Frage von weitwinkel:
there is already experience with the aforementioned \u003cbr /\u003e NEX models may use the film as a B-cam? \u003cbr /\u003e greeting cj
Antwort von weitwinkel:
ok the audio part is probably nothing not there.
Antwort von Frank B.:
So I got the NEX 5 with latest firmware (5.0), but suppose that the above models because of you not significantly differ in terms of filming. The newer models feature now 50p instead of 50i (25p) on. \u003cbr /\u003e The NEX 5 makes mostly good pictures. But you can only intervene very little design in the image. There are a few fixed einprogammierte presets and a possibility to adjust the exposure. Also, I find the menu very awkward to Hangelei through (I'm only a few days). \u003cbr /\u003e However, I have seen since in a few shots with the NEX 5 synonymous already negative surprises. Thus, a couch was pulled over on a person sitting with terrible color streaks. The ribbed pattern on the sofa fabric has produced a moire, which was unfortunately only visible on a Vorfuehrmonitor. On the camera screen as you have seen nothing. As the main (video) camera, I would not recommend the devices. I use them together with a FS-100. Can be replaced with the possibility of the Lenses, for me it makes it an ideal supplement my video equipment.
 |
Antwort von weitwinkel:
Thank you for your assessment. \u003cbr /\u003e I've read so far is the 5N \u003cbr /\u003e However, a better composition in the video sector \u003cbr /\u003e than the 5th
Antwort von Frank B.:
What do you mean better? \u003cbr /\u003e I've heard, the moire problem was not solved. Perhaps it is a bit sharper, but what good is that if they produced artifacts in certain situations?
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
Clearly, these cameras are synonymous to the film is suitable, you have to stop it can only!
