I've been a lot about the two cameras to read and I can not decide whether I use the 200-300 euros for the SR11 should invest or not. I'm an ambitious amateur filmmaker and would like for the next 5 years a decent device.
What specifically are the disadvantages of SR10? By this I mean not the bare facts, but the impact that the differences with facilities bring. Are the stills of SDR11 really so much better that on trips on his digital camera could renounce? What has the better chip for benefits?
Thanks for your answers!
Antwort von stepa:
Hi, I have the SR11 and SR10 was tested in MM.
The SR10 is a camera for those who makes no big claims. The recordings are synonymous good, but come in my opinion, not s.die the SR11/12 approached.
Also I remember to have that they do not synonymous additional viewfinders, which is just a lot of sunlight at a disadvantage.
The display is actually rather standard, while the SR11/12, at the moment the measure of all things represent. The best course I recommend a try. Some might say that to me enough that others are demanding more. This must each decide for themselves. I would too simple.
The pictures, incidentally, the SR11 much better and sharper, but not comparable with a good digicam. When daylight succeed is still very good pictures with less light, you can forget it.
If you have a decent device that looks like writing, then I would have the money to spend for an SR11. The additional price for the SR12's worth, I think not, as the SR11, with the larger hard drive is the same.
The SR11 is 7.5 hours in Full HD, I think that's enough, and there is even more the memory sticks.