Infoseite // Minimum system requirements for AVCHD editing



Frage von amlug:


A good evening everybody!

I consider myself a AVCHD camcorder zuzulegen.

To do this, I wanted to know what this hardware because at least in the PC should connect to halfway decent cut them?
By this I mean that the cut in the timeline when playing more than half the film to be seen and not to the slideshow with sound mutates. Render speeds are erstmal me no preference.

mfg amlug

PS I know that there are already threads on PCs for AVCHD editing, but where was my rather for a certain sum of the hardware together, rather than minimum requirements.

Space


Antwort von RickyMartini:

http://www.videotreffpunkt.com/thread.php?threadid=7112

Space


Antwort von amlug:

Wunderbar! Very good article, to me it is now synonymous much about AVCHD become clear what I previously did not know.

You should already have a 2.66 as Quad have native AVCHD editing. For RAM there was nothing, so that looks like? graphics card is expected to be rather trivial, does not it?
But how is that the Intermediate-cut? There was nothing specific hardware requirements, can I still call someone approximate value?

Otherwise, just many, many thanks. Did very helpful to me.

mfg amlug

Space


Antwort von unodostres:

Na graphics card is not so trivial. The system must have to match otherwise it pulls the power down. Man gets no yes synonymous Porsche 135er and then narrow tires on it :-)

Space


Antwort von unodostres:

Ram, you can never have enough. But then have to have Vista 64bit. Thus you can manage synonymous.
Minimum 4 GB. Preferably more.

Space


Antwort von amlug:

Ah, ok. Thank you. What should be because at least for a graphics card be?

Space


Antwort von RickyMartini:

A gamer or CAD map is surely needed. As a recent enough midrange model is sufficient. One for about ¬ 100 (nVidia 9600, AMD / Ati 4650/4850) is ok and provide reserves for GPU-accelerated effects.

Space


Antwort von Daigoro:

"amlug" wrote:
PS I know that there are already threads on PCs for AVCHD editing, but where was my rather for a certain sum of the hardware together, rather than minimum requirements.


There's synonymous far too many variables to something really meaningful to say.

What editing software? (I still do not know 'Consumer', which more than one core in the preview exploits - there is therefore a faster dual core over a slower quad core - when rendering may again be different - maybe there's with the new Magix improvement? Or Premiere Elements reserves as of the theoretical CS4 existing functionality? Can not say)
And how much will actually be about? For simple, hard cuts followed with "smart" may render the naturally slower processor than in color and Effekstrotzerei.

Without knowing it can be considered as a maximum absolute minimum "the best thing you can afford" call.

Space


Antwort von RickyMartini:

The "Sony Vegas" and the "Canopus Edius" Konsumerversionen use existing cores quite clearly. Always 100% is not always desirable, since no other concurrent tasks can be performed. Individual nuclei can, however, synonymous with an application for any assign.

I think a quad on desktop systems as a requirement, since the time benefits are obvious lie. I speak from experience!

Space



Space


Antwort von Daigoro:

"RickyMartini" wrote: The "Sony Vegas" and the "Canopus Edius" Konsumerversionen use existing cores quite clearly. Always 100% is not always desirable, since no other concurrent tasks can be performed. Individual nuclei can, however, synonymous with an application for any assign.

During the preview, or render?
I remember vermeine me to Vegas, at least in the test version that I had in the preview has a maximum of one core utilized (CPU utilization around 50% - a key to the 100 and the other 2-3).

Perhaps there's (or hopefully soon) a new version of synonymous, the easier it - I'm not necessarily up to date and no longer have the time to download each new version and to test. : (

"RickyMartini" wrote:
I think a quad on desktop systems as a requirement, since the time benefits are obvious lie. I speak from experience!


If the Programs which fully benefit from it.
Whether a film in 5 hours or in 10 fertigrendert, at least, is less important to me as if he were in the preview jerky / proxy vorrendert about.

The tendency is always to the second computer.
Why should I use resources from the main machine for 'Nebenheraufgaben' away, when I conveniently s.Zweitrechner everything it can (ok, the power companies would like to thank me: D)

Space


Antwort von RickyMartini:

Quad as a "cold-blooded" for the hard work and the dual-core notebook for parallel "warm-blooded" tasks. :)

Space


Antwort von amlug:

Hmm, again thank s.alle. Werds gegbenen time to time it can get, how much money is available, at least now I know what matters.

I cut at the moment with Magix VdL 2008, the latest version of which is so synonymous native AVCHD editing support. Cutting usually with mainly hard cuts, to color, but few other effects.

An extra notebook for minutiae sounds good. Is my money not only disagree with, I fear ;-)

Space


Antwort von wolfgang:

Only color belong to the compute-intensive things, hard cuts on the other hand, hardly. Ram will be in modern 64-bit systems tend 8 GB up construction - there is anyway only Vegas 8.1 which is the full 64 bit support, and less than 8 GB you there hardly an advantage.

Whether or not the graphics card is relevant depends on the cutting system - in Vegas would have no such preference, otherwise NLEs use but (approximately Adobe). Because it is synonymous drauf but careful what you should construction - this is then dependent on the NLE.

Space


Antwort von wetterfrosch:

Hello!

I did just in time before the birth of my throne Folgers a Canon HF10 gegönnt ...
Did I really ineressanten the link to video Treffpunkt've read and have some questions about the AVCHD postprocessing ...
1. Is there a link somewhere where Basics / Basic concepts to be explained DV editing? Beginners'm bloody and often stumble over the ABC
2. Currently have the following system, which is certainly not sufficient for DV editing? AMD Athlon X2 4850e, 4GB RAM (800MHz), Nvidia 8600GT (but will soon be upgraded) 2 HDDs 0.75 and 1 TB, Windows XP
or what can you do with intermediate? Sony Vegas or Corel should indeed synonymous with not quite as fast as CPUs can start (a long time included) ... just let the system do not upgrade (up to GraKa) because it serves me as a HTPC and relatively synonymous power efficient to remain ...
Would otherwise prefer to wait and the first files on the hard drive to archive and edit them later me ... then if the prices are something like an adequate system of second-growth
Thank you for your tips .. Oh and yes I have nat. Search the forums and have used synonymous already read other posts ...
Gruß Thomas

Space


Antwort von schlaflos011:

Hello,

http://www.slashcam.de/artikel/Book Reviews / The-Videoschnittschule.html
http://www.slashcam.de/katalog/Filmpraxis-Shooting-Shooting.html

With AVCHD post, I have no experience but with this tool so it should now work beautifully.
http://www.slashcam.de/news/single/CineForm-Neo-Scene--leichter-with- AVCHD and HDV-arb-7410.html

Space


Antwort von immanuelkant:

a note: Pinnacle Studio Plus 11/12 / ultimate apply to be very efficient and performat in the AVCHD processing.
I'm very pleased with himself PS 12 ultimate!

Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash