Frage von piano:
Hello,
end of the year we shoot a feature film on DV (Panasonic DVX100). With the camera we already have experience, but we have let the whole Fazen never followed on film. So here the question:
What should / we need to consider when rotation / in the post, if we want to Fazen afterwards without any problems on 35mm?
I thank you ever taken anyone who takes the short time to respond.
Gruss
Antwort von AMH:
That the whole thing on her 24p / s lowers ;-)
Antwort von Markus:
Hello,
if you rotate the avatar in 25p mode, the material can be easily of imaging on film (24p). The film then runs slightly slower (almost an inverted
PAL-Speedup).
Was allerdings sehr problematisch ist, ist die Resolution! 720×576 Bildpunkte wollen als 35 mm-Film auf einer großen Kinoleinwand einfach nicht überzeugen. Hier wäre eine HDV -Camera schon besser geeignet, aber immer noch nicht optimal.
Nützlicher link to dem Thema:
College Movie: "High-resolution video for movies?"
Antwort von AMH:
The quality of digital material that was blown up to 35 mm is generally not very good.
With HDV, has this been going. But I do not think that there would be enough ne FX1 already.
Gruss
Alex
Antwort von Axel:
Hello,
end of the year we shoot a feature film on DV (Panasonic DVX100). With the camera we already have experience, but we have let the whole Fazen never followed on film. So here the question:
What should / we need to consider when rotation / in the post, if we want to Fazen afterwards without any problems on 35mm?
I thank you ever taken anyone who takes the short time to respond.
Gruss In addition to the technical conditions (after all,, your camera rotates gradually, and there were even movies for that rotated's Movies), you should primarily aesthetic change to the limitations posed by lower PAL Resolutionvon in Comparison to 35mm with him. Panoramic, extreme lowlight, reveling in finely engraved structures (spider web against the light, goose bumps, etc.) are NOs. The action should take the film (good example: "The fat years ..."). 24 or 25 pictures are for modern film projectors no longer an issue. Even if a film in 24 instead of the original 25 images is shown, the viewer notices no difference, only the period is extended by four percent.
Antwort von JANP:
Hello
if you want Fazen on 35mm, you must already have a camera with
more pixeling take. Dvx100 has 3 times the 430,000 pixel.
Canon XL2 has 3 times the 800,000 pixels. Since I Bildquailität
The DVX must say that I know of a small hand-of panasonic camcorder NV-eg GS140EG-S has a better image quality.
Thus a small camcorder for 600 ¬ 800,000 has already 3 times!
Otherwise turn to only in HD. because the company that makes the Fazen the
dv pal film extrapolated to hdv. the result is catastrophic.
You can wahrschienlich in the cinema just something from the last row
. recognize
Antwort von DNO:
Hello,
We let SD DV material (Based with XL1) for a cinema commercial on 35mm Fazen.
The result is perfectly in the movie.
If you see takes into account the comments of others komentator (NOs)
In terms of Resolutionnatürlich can not compete with an HD recording.
Here is the link relating to: www.bewegtebilder-digital.de
The cost of the Fazen and the studio costs (audio is processed separately wg. Term Accommodation 4%) are for nen 30sec. Spot early as the 4-digit euro range.
Greeting dno
Antwort von Markus:
Dvx100 has 3 times the 430,000 pixel.
Canon XL2 has 3 times the 800,000 pixels. An SD picture always returns only (720 × 576 =) 414,720 pixels, no preference how many pixels the image sensor has. In the optimal case, a sub-pixel calculation is used, but that does not s.der final image size of 720 × 576 pixels.
