Why because "moderate"? This criticism is without superlatives stupid, full of praise. This type of distribution, some form of online pay-per-view, is the future of the "film" is not all clear? A link in the article to comment on Soderbergh's "Avatar" shows the desperate effort of the "cinema". Once again 200 million for a techno-porn.
Antwort von Valentino:
"Axel" wrote:
This type of distribution, some form of online pay-per-view, is the future of the "film" is not all clear?
Online pay-per-view but is not the movies can replace the synonymous should be clear to everyone. Because everyone is synonymous not FullHD projector, a 7.1 surround system, a 25MBit line (; VOD in HD requires so much) and a popcorn machine, the next s.sich movies exist. Quite aside from that most do not go to the movies to get a movie but to have social interactions with pfelgen ;-) Somehow this is video on demand is not synonymous with the masses arrived.
Antwort von beiti:
"Valentino" wrote:
Online pay-per-view but is not the movies can replace the synonymous should be clear to everyone. Because everyone is synonymous not FullHD projector, a 7.1 surround system, a 25MBit line (VOD in HD requires so much) and a popcorn machine, the next s.sich movies exist. Quite aside from that most do not go to the movies to get a movie but to have social interactions with pfelgen ;-)
Then the movies something like a Laundromat for Movies: Who does not have its own home theater has to be in a public movies go. ;)
Antwort von Axel:
The example of the cinema industry, you can see where the market controls. Since everything depends on many years of life s.den conservation machinery of the entertainment industry as a marketing-driven with grace bread supplies. At the moment in which we succeed in creating a new forum with a certain prestige to build, put the switch to, and it creates new Starbucks or carpet warehouse. This is not a cinema operator s.die large bell, you will finally do not have to pronouncements of death. " Everyone is talking about the fact that they love movies, but fewer and fewer people go out. For years, the non-utilization, to cover costs. Without a tax write-off models and without the significance of the above predicate "was in the Movies" for further assessment would be a long shift in the shaft.
Antwort von beiti:
"Axel" wrote:
Everyone is talking about the fact that they love movies, but fewer and fewer people go out.
I have the impression that the word "movie" often literally no longer the room with seats and canvas describes, but increasingly a synonym for "movie" will. Tele 5 ( "We love movies.") Is the best example: While there are synonymous reviews of current movies, but the core activity is the broadcasting of films.
Antwort von Kino:
OT: With the theatrical release alone, the cost (or perhaps better: return expectations) a production only rarely achieve, but fall apart from the creation of the work alone, up to 50% overhead for marketing, copies, ... at.
"Axel" wrote:
... At the moment in which we succeed in creating a new forum with a certain prestige to build, put the switch to, and it creates new Starbucks or carpet warehouse. ...
It is undisputed that the proceeds of the secondary höhermargigen Evaluation (VoD, home entertainment, pay, free TV) is proportional to the previous visit to the cinema behave. Thus more and more productions find their way onto the canvas, the object degenerates Marketing (keyword: Rising Number s.Titeln graduated in the course of the number of visitors per annum). This trend will continue in the near future even more strengthened when the cost hurdle of expensive screening by DCP-synonymous hard for smaller productions will be overcome. In parallel, the B-Mayors its goods are still widely spread, or by 3D upgrade attempt.
"beiti" wrote:
... Tele 5 ( "We love movies.") Is the best example: While there are synonymous reviews of current movies, but the core activity is the broadcasting of films.
Hit amidships: Owner of Tele 5 is Herbert Kloiber with its TMG (Tele München Group). The Kirch-students "also maintains the Concorde film distribution and nearly half s.Cinemaxx. Calculated that this gentleman with the positive occupy term "Movies" on his transmitter advertises, shows how little interest he has s.originären movie business, but he plays almost on the entire keyboard of the recovery chain.
Return relating to: If Soderbergh with his new film chooses a path, with the traditional analysis breaks down, I can from the two perspectives. Either he gives the (conditions for its low-budget-) not very successful title on the screen and saves costs, or there is a test of how the theatrical release will dispensable is / would be.
Antwort von beiti:
Soderbergh repeatedly makes "deliberately uncommercial" films among its successes. Apparently he needs to act out artistically. Whether you are successful, it should not matter much. And a mini-budget of 1.7 million U.S. dollars wirtschaftet it all again.
A useful test of whether the marketing chain can turn around, would only be with a mainstream production. The Movies-evaluation is likely in the case, a more formal nature (eg to prepare for possible Oscar nominations to qualify).
Antwort von Valentino:
"beiti" wrote:
Then the movies something like a Laundromat for Movies: Who does not have its own home theater has to be in a public movies go. ;)
The comparison limps but very, synonymous if I assume that you are so synonymous not take it quite seriously.
For Movies as in theater had to / must leave his house, his clothes can be (n, or Mama) for over hundreds of years to wash at home ;-) The laundry as we see it from land or Ami so familiar with are still no hundred years.
As already said, the movies s.sich will be some time next Dadu and there are a lot of reasons. Grand Theater as even small theaters until now were not yet synonymous with modern musical halls or DVD ousted.
Antwort von strike300xxx:
What a lame movie. Hardly worth watching.
However, I knew not synonymous with the Red anamorphotic can. Re-learned:)
Antwort von Mankell:
Where have you seen the movie? At Amazon gehts so only in the U.S..
Antwort von HDjunky:
"strike300xxx" wrote:
However, I knew not synonymous with the Red anamorphotic can. Re-learned:)
The RED can work with 2x anamorphotic, but this is no perfect solution.
Therefore, the German company VANTAGE FILM with your new Hawk V-Series anamorphotic (factor 1.33) just for cameras like the RED 16:9 and other sensors, a TOP product rausgebracht.
Soederbergh continued anamorphotic synonymous in his film "Che" one if it were HAWK ..... I can not say.
A complete set-Hawk Anamorphic Lenses probably cost about 500 000 euro Price :-) about 40 000-55 000 euros. Of course you can borrow synonymous!
