A friend of me wants to be a new camcorder for home growth. I advise him, but I am working as a DV camcorder user no longer on the latest knowledge. I now propose that now MPEG format the single image formats such as DV, DigiBeta, etc. more and more the rank expire. Hätt Now I have a few questions:
1: Keep format, which is based on MPEG2 and MPEG4 (h.264) based after cutting without loss of quality just like DV.
2: How does MPEG-cut technically? Will the GOP since evolved into frames?
3: Can MPEG-material synonymous with After Effects, Combustion or any other compositing and editing programs makes farbkorrigieren, stability problems, etc.?
4: What are the pros and cons of DVCProHD and XDCAM opposite of AVCHD to DV what the picture quality is concerned?
5: If you are web videos like wmv, Quicktime Sorenson 3, Real, Flash, DivX, Xvid, etc makes that as AVCHD is based on MPEG4, then you should not decide for AVCHD? Personally, I believe that the source material should always be of higher value than the final product and the AVCHD data rate is already abysmally low.
What do you think? I appreciate every opinion.
Antwort von WoWu:
You ask ... because really big issues that are not in a few words are to be answered. Therefore I really Recommendation: http://www.lulu.com/content/1361380
All of the completely Objektivgüte, about the different sensors, data reduction, to the NLE. And above all things, the necessary connections, since each subject, separated from the general context, it is only conditionally meaningful.
Antwort von Ipiranga:
Thanks for the book. Of the content seems to really like me to be tailored, as the second book by the same author.
Antwort von hazuki:
Oh, oh ...........
If the paragraph is not how we want?
Antwort von WoWu:
I can not complain, but for some it is just much easier to show .... synonymous here as I have learned in the Forum. For those who always appear only anonymous can, however, it did not represent simple enough. For the issue is always just a mystery with "seven seals" remain.
Antwort von hannes:
> If the paragraph is not as intentional?
he can not synonymous, because far too many "specialists" rumlaufen who talk of things, of which they really have no idea. And these people think, without qualified information synonymous living. Of those living then the MM's and how they all mean.
From Dieter Nuhr: "If I have no idea, just keep the face".
I have written this book, I've read, I do not score at all in conformity with the author, is sometimes synonymous to me in theory, but one is with safety: WORTH READING! and without the if and but!