Infoseite // Micro-comparison t.bone 9600, Videomic, MKE 300



Frage von Fryd:


I describe here my experiences, I observed in the Choice of my microphone had made. To classify my reviews, it is important to know that I am ambitious amateur value on a good picture and sound an acceptable place. I am Beginners and had a total of about 2 h video recordings made. Because I want to have it easy, should Microphone primarily sit on the camcorder. When I use a camcorder Panasonic NV GS 280th

t.bone em9600
Total length about 40 cm (including times). Looks to 14 cm long from camcorder complete overkill. Strong drive noise through the bracket. Pipe and bracket are two separate parts. Sounds not bad otherwise. Noise can probably drive through a corresponding bracket reduced. - The additional purchased cable (XLR to mini-jack, length 1.5 m) for direct connection actually too long and for everything else too short. The mini-jack was dirty work, so that the times when Rausziehen from the socket continuously verhakte. - No further testing performed.

1. Specials on Equipment / Design

Sennheiser MKE 300
weighs 64 g with battery, fits well with the optical camcorder. Battery monitoring by an LED flash briefly when you turn. Angled plug. At the bottom of the accessory shoe adapter, there is a brass thread, with the Micro synonymous somewhere can be tightened.

The Windscreen (foam) is firmly connected with the Micro: This is a little Velcro strap around the pipe is stuck. The foam attaches itself s.das Velcro.

If the accessory shoe very far forward s.Camcorders sits, it may be that the micro-tip protrudes into the picture. The GS280 is not the case. As for the lens behaves (wide), I can not say.

Rode Videomic

Delivery in 1 rubber mount torn (4 replacement rubber is attached). Weighs with Battery (9V block) 220 g. Battery control by constantly glowing LED, angled plug. In the battery compartment there is a slider, which is at 0, 10, 20 dB leaves. The default setting is 0 dB. That part is not described in the instructions.

The accessory shoe is located at the GS280 rear, directly over the viewfinders. As the pattern goes Videomic backwards as far out on the viewfinders that are synonymous extracted can not use. The adapter can further s.einer position s.das frame bolt. This extends the Micro but still next to the rear out. Probably, it is possible the other way around microfinance in the frame must be installed. Then it would use the viewfinders, but the accessory shoe of your camcorder, then the leverage effect and because of the high weight of the microphone heavily burdened.

2. Recording

MKE 300: Recording only on left channel (mono jack).

s.erstes Microfinance: Does noise on the mount. At the GS-280, this is a clear sound of about 150 Hz it is clearly perceptible, not only at rest. The sound could be very good software to filter out. After phone call with Sennheiser Comparison I have a second to MKE 300 ordered. - Sennheiser is the autumn of 2007, the MKE 400 with better suspension on the market. The sound is overall better than the MKE 300 and the price level with the 300th MKE

b) second Microfilm: The Disturbing 150-Hz sound is barely perceptible, comparable with the Rode Videomic. Otherwise no differences for the first MKE 300 found. First Micro returned as defective.

Videomic: The sound recording is done on both channels. No immediately identifiable noise. The 150-Hz sound is present but barely audible. The decoupling of the rubber suspension is very good. The other (not through the cradle) recorded noise appear to me (especially at rest) than when MKE300, although the Microphone next removed from the camcorder. Clear bass, perhaps

Space


Antwort von Ela-Luca:

Man, super that you've tested everything.
Do you have the favor of Thomann made available to get?

Thank you, thank you, thank you - I will now take for my MKE300 NV GS500.

Many greetings!

Space


Antwort von Fryd:

Not directly. Thomann granted (as other vendor synonymous) the possibility of a free return. I just ordered the phone and immediately said that I am only one of the three microphones will retain. That was no problem. - All were ordered Micro immediately paid by credit card. But I had back in my account rather than that the CC was debited ...

Have now synonymous with a relatively large amount of wind with the MKE 300 filmed and had no noise. I'm still excited. - It is synonymous way, a type of MKE 300 indicate that the mono signal to both channels transmit.

From MKE There are now 400 photos and some data. But that seems not yet to be available.

Space


Antwort von Ela-Luca:

Until now, I'm very satisfied synonymous, but have not yet tested very much.

I had synonymous find that the Microphone glückerlicherweise not so very bad is extremely sensitive as all say.
So loud applause when it will be critical, but otherwise it seems to me exactly right.

Space


Antwort von Johannes:

"Ela-Luca" wrote: Until now, I'm very satisfied synonymous, but have not yet tested very much.

I had synonymous find that the Microphone glückerlicherweise not so very bad is extremely sensitive as all say.
So loud applause when it will be critical, but otherwise it seems to me exactly right.

And at the moment is the T.bone em9600 s.der series.
So I was at many concerts with the mic right next to the boxes
the internal mic has begun to "flat" with the T.bone everything went
quite normal.

Space


Antwort von Der_Jo:

"Fryd" wrote: It is synonymous way, a type of MKE 300 indicate that the mono signal to both channels transmit.

There are, incidentally for 2-3 euros a good electrical shop called "mono adapter. This is the problem that in mono microphone sound only on one channel is located. Is small, just as big as a Male. Works of course synonymous with all other mono microphone with 3.5 mm jack.

Space


Antwort von Fryd:

Since March 2008 is synonymous the Sennheiser MKE 400 for approximately 180 EUR are available. It is of the dimensions significantly smaller than the 300th MKE However, I have not tried it.

Info for Sennheiser: http://www.sennheiser.com/sennheiser/icm.nsf/root/502047

Ein Testbericht ist in VideoAktiv 3/2008 erschienen. Siehe dazu synonymous: http://www.videoaktiv.de/content/view/1496/2/

Regards
Fryd.

Space


Antwort von WoWu:

Thank you for the test.
Short Demand: How did you start with the sensitivity (adaptation to the camcorder) have come to cope.
The MKE has a control (+/-) ... stand where and how was the audio control then?

Good greetings, Wolfgang

Google it out: ISBN 978-3-00-023484-2

Space


Antwort von Fryd:

Hello Wolfgang,

The MKE 300 has such a controller does not. Den there is only the MKE 400, and I have not tested.

As little as I film, I am with the MKE 300 well served. As for the sound sometimes influenced is that the Level I manual s.Camcorders not disqualify or limit may be. This then causes the camcorder in the absence of foreground noise fully aufdreht and the background noise (eg road) is very loud. But since the Micro can not help it.

Problems with a Übersteuerng I had not yet.

Space



Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash