Frage von Auf Achse:
Hello!
Yesterday I saw a story about a motorcycle legend and have a few questions. The first five minutes were just the motorcyclist and his friend to speak, in between saw old shots. The subjects were interviewed s.unterschiedlichen locations, sometimes outside in the garden, then indoors in the parlor. Apparently synonymous s.mehreren days as synonymous the clothing was different.
The people changed the face several times, after five minutes came synonymous nor the ex-manager into the game and then were changed permanently the pages.
Am I right in thinking that the page for which one has chosen a person should STAY? And synonymous with the clothing, synonymous if it is a different day and a different place?
Thanks for your info,
On axis
Antwort von newsart:
Hi,
what "we" do "should", but there is virtually no "rules". That depends on the effect that you want to achieve.
The paging is really only really necessary if, for example in a survey several sound bites of different people are cut directly against one another, so that these sections do not confuse the viewer., So the picture does not "jump".
If you in the Orst angesprocheen report, page, and have gstört clothing exchange, you have you distracted from the actual content (what was said in the O-Sound). Now you can answer yourself, how to make it better, "should".
Antwort von Auf Achse:
The fact that both persons are not placed on the same page I think correctly, the page break has been bothering me personally. Especially when the manager walked in yet.
That there are no rules, I have often seen quite differently. I'm generally not a rider principles, but I want to find out whether there are for clothes / positioning rules for professional work. Which can be adjusted as needed if desired.
On axis
Antwort von Pianist:
I'm generally not a rider principles, but I want to find out whether there are for clothes / positioning rules for professional work. The rules are quite logical s.sich: Every effort must be made so that the narrative flow and promoted by the audience is not confused. If you have little confused, then there was just wrong.
In general I would say: If things are in the same context, they should synonymous rotated in the same context and are shown. So the same place, same lighting, same clothes. And if it matters that two parts of a report should be read in different contexts, then the levels must be synonymous differently rotated so s.verschiedenen places, possibly with different clothes and so next.
For example, if there is a report about a motorcycle tour, then the protagonist s.Anfang tell of course, the beginning of the tour. And if he then picks up again in the evening, he is somewhere else and the light is very different and he told then by the end of the tour. Later, the first recordings may only s.Anfang and the late recordings are used only s.Ende.
Or to make it simple: Always keep a clear line.
Matthias
Antwort von handiro:
any demigod here has even claimed that the good guy (protagonist) is always left and the evil (antagonist) is always right in the picture .... it would be a universal rule, as water is wet or night it is dark. I would say this: walking is shorter than übern mountain :-)
If it bothers something wrong if one does not notice because the content is so exciting, there is no preference.
I can not but think that as a professional only with the eye of the DP's watching and passing an obsession. I can understand completely! Then I would change but the industry ....
