I'm looking for a not too big and not too heavy tripod, if possible, without blubbery ball. Oh, and too expensive, it should not be synonymous.
Now there is this 15 ¬ Hama scrap yes apparently not the first choice. I have noticed in the search, so-called light / light stands. These were originally intended for mounting of lights, but have synonymous 1 / 4 "thread. So you could theoretically use it synonymous for camcorder, is it?
Antwort von tommyb:
Sure. But these tripods have no head, that is, the camera then looks straight ahead on the horizon EXACTLY synonymous.
Since the Billigteile for 15 EURO are still better - which can be to adjust the camera pan and tilt, at least.
Antwort von Büschel:
"TommyB" wrote:
Sure. But these tripods have no head, that is, the camera then looks straight ahead on the horizon EXACTLY synonymous.
Well that's what I want, yes. Since I usually at levels planned films, is a ball as mostly just a nuisance. I put the camera on the tripod to grab - movies - together again, go next, put the camera back on, etc.
There is such an egghead really only impractical, because the camera is then almost always prone. Even with something better ball heads that is so ...
So would such a tripod suitable for my project?
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Who uses nen please shoot the ball?
............
Yes can be a light tripod take.
But is recommended only conditionally.
What do you want to spend?
MfG B. DeKid
Antwort von tommyb:
Quote:
There is such an egghead really only impractical, because the camera is then almost always prone. Even with something better ball heads that is so ...
In fact ... Ball heads are more than Stillimage-and not intended for video cameras.
Otherwise there is) synonymous still such things as water truck (dragonfly - that are synonymous to 15 Euro plastic stands.
Antwort von Büschel:
Well, the fact is indeed now time that these cheap Neiger itself almost entirely disguise from looking, right? Neiger, ball head ... I really mean in general any Neigemechanismen.
Maximum price limit is around 30 ¬.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
"Fan" wrote:
... Since such an egghead is really just not practical, since the camera is then almost always prone. Even with something better ball heads that is so ...
The heads of Billigstativen argc have difficulty in pan, but a pure holding the camera in one position forever, they any good - ten pounds will not weigh your camera probably yes. Lighting Stands of the targeted price range of your other hand, are already scheduled for its far down leg construction is not recommended for the camera assembly: This is too shaky affair. Some of Billigstativ Bilora, Cullmann, Hama, Velbon or someone else is chosen as the better choice.
