Since many videographers so completely unteachable, obviously, unfortunately, still record in 25 fps, they will not buy this part, although a reference image to the audio recording would have been well determined.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
What it bad record in 25fps - but please explain the time ;-))
MfG B. DeKid
Antwort von Frank B.:
My contribution was to be a satire. I work synonymous in 25 fps. Unfortunately, camera manufacturers to disqualify themselves if they only offer the possibility of recording at 30 fps. That keeps me on the purchase of such a device. Not only that, annoys me the ignorant behavior of the Manufacturer, which cover the European market with NTSC derivatives.
Antwort von tmh1608:
Actually, for me there is no particular reason to take in 25 fps. I know at least no television, DVD player, multimedia player or PC that has a problem with 30 fps.
On the contrary, you have even a higher motion resolution. At most, the duration / pitch changes "in an emergency" when converting to PAL. And it gets light ghosting. And one is away from the next 6 fps film look ;-)
I cut my NTSC material under EDIUS always NTSC conditions. Works out quite well. File Export synonymous NTSC. Looks s.PC good. And I think for the cameras are built mainly synonymous.
Antwort von Frank B.:
If you only turn in 30 fps and edited, this may go so synonymous (may be lights flickering a little;)), but woe betide you want to mix it with existing PAL material. 25 frames are some standards for ourselves and I hope this will be a while longer remain so.
Antwort von domain:
The reason why people in our region should be at 25 or 50 are fps so is our power frequency of 50 Hz, meaning that flicker a lot of artificial light sources or a multiple thereof and the results may nasty interference, so a picture is flickering, how it might look like on video, recorded in USA. All experienced it himself.
