Infoseite // Lenses and "The old, tiresome theme"



Frage von Al-Mo:


Hi folks,
someone has experience with the tele-conversion lenses of and for the Panasonic (30, 37 and 43mm)?
Is the quality ok or am I acidification by the Picture (eg a more serious image degradation) with respect to brightness? And how does through the screwed-on, additional focal "the old, tiresome topic" with the depth of a positive impact - or would be with so'ne Lens Dirk Diggler's best piece on the whole length still stay sharp? :-)
Greetings!

Space


Antwort von Stefan:

Now you have a question to a tele lens (Tele Converter) or) to a close-up lens (macro lens?

Good luck
The fat Stefan

Space


Antwort von Al-Mo:

No, a telephoto lens (so synonymous my question because of the depth due to the focal length magnification)

Why "Good luck"? :-)

The lanky Al-Mo

Space


Antwort von Stefan:

The depth of focus with increasing focal area is smaller, but so small as you might hope to, it is not in my view. However, the increases are synonymous close range, that is, next you need to stay away from the subject, so you can at all in sharp focus.

Furthermore, reduced by the additional lenses (reflection, absorption, angle of view) the intensity ( "1-2 f-stops" s. typ zoom lenses), therefore you need better lighting. In practice, I would simply simulate times less intensity. On some camcorders, so you can adjust the aperture or manual switch on one ND filter.

(Good luck *)
The fat Stefan

(*) Not hurt, right?

Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash