Infoseite // Questions about the Panasonic HDC-SD9



Frage von christian31:


S.alle Hello!
Had a question on the Panasonic SD9!
It has just reached 3x560000 pixels and the Full HD resolution so using pixel shift (The heist so the picture simple raufgerechnet or?)

Dignity of man on a Full HD TV on any difference in video quality between the Panasonic SD9 or zbsp.einer Panasonic GS330 (3x 800,000 pixels) with the simple picture of Television on the full HD resolution raufgerechnet will recognize?

Or perhaps it would be the Canon HF100 is the better choice but it costs almost 150 euros more!
And if you know who owns who could tell me how to indoor low-light shots + the video quality of the SD9 to a Mini Dv (GS330 or similar) or compared with the HF100 are noted because it really such a difference to justify the price would be!

mfg christian31

Space


Antwort von Jan:

Hello,

the SD 9 Picture s.einem HD Television provides significantly better than the 330th GS I had already given the two previous times (SD 5 & GS 320) s.einen Full HD Television connected.

The GS 330 has always been hard but because their best connection to HD TV has S-video output. The SD 9, the higher the component cable, even better is the digital HDMI cable.

If you bendenkt that Panasonic SD 9 just so few Resolutionhat, the company must be congratulated on the final outcome. Canon Sonyand smile because, but for a PAL Camera SD 9 wins the right loose. It makes holding the electronics - if only synonymous "extrapolated" is.

JVC makes it synonymous but not better - the two companies want to stop with 3 CCD achieve a better color.

Panasonic Full HD is full of mischief, Panasonic SD 9 comes just at 500-600 line pairs horizontally - in 1440 they would need 720 - even there, they are miles away. 1920x1080 would have 960 line pairs times 540 line pairs - impossible with the equipment so as to create. A Panasonic GS 330 has more than 300 line pairs at Auflösungetest.

This is synonymous to the reason why an HDV Canon HV 20 & 30 Since much closer s.einer 1440er Resolutiondran than the SD 9 with their pseudo-full HD.

Full HD Consumer Primus Canon HF 10 & 100 just creates it with 730-740 line pairs, the 1440 world HDV to beat - if only just synonymous.

After my feelings when I would enter the following Lowlight.

1. Canon HF 100
2. just behind Panasonic GS 330
3. significantly behind Pabasonic SD 9

The SD 9 scores for me only in the color and the 5.1 sound to the 100th RF

VG
Jan

Space


Antwort von christian31:

Thank you Jan for your reply you would say the GS330 in the interior (+ Lowlight) a far better picture compared to the SD9 has (or at all hellers better video quality, that is about comparable with the GS80?)? So if the price of the HF100 ~ 150 Euro difference is probably justified to the Pana SD9

Space


Antwort von Jan:

Here are pictures of the test video asset for viewing:

SD 9

GS 330



Space


Antwort von CCD08:

Can all of AVCHD cameras Manufacturer only advise. Cameras are OK (have Panasonic SD9), but post is currently unresolved. Have attached HD Writer, The enclosed demo Pinnacle Studio 11.1, Magix video deluxe 2008 premium and Ulead VideoStudio 11.5 tested on Intel Quad and Vista SP1: HD Writer: Crashes, Pinnacle 11.1: Time Lapse with subsequent breastfeeding image for the rest of the scene, magix: Import as mpeg2 takes multiple times of the actual scene, then Sound / Picture Sync problems, Ulead Video Studio 11.5 Crashes in succession after a long period of many scenes to render in 90% of cases. If anything, just a lot of patience with Ulead video studio 11.5 apply. Vegas 8 is too expensive.

Not only the pixels machens but the workflow is synonymous to the movie playback. Recommendation HDV Camera to buy, as long as they do exist.

If there is high-resolution monitor: difference between normal DV and HD formats is very impressive and the future is HD.

Space


Antwort von CCD08:

link to test recording with SD9, converted with Ulead VideoStudio 11.5

http://rapidshare.com/files/117026634/Landesgartenschau_Bad_Rappenau_2008_First_Impressions.wmv

Space


Antwort von 02VideoFaBI:

An AVCHD Cam, I would not buy the case! Postprocessing is (almost) not possible, the quality is low due to high compression than HDV and me would be the SD9's too small!
The only thing we are currently in the HD field can only recommend that HDV is! The tape is easy ungeschalgen!
Canon HV30/20 or SonHC9 times because I want to mention.

I do not know how it is with the JVC HD7 of looks, which is so hard to drive and SD card to mpeg2 but ... hab synonymous but only heard of problems in order!

So: Take HDV, HDV, while it is still there!

mfg,
Fabian

Space


Antwort von gtom:

Well, generally it depends on the use s.wobei the SD9 at LowLight really has weaknesses, depending on the intended use, however, the AVCHD - Recording on the map is not necessarily bad. The SD9 is still in the "smallest" recording mode 6 1 / 2 hours of video on its 16GB card record. This material then is converted into MPEG2, at least in the amateur field DVD-compatible. Meanwhile the works synonymous AVCHD - import into the current half Programs. For ne private "HD" production always sufficient, as a plus point here is still extremely small type added - after all you can SD9 even in the smallest pocket and put ... :-) I have the SD9 now since 3 months of use (sports videos) and can not do anything negative to say ... AVCHD - Material do I convert with Nero and edit in MPEG2 with the Magix VDL2008, the time for the conversion when I save scenes choice that we must have some I do not tape via FireWire to the calculator I copy or move only the scenes really needed to the calculator ...
Gruss Thomas

Space


Antwort von markusmatthias:

Hello,
So I have the HDC-SD1, with 3x1 / 4 "CCD 's instead of 3x1 / 6" of the SD9, have a dual-core Opteron 170 @ 2GHz ram 2.8 GHz with an ATI 1950XT graphics card. The SD1 is at Lowlight always been praised, but no offers full HD, but only 1440x1080. I'm hochzufriden with my camera and with Pinnacle Studio 12 is the DV editing much less frustrating than with studio 11th As described I have no quad, but only an AMD Opteron Dual-Core, with the video editing is significantly more efficient Intel, at least for now. I took the test files synonymous Canon HF 100 and the Panasonic HDC-SD9 downloaded, so synonymous with my system can Studio 12 halfway reasonable deal. Perhaps we should not only to the processor ensuring modern graphics cards to be so with their GPU to the system also ordendlich at hand. I will soon be my system with an ATI 4870 upgrade, let's see how the performance improved.
Moreover, in various forums reported that the new Power Director 7 of CyberLink surprisingly well with AVCHD files, which is indeed hope for the future can
Greeting
Markus

Space



Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash