Logo Logo
/// 
Sony Vegas Full-HD Export für YouTube

Sony Vegas Full-HD export for YouTube



Frage von kgerster:
September 2010

I experimented a little with a suitable full-HD quality for YouTube to reach at the lowest possible file size.

1) Export as MPEG 2, so to speak as a reference. As expected, flawless. 165 MB file size but a minute. Render time: Approx: 2:50

2) Export as SonyAVC/MP4 "at a bit rate of 4000th Filesize 30MB/Minute about. Picture is very contrasting and somewhat grainy. Many artifacts. Very rough picture during fast movements. Render time: Approx: 5:50 unusable.

3) Export as WMV also at 4000th Also about 30MB/Minute. Picture ok. A little softer than the original. Hardly artifacts. Very useful Picture. But strangely opaque (which is not s.der Bitrate s.Encoder but is Sony Vegas). Render time: around 11:30

So the same with the HD-Video Converter Xilisoft of've repeatedly. Output file was the MPEG-2 file with 165 MB

1) output as MP4 (again bitrate 4000): unusable as in Sony Vegas.

2) Output as WMV: Almost the same as Sony Vegas, but better contrast (as in the original file). perfect for the purpose.

So I will in future only the video as MPEG-2 and then output in the HD-Video Converter with 5000 MBit spend as WMV. Render time together about 9 minutes. YouTube handles WMV files synonymous fairly clean (synonymous when it is re-encoded).

I noticed the improved quality of WMV files at high compression on previously. This is still a WMV that requires less computing power and often synonymous smoothly on older machines running.



Antwort von deti:

What are you doing there is total rubbish - the apparent improvement is at the expense of all image details.
Just a render into equal with the codec "SonyAVC" or "Main Concept H.264 format in 1920x1080 with 25FPS H.264 Main Profile (CABAC encoded as the SonyAVC codec) with 8-10Mbit / s and you should have a clean presentation have.

Deti



Antwort von kgerster:

To the best option was not synonymous. Then I could move like an MPEG-2 file high. I wanted to try out where the line is. And oddly enough, the lower limit for WMV and MPEG4 / AVC is apparently different.

To test this further, I have exported a small test file as a WMV AVC with 8000 and with 5000th The WMV file is a clear artifacts on less. I would like to synonymous without detours directly from Vegas to WMV. Only see the files of Color and contrast is not the same.

In order to examine the lack of details I have statues of the original file with which the after use of the Xilisoft converter) WMV file compared AB (. Color and contrast absolutely identical. Picture impression slightly worse and definitely better than the AVC file with 8000th And the WMV file is still 37.5% less synonymous.





Antwort von deti:

Well, then you were the first to WMV or VC-1 over H.264 provides an advantage. As always synonymous - as it works for you.

Deti



Antwort von kgerster:

Just try. Is reproducible.

If I still knew the ability to influence color and contrast when exporting to WMV directly from Vegas and what it was that in this case, the picture differs Sun.



Antwort von Marco:

I've tried it and stay with AVC. I content myself with Youtube videos to please the audience but with 1280x720. Since AVC at a data rate ranges of 6-7 Mbit / s.

Marco
www.vegasvideo.de



Antwort von kgerster:

@ Marco

Tells you why the WMV export differs in Vegas so?



Antwort von deti:

@ Kgerster:

Could you ever link one of your videos on YouTube here?

Deti



Antwort von Marco:

I do not think that the WMV export differs from about contrasts, but it's probably more the decoding in other programs. Testing times in the export of Vegas over the original.

Marco



Antwort von kgerster:

I have sometimes exaggerated the matter and an export with 2000 kb / s made. Since it is abundantly clear. The difference is synonymous at 5000 kb / s to see. The have the files on an FTP loaded because the re-rendering it again on YouTube distorted. Please not the contents.

www.schollmann.de/media/ohne_titel.mp4

www.schollmann.de / media / ohne_titel.wmv

The small file size with relatively good quality is synonymous useful for delivery of files and clippings. I had a friend abroad always sent via e-mail excerpts, which he then viewed on an LCD TV. As a WMV that was fully in order. When not at MP4.



Antwort von deti:

Hm .. So the WMV sequence stops with me both as synonymous with VLC Windows Media Player for about 1 second while the MP4-13-second sequence goes through. Something is not right there.

Deti



Antwort von Marco:

I'm with the WMV file the same problems. Either the playback stops after 1 seconds s.oder the program hangs. The WMV is also not 1920x1080, but 1440x1080.

Marco



Antwort von deti:

... And frankly, we already have to choose deliberately unfavorable parameters to achieve in such a poor quality as H.264 with you.

This time the Comparison of two files I created directly by Sony Vegas Pro 9.0e:

http://131.159.15.130/v/720p-WindowsMediaVideo-V11-2Mbit.wmv
http://131.159.15.130/v/720p-MainConcept-AVC-2Mbit.mp4

Here one can clearly see that even a little bigger unusual WMV file contains less picture detail than the MP4 file.

Deti



Antwort von kgerster:

Yes, in the example, it is so. Here is the WMV synonymous not so "milky". However, I used synonymous Vegas Movie Studio 10 HD. Get with the times to test Vegas 9 Pro.



Antwort von kgerster:

Sony Vegas Pro 9e true for me identical to 10th Movie Studio And if they are always very much moved, or pans. The source material is of a XR500VE (1080i). Also in Pro 9e, the WMVs are milky.

@ Deti The quality of your export at 2Mbit I get out in any case. At 720p it is better but not very good.

As always synonymous. We do not want to continue the infinite.




Antworten zu ähnlichen Fragen:
sony vegas 9 and YouTube optimize, how?
Sony Vegas Full-HD export for YouTube
AAF export in Sony Vegas Pro 13
AAF export in Sony Vegas Pro 13
Probleme beim Render von Sony Vegas 13 und Upload bei Youtube
Premiere Pro CS4 welche Einstllungen für YouTube & Co Export ?
Weiss wird bei Export auf Youtube grau / Titelproblem mit Rändern
Sony a7s II 4k intern full HD extern
sony vegas 12 oder 13
Verpixeln in Sony Vegas
Sony Vegas 13 Abstürze
Sony Xperia X SMartphone mit Hitzeproblemen bei Full HD 60p
verarscht mich Sony Vegas 10?
Sony Vegas 13 Pro - 2 Fragen
Sony Vegas - Frameserver Probleme
Cubase 7 vs. Sony Vegas Pro 13
Full HD-Actioncam für 219 Euro -- Sony AS50 // CES 2016
CES: Neue Sony Actioncams -- X1000 filmt in 4K/UHD, AS200 Full HD
Laptop Kaufberatung Sony Vegas 13. PRO
Sony Vegas ruckelt in der Vorschau
Aufsteigende Zahl - Sony Vegas Pro
Sony Vegas Pro 11 auf Mac
Sony Vegas 7 und falscher Ton
sony vegas pro 15 - zwei tonspuren synchronisieren.
wackel/zoom effekt mit sony vegas
Audio-Mastering mit Sony Vegas Pro 14

















weitere Themen:
Spezialthemen


16:9
ARD
AVCHD
AVI
Adobe After Effects
Adobe Premiere Pro
After effects
Apple Final Cut Pro
Audio
Avid
Cam
Camcorder
Camera
Canon
Capture
Capturing
Clip
EOS
Editing
Effect
Error
Export
File
Files
Film
Final Cut
Format
Formate
HDR
Import
JVC
Layer
Light
MAGIX video deLuxe
Magix
Microphone
Monitor
Movie
PC
Panasonic
Pinnacle
Pinnacle Studio
Player
Premiere
RAM
RED
Recording
Red
Software
Sony
Sound
Studio
TV
Tape
Video
Videos



update am 16.September 2019 - 18:02
slashCAM
ist ein Projekt der channelunit GmbH
*Datenschutzhinweis*