Newsmeldung von slashCAM:\u003cspan style=\
Antwort von r.p.television:
41 megapixels with such a small lens on such a tiny sensor? \u003cbr /\u003e That is sometimes the biggest bullshit. Unfortunately, because many fall back on it purely to have heard of what has never Beugungsunschaerfen etc..
Antwort von jaquecube:
It depends a.wie these pixels are processed when actually used in parallel to accommodate individual Farbkanaele and then eventually it becomes a 10Mpx image is there anything wrong with. The fact that the phone is probably 41 Megapixel sensor is of course important for the show-off already :) And that is synonymous with the zoom is not bad.
Antwort von Bodis.tv:
wants to say anything, but the chip is fucking great! \u003cbr /\u003e 1/1, 2 inches \u003cbr /\u003e How great then are the data of an image? None can even send more
Antwort von 407621:
\u003cspan style=\
Antwort von Tiefflieger:
Means in HD lossless four professional digital zoom at the sensor pixel count. \u003cbr /\u003e Internal processing in 2160 or 1080 crop (for the Electronic Image Stabilization which should be advantageous synonymous). \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Therefore could result in a fairly well-positioned unresolved image where the lens is good. (Rush and another can be estimated so not). \u003cbr /\u003e The fact is that today, 5 and 8 megapixel sensors are installed for breastfeeding and what will be disbanded as synonymous always real. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e If this is so, then get a new mobile TV stations report variant (iPhone already proven to be used /). \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e For me, it looks as if the video camera market is of the back wound. \u003cbr /\u003e That is, for me personally there is only one camera in the camcorder area (including prof. Interlaced) is very close to a
Antwort von Schwermetall:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von r.p.television:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von Schwermetall:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von cantsin:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von aerobel:
Wow, great device ... \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e There are so few pixels fetishists back bent low by the world in motion, so that the bulge in the pants do not look too much ... \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Rudolf
Antwort von Tiefflieger:
The more devices with good image quality on the market, the more quality is required. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Proverbs such as Sun \u003cbr /\u003e "The most important part is behind the camera" \u003cbr /\u003e or \u003cbr /\u003e "The content is more important" \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Applies only to a limited extent, because it is not about fetishism pixels but "dull" following (working) tools in the professional sector (majority of the amateur / customer). \u003cbr /\u003e Later than end 2015's flagpole. \u003cbr /\u003e (What does the C300 and F3 test out one sees in the other thread) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Greetings low-flying aircraft
Antwort von musicmze:
I add just before, as I come to a corporate customer with a mobile phone :-) naja .. wers needs.
Antwort von blackradish:
The photos are definitely a true low-light treat: D
