Frage von Christian Schroeder:
Werner Pentz wrote:
> Hi folks,
> What is actually muxen?
Is google. Short Form:
A muxer several things that makes one. Here a video - and
a Audiodate a file that contains both. Demuxer is the opposite.
> And how does it work?
With software.
> Probably say something like audio tracks of vidos edit.
> But what freeware program is recommended?
No, not edit, just zusammenfrickeln. Why do you want only muxen?
Then you have to have two separate files that can usually only has
if it has previously gedemuxt.
Mostly to do it this way: Record-> demuxer-> cut-> muxen.
--
Gruß Chris
Those who give up freedom in order to gain security will lose both
Antwort von Josef Moellers:
Christian Schroeder wrote:
Usually to do it this way: Record-> demuxer-> cut-> muxen.
Is synonymous:
Record -> cut -> demuxer (you need the 'rausgeschnittenen
Parts are not ge-demux-t) -> muxen (eg only the audio tracks that
you want) -> Authors -> ...
--
Josef Möllers (penguin keeper at FSC)
If failure had no penalty success would not be a prize
- T. Pratchett
Antwort von Günter_Hackel:
Werner Pentz wrote:
> Hi folks,
> What is actually muxen?
> And how does it work?
> Probably say something like audio tracks of vidos edit.
> But what freeware program is recommended?
> Danke
kopfschüttel!
what is muxen gibts überhaupt and the free
Pedestrian walk times and think about life after that you can do without
what it costs, every second that you s.Calculator sitting on the other hand, costs
Money.
gh
Antwort von Leonhard Fellermayr:
Hi Werner.
Werner Pentz wrote:
> Hi folks,
> What is actually muxen?
> And how does it work?
> Probably say something like audio tracks of vidos edit.
Not quite. Googling would have brought you more:
http://www.slashcam.de/dvfaq/FAQ-Frage_208.html
> But what freeware program is recommended?
I'm with the combination Cuttermaran PVAStrumento very satisfied. YMMV.
Greeting
Leo.
[1] http://www.cuttermaran.de/
[2] http://www.offeryn.de/dv.htm
Antwort von Henry Ipswich:
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 18:11:300100, Günter Hackel wrote:
> Go walking times and think about life after that you can do without
> What it costs, every second that you s.Calculator sitting on the other hand, costs
> Money.
In your case exorbitant sum ......
Antwort von Günter_Hackel:
Ipswich Henry wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 18:11:300100, Günter Hackel wrote:
>
>> Go walking times and think about life after that you can do without
>> What it costs, every second that you s.Calculator sitting on the other hand, costs
>> Money.
>
> In your case exorbitant sum ......
hach, du bube Poe, because you've given it to me but:)
Antwort von Christian Schroeder:
Josef Moellers wrote:
> Christian Schroeder wrote:
>
>> Most do you do this as follows: Record-> demuxer-> cut-> muxen.
>
> Is not synonymous:
> Record -> cut -> demuxer (you need the 'rausgeschnittenen
> Parts are not ge-demux-t) -> muxen (eg only the audio tracks that
> You want) -> Authors -> ...
Quark. Does not. Why should I synonymous after cutting or
demux, then immediately turn things without having to muxen? This results
but no sense. If you without first gedemuxt to have cut,
you will synchronize flutes.
--
Gruß Chris
Those who give up freedom in order to gain security will lose both
Antwort von Alfred Slotosch:
Christian Schroeder wrote:
>
> Quark. Does not. Why should I synonymous after cutting or
> Demux, then immediately turn things without having to muxen? This results
> But does not make sense. If you without first gedemuxt to have cut,
> You go to synchronize flutes.
>
I can not let stand. My Topfield 5000 PVR features
a *. rec file on the hard drive on. I process this as follows: rec ->
cut -> mpg -> Authoring -> DVD. As is synonymous with me without Demuxxen
unsynchron nothing and I save a lot of time and space on the
hard drive, as only one instead of three intermediate files are created. I
only with the transport stream from Topfield tested but you should
synonymous with other receivers times examine whether Demuxxen not only
Posturing is. If the passages with ProjectX and mplex
omit reduces the Bearbeitunhszeit on my old
Athlon computer for more than half.
Alfred
Antwort von Alfred Slotosch:
Detlef Wirsing wrote:
>
> I suppose of a D-Box 2 with udrec to muxe the result and
> Cut only with Wombles MPEG Video Wizard. There is nothing
> Asynchronously. Sure, it might be rubbish software, which streams gemuxte not
> Can be cut correctly. The stop should be disposed of and what is
> Obtain reasonable.
>
How can you udrec demuxer. If the Video Wizard lets everything synchronously,
can the Muxen after udrec omitted. If you can udrec demux,
you can use Cuttermaran synonymous. Expected Cuttermaran yes
Elementary streams. The subsequent Multiplexing for dvdauthor tmpenc -
may be synonymous Cuttermaran after cutting it. This is mplex
integrated. I use to cut dvbcut. There's recently
synonymous for Windows. It is has not as many gimmicks as
Cuttermaran that converts it for cutting a transport stream in
an MPG file, which is an authoring program with it to DVD
can process. Frame Just cut it übgrigens synonymous. A
similar program, which I have not tested, is mpeg2cut2.
However, it can not s.den interfaces recoding, so that the
Cut only s.Gopgrenzen possible.
Gruß Alfred
Antwort von Alfred Slotosch:
Werner Pentz wrote:
>
> Till now, I'm still not phased come next.
> Cuttermaran've downloaded, but needs framework, synonymous
> Downloaded, will not do.
> Dan pvastreamer who do not read.
> Now I have downloaded tmpgEncNet, hopefully it das
>
Cuttermaran still requires the Helix YV12 codec or DivX. If you are with
The media player included in the AVI file and play it
flashes briefly on the Cuttermaran icon, then everything is ok. You get
an error message, you must have one of the two codecs
install. The Helix is freeware, at DivX, I am not with
sure. Otherwise, I can not synonymous you help me läufts halt.
On www.movie2digital.de you will find a forum where the author mitliest.
Gruß Alfred
Antwort von Alfred Slotosch:
Detlef Wirsing wrote:
> Udrec demuxt not, it muxt just not like other car
> Streaming engines, eg Wingrab. Cuttermaran is much more cumbersome
> As the MPEG Video Wizard. The Navigiation is slow and complicated,
> Preview something bigger than a thumbnail.
>
I do not know udrec, but I have on the Page of Harald Mayß
read about "saving the raw Paketized Elementary
Streams (PES) or transport stream (TS) of the DBox2 on a PC. "
Since I assume that it synonymous with the program transport streams
on the PC can store and there is no multiplexing. The video
Wizard can, according to the website transport streams intersect,
therefore, it surprised me that you have multiplext. But maybe
Harald Mayß with the quoted sentence misleading words.
Gruß Alfred
Antwort von Josef Moellers:
Christian Schroeder wrote:
> Josef Moellers wrote:
>
>> Christian Schroeder wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Most do you do this as follows: Record-> demuxer-> cut-> muxen.
>>
>> Is not synonymous:
>> Record -> cut -> demuxer (you need the 'rausgeschnittenen =
>> Parts are not ge-demux-t) -> muxen (eg only the audio tracks that =
>> you want) -> Authors -> ...
>
>
> Quark. Does not. Why should I synonymous after cutting or
> Demux, then immediately turn things without having to muxen? The ergib =
t
> But does not make sense. If you without first gedemuxt to have cut,
> You go to synchronize flutes.
Of course, that perhaps I was unhappy ausgedrück =
t:
I mark the places that I 'would like to have in rausgeschnitten
ProjectX and then start the demuxer. ProjectX skips areas =
,
I do not want to have.
Then I choose the audio tracks that I would like to have, and let z. =
B.
the TTX muxe away and then again with mplex.
--
Josef Möllers (penguin keeper at FSC)
If failure had no penalty success would not be a prize
- T. Pratchett
