Infoseite // SonyHDR-FX1 searched REVIEWS



Frage von _L_:


Hi together
I'm new here and have the same synonymous my first question:
I'm considering the SonyHDR-FX1 to buy. Is there somewhere on the Internet free test reports? In fine, I just google references to magazines.

Thanks in advance
_l_

Space


Antwort von Bruno Peter:

http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Sony-Announces-High-Definition1080i-HDR-FX1-First-3- CMOS - HDV Camcorders.htm

http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Sony-Announces-High-Definition1080i-HDR-FX1-First-3- CMOS - HDV Camcorders.htm

http://www.eidomedia.com/hdve/ziess_fuji.htm

http://www.videofreunde.de/thread.php?threadid=6110&boardid=15&sid=41a9710fabd2073bbd6c618558b69650

In VIDEOMEDIA July / August 2005 Page 20 to 23 You will find something synonymous ...

Space


Antwort von Moka:

Here you will find that synonymous (the Z1 tests are at the hardware part, so far as synonymous for the FX1):
http://dv.camcorder.sony.slashcam.de/Hardware-Camcorders-Sony-Links.html#k859

Space


Antwort von _L_:

Hi Together
Thanks for the links. The reports are not exactly good, as I have understood this ...

Would be to wait still synonymous ne time, until the technology is mature ...

Thanks anyway
_l_

Space


Antwort von WeiZen:

"_l_" Wrote: Hi Together
Thanks for the links. The reports are not exactly good, as I have understood this ...

Would be to wait still synonymous ne time, until the technology is mature ...

Thanks anyway
_l_


Moin,
first
http://www.canopus-foren.de/wbb2/thread.php?postid=81657 # post81657
everything else is synonymous garbage, which is in the reports. Lubrication, the formation of the artifacts come to 99% of the vision device, which has too slow response times and / or problems in scaling, since probably never came a 1080-line monitor for watching.
In the same threat up something deeper appears the following:

Quote: I have about the same time, FX-1 material in the movies (about 12 Wall) seen exposed on film. Since the Sony has even fallen man by my side of chair.

I have a them and repeat them any more! Viewed on a 1080i CRT TV of JVC.

Space


Antwort von Bruno Peter:

Quote: ... there probably never be a 1080-line monitor for watching came.

For me an HDTV will ReadyHD with 1366 x 768px is used, probably a Philips unit. The unit must be synonymous nor the next 10 years PAL DV in good quality must be able to upscale.

The device may get problems with the HDV material FX1/HC1, after what you write here?

Space


Antwort von WeiZen:

Moin,
If difficulties, with any HD material. Also, the material from the ASTRA HD channel, soccer, shows that when smearing was swung across the square.
Bruno buying a tube TV of JVC, which gets your DV material synonymous better. Indeed, it must be enlarged to 1366 x 768px. This may not look good. (Tuts synonymous not) When I see a 16:9 movie in ÖR that send so with much higher bit rates than the private, then roared badly not Unifarbenbereich. From the DVD, it is better, but that can synonymous at the "noise reduction" are in the player. When I have a D-SAT film on DVD the same burn, then the synonymous looks better at a time.

Space


Antwort von Bruno Peter:

I have already this device:
http://www.hifi-regler.de/shop/philips/philips_37_pf_9986_perlweiss-silber.php
looked at closer, synonymous with 16:9 DV with my DVDs and PAL broadcasts. I liked it very well ... Also, the next larger unit was fine.
The HTV broadcasts of DVB-S were, of course, still much better.

I am not there gucke only upward HDV / HDTV, but synonymous to the backwards compatibility to DV-PAL!

Space


Antwort von WeiZen:

"Bruno Peter" wrote: I have already this device:
I am not there gucke only upward HDV / HDTV, but synonymous to the backwards compatibility to DV-PAL!

Moin,
Posting of the above as you see me, I am synonymous. And that is synonymous important.
onvielleicht I see more than others, or disturbs me more than others, but a PLASMA or LCD TV, the SD picture I like, I've never seen before - and I saw hundreds of possessions.
Conversely, down of a high Resolutionauf lower, that still goes on as HDV Sharp plasma 720, which was ondas SD picture I could not see, unfortunately. A propos Sharp. The units of which at Cebit I liked, but since nothing has been transmitted from the TV is not synonymous therefore comparable. I say tube TV. For 950 ¬ you can not go far wrong. The link http://jdl.jvc-europe.com/product.php?id=HV-32P40BJ&catid=100044 (Only about Komponennteneingang genuine unscaled HDV signal, different format http://jdl.jvc-europe.com/files/techspec/04jdl-farbfernsehgerate1.pdf)

Space



Space


Antwort von Bruno Peter:

Probably you are right, you should buy the JVC TV, DV-PAL is definitely very good, even HDV can look it ...., and also for large screen enjoyment (with HDV), a video projector. So that it covers the whole range from very inexpensive. Dread to think the whole time s.so a jumbo television to ....

Which projector would you recommend, and I at my place vielelcht to 1.5 to max. Projecting 2.0 meters width would be?

Space


Antwort von WeiZen:

Moin,
I can not because the apartment was not suitable for it, attic, I always ignore these devices.

Space


Antwort von motiongroup:

Quote: everything else is synonymous garbage, which is in the reports. Lubrication, the formation of the artifacts come to 99% of the vision device, which has too slow response times and / or problems in scaling, since probably never came a 1080-line monitor for watching.


Finally has a little idea how it looks, it is hard to comprehend how much Schmarn in the magazines will be distributed and how many lemmings there are in awe with the plunge into the abyss

Space


Antwort von WeiZen:

"motion group" wrote: Finally has a little idea how it looks, it is hard to comprehend how much Schmarn in the magazines will be distributed and how many lemmings there are in awe with the plunge into the abyss

Moin,
Thank you.

Space


Antwort von GhostDog:

I was myself an owner until recently a FX1, because of - in my opinion, serious - design flaw I have with my reseller can now exchange it for a Z1. The problem: The display shows only 80% of the FX1 (!) Of the recorded image. In practice this means for filmmakers who choose the cut-aware that they have to throw in the processing on the computer 20% of the coveted HDV Resolutionwieder into the trash. A sound justification for this "specification" (as Switzerland, Sony put it) sent me to this day no one can deliver. Given the output media (computers, projectors, HDTV-ready and screens) makes the argument "safetey zone" no longer makes sense. So only the Conclusion is that the FX1 buyers the frustrated customer of a new product are not yet mature is (s.Nachfolgemodell Z1 the problem so more rough than fixed).

Space


Antwort von WeiZen:

Moin,
here are a few FX1 Test Files:
http://www.hd-channel.com/index.html?/programme.html

Space


Antwort von Markus:

"Christoph" wrote: The display shows only 80% of the FX1 (!) Of the recorded image ...
For further reading:
" slashCAM Forum: SonyHDR FX1 with faulty
" Video Forum: SonyHDR FX1 design flaws

"Ulrich" wheat "" wrote: [Beamer] ... because the apartment was not suitable for this, attic, I always ignore these devices.
I imagine very comfortable reclining seats in front ... that would have something almost of holiday! ;-)

Space


Antwort von WeiZen:

"Markus" wrote: "Ulrich" wheat "" wrote: [Beamer] ... because the apartment was not suitable for this, attic, I always ignore these devices.
I imagine very comfortable reclining seats in front ... that would have something almost of holiday! ;-)


was once synonymous. With HDV, one could think about it again.
So who knows a display monitor with 1920x1080? If anything, it already.

Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash