult and more expensive synonymous:

http://geizhals.at/deutschland/a152169.html

http://geizhals.at/deutschland/a56830.html

PS. See that just "RickyMartini" synonymous Converter has one of these, and the quality.



Antwort von Moritzk:

"Yerri" wrote:
The above converter predecessors were even better in my opinion, but it is quite difficult and more expensive synonymous:

http://geizhals.at/deutschland/a152169.html

http://geizhals.at/deutschland/a56830.html

PS. See that just "RickyMartini" synonymous Converter has one of these, and the quality.


Mhhhm,

yes s.diese Lenses of Sonyhabe I already thought synonymous. Only it was not my question. I wanted to know how your lenses to the stands of Raynox (HD-5000, HD-3032).
Because these Lenses I could very cheap at the time of receiving a friend, so I would like to know how the picture with my camera then.








Antwort von Yerri:

I thought you want after your disappointment with the cheap e-bay intentions to buy something right now!

Then there would have been in my opinion instead of an HD Camera synonymous a 200th - ¬ Model done. If I save s.Converter want, I buy I prefer none at all.



Antwort von Moritzk:

"Yerri" wrote:
I thought you want after your disappointment with the cheap e-bay intentions to buy something right now!

Then there would have been in my opinion instead of an HD Camera synonymous a 200th - ¬ Model done. If I save s.Converter want, I buy I prefer none at all.



And your opinion is a Raynox Lens cheap Ebay crap ... I understand this correctly?
So far I have only actually quite positive opinions of the Raynox HD lenses belongs.



Antwort von Yerri:

Quote:
And your opinion is a Raynox Lens cheap Ebay crap ... I understand this correctly?


I have not claimed. But it is not qualitatively s.die SonyHG ran. I know Raynox, but this can lead to favorable price synonymous not magic. I have it sooner once synonymous with cheap lenses tried. But in the end more expensive * g *



Antwort von Miveo:

"Moritzk" wrote:
I wanted to know how your lenses to the stands of Raynox (HD-5000, HD-3032).


Hello,

I use the HD5050pro (identical with HD5000) s.einer SonySR12 and SonyHC9. Since I SonyWide Anglehabe the synonymous, I can say that the Raynox quality at the same level as that of Sony.

If you have the Raynox converter to get a good price, I would buy them.

Gruss

Miveo



Antwort von Moritzk:

"Miveo" wrote:
"Moritzk" wrote:
I wanted to know how your lenses to the stands of Raynox (HD-5000, HD-3032).


Hello,

I use the HD5050pro (identical with HD5000) s.einer SonySR12 and SonyHC9. Since I SonyWide Anglehabe the synonymous, I can say that the Raynox quality at the same level as that of Sony.

If you have the Raynox converter to get a good price, I would buy them.

Gruss

Miveo


Really not just the whole, a Raynox says buy and the other says buying prefer Sony ...
I would prefer if you could play both times :-) or if someone test pictures with the Raynox 5050 could make.




Antworten zu ähnlichen Fragen:
RED Scarlet-W ProRes Quality
MSU Video Quality Measurement Tool
The Look of ARRI Signature Prime Lenses
Mitakon Speedmaster T1.0 Cinema Lenses
The 7 most extreme and bizarre lenses I've ever tested
MEIKE vs VEYDRA - Battle of the 35mm Cine Lenses
Canon Announces Company’s First 8K Capable Broadcast Lenses
NITECORE Superior Prime Full Frame Cinema Lenses
Nisi F3 Prime Lenses - Neue Vollformat Cine Festbrennweiten angekündigt
analog dv converter
Divx Converter Problem
Canopus DV File Converter
Dvix Converter Ton asychron
Ein WMV Converter in Freeware
SDI/HDMI Micro Converter, Kaufempfehlung?
AJA: Neue 12G-SDI Mini-Converter
Player/Converter für unbekanntes Format gesucht (CDXAfmt)
AVS Video Converter: taugt das Programm etwas??
Hands On: Sigma EF-L-Mount Converter MC-21 an der Panasonic S1 // NAB 2019
Blackmagic: Neue Micro Converter 12G Modelle mit 3D-LUTs und 4K-Unterstützung
Blackmagic Design: neue Micro Converter 3G Modelle mit HDMI und 3G SDI
Cooke Lenses - Cooke Optics Fabrik Rundgang
11 (!) SIGMA ART AF Festbrennweiten für L-Mount noch in diesem Jahr u. L-Mount Converter MC-21
Very High Frame Rate
FCPX mit High Sierra ??!!
Ultra High Speed Cameras

















weitere Themen:
Spezialthemen


16:9
AI
ARD
AVCHD
AVI
Adobe After Effects
Adobe Premiere Pro
After effects
Apple Final Cut Pro
Audio
Avid
Avid Media Composer
Cam
Camcorder
Camera
Canon
Capture
Capturing
Clip
EOS
Editing
Effect
Error
Export
File
Files
Film
Final Cut
Format
Formate
HDR
Import
JVC
KI
Layer
Light
MAGIX video deLuxe
Magix
Microphone
Monitor
Movie
PC
Panasonic
Pinnacle
Pinnacle Studio
Player
Premiere
RAM
RED
Recording
Red
Software
Sony
Sound
Studio
TV
Tape
Video
Videos