Logo Logo
/// 
slashcam Camc. Vergleich - FX 1

Slashcam Camc. Comparison - FX 1



Frage von Frank B.:
Februar 2007

Hello,

among techn. Data in Slashcam - camcorder comparison is that the FX 1 no manual aperture setting would have. What's up? My but has an aperture scheme!

Frank



Antwort von Bernd E.:

Next few lines above in the same list is synonymous correctly so that the Aperture manual can be set. This contradiction is not the only flaw in this overview camcorder, so such a thing before purchasing a rather more times with other sources!

Gruß Bernd E.



Antwort von rudi:

Give us just a short notice, please, if your a mistake like this will ...

In these volumes of data it is clear that occasionally a typo somewhere in there, we obviously like to correct, if we know them. Incidentally, even the technical specifications of the manufacturer is not always accurate, so we often referred to as synonymous hook them. And of course we would look if the database is useful for many people is ...

Many greetings

Rudi





Antwort von Jan:

Rudi Yes, just go to Sony.De, the failure rate for digicams and video cameras is quite high. Especially bad for the comparisons of the cameras.

I think our error rate is rather low. In 1000ten of error contributions are not excluded.

VG
Jan



Antwort von Genorade:

"Jan" wrote:

I think our error rate is rather low. In 1000ten of error contributions are not excluded.

VG
Jan


Ähh Jan, I think Rudi related to the information on the



Antwort von Frank B.:

Did I already thought that it was a mistake that must be.
A typo, it is not, however, since you do not simple 4 wrong buttons on the word "No" can be put together, if it were actually "Yes" should stand. It is either a research or Schusseligkeitsfehler. Faulty research may not be synonymous, because in fact, next up a correct reference to the existing aperture function is - thank you Bernd, I have my scatterbrained did not immediately noticed.
So Conclusion: A Schusseligkeitsfehler (can always happen), but when such an important feature to have one or the other could influence purchasing decisions. Thus, my demand.
My choices do I never of a single test or a source of information-dependent.
And again to clarify: Your comparison is unique and I was (despite the error) a great help in making decisions for the 1st FX

Gruß Frank



Antwort von Jan:

I meant it in general on our forum.

And who usually writes little less synonymous error.

Just have a look at Sony.de - what the company so nice camera for making comparisons.

VG
Jan




Antworten zu ähnlichen Fragen:
Slashcam Camc. Comparison - FX 1
Good old Slashcam
I've now Slashcam birthday ;-)
Christmas greetings of slashCAM
Viruses on slashCAM
How do I delete my account at slashCAM?
At slashCAM because>> slashCAM Mobile <<
In eigener Sache: slashCAM for mobile devices
In eigener Sache: slashCAM on Twitter
CES slashCAM camcorder models in the database
Thanks s.blip (slashCAM)!
Burglary in the Slashcam editorial - request for your help
THE THING - Storyboard to Film Comparison
Batman: The Dark Knight - Storyboard to Film Comparison
a7S vs GH4 vs NX1: 4k UltraHD Video Camera Comparison
Bestenliste slashcam
Was ich an Slashcam mag
Into the Badlands Bericht (Slashcam)
slashCAM - dunkler Forumstil
Neuer slashcam bug?
SPAM auf Slashcam
SLASHCAM-Forum ... Luft raus?
Frohes Fest wünscht slashCAM
Slashcam - versteckte Nerv-Werbung?
Auflösungscharts hier bei SlashCAM
Frohe Weihnachten wünscht slashCAM

















weitere Themen:
Spezialthemen


16:9
ARD
AVCHD
AVI
Adobe After Effects
Adobe Premiere Pro
After effects
Apple Final Cut Pro
Audio
Avid
Cam
Camcorder
Camera
Canon
Capture
Capturing
Clip
EOS
Editing
Effect
Error
Export
File
Files
Film
Final Cut
Format
Formate
HDR
Import
JVC
Layer
Light
MAGIX video deLuxe
Magix
Microphone
Monitor
Movie
PC
Panasonic
Pinnacle
Pinnacle Studio
Player
Premiere
RAM
RED
Recording
Red
Software
Sony
Sound
Studio
TV
Tape
Video
Videos