Frage von k2bello:
Hello!
Now I've been here for some time rummaging in the forum and get a lot of important information bezgl synonymous purchasing my camcorder, so me with my budget to purchase one of the two aforementioned camcorder seems reasonable.
Unfortunately, there are apparent weaknesses in both camcorders, which I would probably feel a nuisance.
Since I am novice camcorder, it would help me a lot if someone could tell me of the more experienced users, which of these weaknesses might not be so weighty.
So:
Panasonic:
- Has seemed to dim light argc problems with the noise, but I will soon be filming in the coming holiday synonymous evening at dusk, that's me in the dark is not at rest in the clear :-) Is the difference bezgl of noise in relation to Sonyeigentlich really that great, or just for "experts" visible?
- Not enough synonymous from the 180 GS, or the difference of the Lenses and the lack of optical Stabilisationsystem big?
Sony:
- Touch screen: gag, which I hate intended
- Only 1 CCD .... hmm very sharp contrast to Pana?
- External appearance would nagut, now not as crucial
Are there any other significant differences between the two cams, or even an alternative model would be around 600 ¬ in the segment in question?
Or is even the 180 GS?
As I say film, I will mal hier mal da ..... nothing definite. Stop just for fun.
Would be very grateful if I could help someone. Thanks in advance.
Antwort von Markus:
Hello,
Only time s.Rande: True good camcorder is not in the hundreds price range to be found, but only in the digit. With a purchase price of 600 ¬ you will therefore always some trade-offs must respond, whether it be a weakness in poor lighting, or perhaps that the camcorder has a touch screen (I would, however, synonymous nerves - a display is not angetatscht!).
The difference between 1CCD and 3CCD not reflected in the sharpness. This is for all SD camcorders, more or less the same (well, the very cheap camcorder with facet-eye Picture impression time outside) before leaving.
The differences are especially seen in the color differentiation, with a good 1-Chipper not necessarily must be lower than a "very expensive" 3-Chipper. For devices of the same class but I would expect a difference.
If the image intensifier, the same size and subsequent signal processing otherwise identical, then one should expect synonymous with an increased light sensitivity and 3CCD. The latter can be due to the different manufacturers (Sony, which do not Panasonic), however.
Related topic:
Antwort von k2bello:
Hello Mark!
First, thank you for your explanation. I just got now opted for the GS 280, because touch screen .... nee somehow goes garnicht, absolute knock-out criterion after long deliberation.
As the power of lowlight pana indeed should not be so tingly again a question:
Is it worth buying a video of the two lamps in the Panasonic range? I like to have a little synonymous film wenns dawn. Or any good to nix?
Thanks in advance!
Antwort von moojoo:
Hello k2bello,
I have asked myself synonymous whether the GS-180 is sufficient in low light. Now that I have some test reports of users will find (to read usbei guenstiger.de) and some were durchauszufrieden with the shooting in low light, I have ordered them. If you want to make you the 280s, then I would take. An optical image stabilizer is definitely a big plus and a Leica lens at least an "almost-big" ...
Regards
moojoo
Antwort von Markus:
The video lights of Panasonic, I can not say anything, but general info (and find more links) on this subject your contribution in the following:
->
Video Light for Panasonic NV-GS 400
