Frage von Andre Steiger:
Hello,
was on the verge of my trip to the south. For my camcorder, I wanted to give me now still a screw-Circular-polarizer, because most likely I will have many sunny days .. :)
Now, I browsed through several stores and am confused: for the desired filter diameter (58mm), there is still a fairly extensive Choice. Synonymous, the price starts at 30 ¬ s.and go up there's synonymous in the 3-digit area. Since the theme of the filter on your camcorder is new territory for me, I would be for practical tips and product recommendations very grateful!
In the forum, I read more often synonymous, the Recommendation for the Cokin system, in principle, not uninteresting, but I would like to start with one erstmal Spin.
Merci!
Andre.
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
The Cokin system is therefore of practical that it is beneficial for all and we do not need to buy new cameras Lenses and Spin.
The optical quality is quite good, only the Cokin filter to get faster scrapes as of Tiffen filter.
Antwort von Andre Steiger:
No question, the Cokin filter are designed well. What bothers me because the moment is that I can not use when using the filter my sun visor. So would be my Top Spin for the better.
Gruss,
Andre.
Antwort von Anna8543:
So you do not use all the polarizer? Are there specific reasons?
Antwort von Markus:
So you do not use all the polarizer? Who said that? ;-)
Incidentally, I have Cokin synonymous in use, because several camcorder with different filter thread-Ø are available. Then I do not have to handle with adapter rings and the replacement of the filter synonymous faster.
In Spin, I would look around in the area around ¬ 50. Hama is quite good, this brand has synonymous if not exactly a professional reputation. Personally, I would be a HTMC-tempered ghostless s.liebsten-circular-polarizing filter, but I'm not sure if it Ghostlessfilter even yet exist.
The simultaneous use of a camcorder's lens hood you have time check whether the work at all. A polarizing filter must be rotated so, that is because you have good drankommen. The filter is sitting somewhere in the hood, this option is beyond the pale.
Antwort von Andre Steiger:
Hello.
The Cokin system is on my list then extension (for the next holiday:)
Had this filter here was in the direction:
http://www2.computeruniverse.net/info.asp?id=90129702&language=deutsch&pm=b+DE
With this filter, worsens the problem with the sun visor because of this journal. I have tested it with the S-aperture time, nor enough with the finger reinzufassen and zurechtzudrehen a filter, and stop only when the pin is gone ... :-O
Gruss Andre.
Antwort von Markus:
I have tested it with the S-aperture time, nor enough with the finger reinzufassen and zurechtzudrehen a filter, and stop only when the pin is gone ... Exactly the problem I thought. While you rightly turn your filter, you watch logically to the video image to hit the right spot. That is not logically possible if your hand concealed during Rotate the Picture and you can move the filter, but hardly rational. - How about an alternative with a round lens hood, which is screwed onto the polarizer?
The linked filter I find absolutely okay.
Antwort von Anna8543:
Hi Markus,
You're right! To me it was not quite aware :-|
But the idea with the screw-on lens hood seems a good compromise!
For this one last question, I have this ausgeschaut a rubber lens hood, which can be folded out in 2-stages:
Hama hood
Antwort von grovel:
Well, actually but a polarizing filter alone would eat up even any stray light. Or maybe not?
Was in any event (except) for photos in the sun has never been any side-light effect on my photos had. I always thought that the sun visor is unnecessary with polarizing filters. (But I do hold photos only synonymous with polarizing filters)
SeeYa Groveler
Antwort von Markus:
When the sun visors are not only different thread diameter, but synonymous different angle. As you may have to try that the sun visors with your camcorder in harmony, that produces no vignetting.
@ Grovel: A proper lens hood makes the camcorder from one or other of her look more professional. By that I mean of course the purely external. ;-)
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
For the Cokin-system (I seem to myself to look like a Cokin representative) there Streulichtblenden to start. For those who are very steep with the highlights have to do, there is a compendium synonymous in the range.
But this is not cheap for Cokin "value".
Antwort von Markus:
For the Cokin system [...] there Streulichtblenden to start. I have not, because I think that looks cheap. Bad combination, if it is not. ;-)
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
I'm sorry. Why do look like lens hood is good?
Antwort von Markus:
I am doing my synonymous sorry. ;-) (Sorry, but what can you say that).
Was perhaps not the right wording. I like it just do not. This statement would have probably made better.
Antwort von Ledwig:
But if I can achieve with an ugly camcorder better pictures, then I pull the front but of course! Those who watch the video that is what films and what you do not!
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
Then the little Kubrick said in Ledwig!
Antwort von Ledwig:
I've only been to express what matters are (should be !)...
I want to buy in the foreseeable future and indeed synonymous one polarizing filter for my NV-GS500, and in addition to my wide angle. Do I need is important to pay synonymous only to vignetting? There are no specials in this situation?
Antwort von digitalCat:
Some additional comments on statements in the preceding articles:
1. The clip Cokin sun visors have the advantage that you can still rotate the filter without dislocating the finger. When Cokin P system can even be used to insert each successive focal.
2. A polarizing filter never replace a lens hood, but rather provides for increased flare.
3. Polflter in conjunction with strong Weitwinkeln (shorter than 28mm for Small) often result in an ugly color and brightness over the sky as the blue sky light is polarized only within a relatively narrow viewing angle (and the only right angles to the sun)
Gruss, Hans-Dieter
