will grant me the dates and times a camcorder in the research, I am on the XR SonyHDR hit 550, which has so consistently get very good reviews.
I wanted to rush to the dealer and make the purchase, as he told me that it was on the way out, he could not order it anymore. Sony is said to bring in a few weeks, the successor to the market. This has confused me and I have not bought the camcorder for now.
Unfortunately, that was already synonymous everything that he can tell me why I want sometimes questions: Does anyone who brings significant innovations with the successors to and what is the name at all? Have been on the website of Sony looking for, but I find myself as a piglet in the segment to be honest not quite manage.
How does this technology cost? One can assume that the model costs about the same amount, ie between 900 and ¬ 1000?
Well, as already is the title: Should I wait for the successor, or even see that I get the current model?
Would be grateful for any tip!
Antwort von Jan:
a new model of this XR series is no longer the new XR 160 (two classes below) is the only new hard drive HD camera in the area.
New to CX is 690/700 in the 690 lacks GPS and 96GB of internal memory (690 no internal memory - only slot for MS Pro Duo, SD / HC / XC cards), otherwise they are identical.
An important feature is the 50 or 25 full-screen mode, an improved wide-angle (26.3 mm) and a higher data rate of 28 Mbit / sec.
The new products have to manual focus (peaking) and fitted to the image control (Zebra), I'm not sure off the cuff, if the old models that had been synonymous.
Otherwise, they are almost identical.
CX 690 = 1199 ¬ CX 700 = 1399 ¬
The price is thus as is usual for Newcomers located well above the old models, if we compare the current price.
One should not wait for a laboratory test that can definitely not wait long in coming.
Some sony interested, especially the price-conscious to be secure but the older models. Excluding sports enthusiasts (50 P mode).
Antwort von mammut:
I would wait, and that next month are so many new devices or are already tested (see the recent tests here at Slashcam).
Antwort von Büschel:
50p brings only benefits. Those who still do now buy an outdated pseudo-top-model, which is only capable of interlaced has himself to blame.
Sonyhat had for years not even 25p, now they are equal with 50p. Is something. So definitely worth the wait. And the higher price the progress made in each case are worth. The interlaced crap is finally abolished.
Antwort von Peter.Wurst:
Thank you for the detailed answers!
What should be this 50p? What is better to be seen? And why Interlaced is bad?
Apart from this, but nothing speaks against the "old man".
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... What should be this 50p? What is better to be seen? And why is interlaced bad? ...
Interlaced is not of a priori bad, otherwise it would not be still and to further the dominant standard in the TV area in both the production as synonymous with the broadcast. Only just now has a recording of progressive house from certain advantages, and if you have a moving subject with 50 frames / sec. able to record, which of course brings a better quality than when only 25 fps. are. With "only" 25p or 50i can certainly synonymous work well, but the best is the enemy of good is well known. For further reading if interested: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeilensprungverfahren http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Scan