Frage von Yellowstone:
Hello
I am looking in the price range of 500 euro a camcorder with memory card.
Since I currently have neither a Flachbildfernesher have Blue Ray, I wonder whether it is worthwhile to have the HD set, or even prefer to stay in SD.
How good is the quality of the Sony If you go to SD filming what he can be so?
To what would you advise me?
Greetings Andi
Antwort von RickyMartini:
I know the SR12. The SD video in MPEG2 are not as heady, but should suffice as far.
However, the picture quality of Sony (in HD) in low-light part of horrors, as the picture begins to swim Geren and in some areas of the image only a soup is to be seen. They proceed to the AF of the Sony very happy when panning, which makes them unusable IMO AF.
For IHC SD150 can not say anything.
The Canon HF100 can I buy a clear recommendation, because their images are clear and sharp and the AF is not so "stupid" safe.
If SD is desired, it is out of the HD material is still win.
In SD to make shooting with an HD camcorder really does not make sense anymore.
Antwort von Yellowstone:
Hi
Thank you first
Would it be a problem of the films in HD convert to SD?
If my calculator Duo 6600.4 GB, 786 MB of graphics 250 GB FP überhaupt sufficient to cover all the manageable amount in tempo to make?
Antwort von RickyMartini:
Your PC is sufficient slack in favor of taking another big hard drive (external is the same) would not be bad, but there are some s.Videodaten incurred.
"Canopus Edius NEO" for the cut in my opinion the best choice, since very performant, stable, and the export possibilities are very umfachgreich (s.ca. 80 ¬).
Antwort von Yellowstone:
Thank you
If the quality of the umcodieren actually worse on SD and if so synonymous worse than a good SD Camera?
Antwort von RickyMartini:
The picture is much clearer and sharper, because the SD models due to the much lower resolution details "zuschmieren" - just as the staircase effect (Alias | Wavefront Mayaing) when scaling to a video monitor of equal resolution.
