Actually I wanted to today SonyHVR-V1 growth - but then I saw the article on Slashcam about the seemingly disastrous artifacts in CMOS sensors. Since the V1 also has sensors on these and I'm not every day the money for a camera of this class had left, I would like to know if I should steer clear of it should be ('m in such amounts may be unsettling:)), According to this article because CMOS cams so only on the tripod to be operated.
Antwort von WoWu:
Sit back down .... ... there are at least as many ... and substantive articles, the effect of sharpness can not confirm. Sure, in a rice-turn will always have any artifacts on .... if they ever used to be. Apart from this, can you figure out at which angular velocity, which is offset at a sampling of 6x60 images = 240 images / sec. arises. That is for most swing speeds less than the interlace Verkammung.
I have calmed down but the realization that an identical film cameras shutter principle use .... and there has never before zurückgezuckt someone, so it is not to buy. Or are you in any movie ever noticed such artifacts?
Such articles should be very skeptical about. (But of course, good articles do not rate .... and it only makes sense to search for work ...)
Antwort von WoWu:
... Typing errors, which must, of course, 4 x 60 hot.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... Article on Slashcam about the seemingly disastrous artifacts in CMOS sensors ... CMOS cameras are only on the tripod to be operated.
I did this article have not yet read, but if drinsteht that CMOS camcorder only on the tripod should be operated, then ignore this simple: Of course, you can easily synonymous the V1 from the hand set. It is always good to know where the pros and cons of a technology, but not every conceivable "deficiency" occurs in the daily practice of interfering in appearance. So, get the part and have fun, to shoot!