Infoseite // Sonyversus Pana (; Consumer) - what with what?



Frage von MiniBob:


Hello dear people.
I'm planning for a long time to get back zuzulegen a camera. And I need your help because I am no longer on the state of affairs.
I'm trying to make short:

- Sonyoder Panasonic (and no, Canon, JVC)

The new 2010 device sounds quite interesting, as WW and optimized image stabilization, etc.

Note: I used Sony (; had then been disappointed after some time of the VERY Batteries - so I had then vowed never to buy so more a Sonyzu - but time heals wounds, but a few times now and Sonybietet else .. ).

You might want to:

Sony: CX 305
CX 550 (; is) over budget

Panasonic: SD66 (; TM60)
SD707

Important to me is a really good image stabilization, because I think with the small Handycam is the worst of these shaky movies! (; That one always needs to optimize the cutting everything back to some / elimnieren ....)

I have read, the time has Sonydie best Image Stabilization.

The important thing else is the new ERP.

And shooting in Low Light / Darkness!

Unfortunately, this has only Sony NightShot function, and now no longer synonymous CX305 Model!
I had this really NightShot then used a lot (: at night!).
I would do without now, for the CS550 is too expensive.

: QUESTIONS

What is the LowLight behavior and opportunities for the two models PANASONIC? (; Makes use of the lamp even slightly s.der SD66 (; TM60)?)

How good or bad is really the Bildsatbilisierung at Panasonic in comparison with Sony?

If the SonyCX505/520 perhaps better, as with NightShot - if you then have to buy another WW Ausatz (; or too complicated)? In addition, the Bildstbilisierung of 2009 is no worse than the 2010 devices? (;) = Disadvantage

Unfortunately Sonykeinen's windscreen for Micro :-(;
But (; halbechte) slow motion for 3 Sec. :-)

Pana is favorable and should be good - but without NightShot without optim. Bildstabiliserung?

And anyway: What is with the battery in Comparison?

Sigh, I think I've written too much, ne?
Nevertheless, Thanks for all your tips and answers / opinions .... ;-)

Greeting MiniBob

Space


Antwort von Freddi:

Your requirements s.The Cam You can with the Sonysicher s.besten satisfy.
When the CX550 is outside the budget, then take the CX505 (above 520).
They have, however, unlike the 550s is no microphone input, less WW and no SD Card (MS).
Sony Pro:
- Best stability among the consumers of
- Best lowlight
- Night shot
Contra Sony:
- Expensive Memory Sticks
- Expensive Batteries
Panasonic Speakers m. E. Only the manual a bit better opportunities.

Space


Antwort von deti:

"Freddie" wrote: Contra Sony:
- Expensive Memory Sticks

Sonyist just bury in with his own memory sticks. The next generation of camcorders will work with SD cards, as is already in all new digital cameras at Sonyder case.

Deti

Space


Antwort von Freddi:

The current CX550 has both - SD Card and Memory Stick!
Where did you get the info with the "bury"?
If this is so, then yes (hopefully) set up shortly before a fall in prices and I can stock up Once again ...

Space


Antwort von MiniBob:

Thank you for your tips / thoughts ... :-)

I tend more synonymous to the Sony, mainly because of the probably the best image stabilization in this camcorder range.

But in the CX505/520 already entscheident bothers me that they do not have the new WW!

And is the Image Stabilization of the equipment Sony2010 not slightly better than of the 2009 models?

Fundamental issue that burns me still under the nails:
What is the Image Stabilization of 2010s PANASONIC SONY Image Stabilization in Comparison to 2010/2009? Is there actually real and effective (yet) much difference?

How's that with the AF: Is that when Sonynicht slightly worse (slow) than in Pana?

What is with Sonyversus Nightshot Video Light for Pana (Tm60) for filem at dusk / dark (near field)?

And speaks in my case for something ne 3chip Cam ==> Panasonic SD707? (Stabil.? LowLight? Fct?)

I admit it's a price incentive for the Pana TM60, which after all is really quite favorably with many positive features and functions .... * grübel *...

Or bene but the CX305 and waive Nightshot .... (but definitely would be a constraint for me, without disturbing one way in darkness (with no light) film them ...)

Thanks again for all the other influences and ideas and tips and opinions, etc .... :-)

Greeting MiniBob

Space


Antwort von Freddi:

The auto focus of the CX 505 is significantly better than that of HC 9 (I'm both!).
On the subject of filming in the dark: the Sonyhat a night shot mode - ie the cam works with a built-in IR light and the images are so "green". The "Low Light Mode" of the Panasonic, although in Color (synonymous with additional lighting, however) in my eyes completely unusable Sobal the subject is synonymous only a few moves.

If you can give up the microphone input and an SD card, take the CX 505 and a decent WW - which would be cheaper, the bottom line as a CX 550th
The image stabilizer is to better than Panasonic and classes of the 3-chip technology you see nothing (this was a TM 300 vs. Comparison. CX 505).

And when you Sonyhast also run through the AV remote the possibility of a wired remote control (eg s.Tripod or sports packages) to.

But if you value it on as well. Lay control, you're better off with Panasonic - but is it in these cyanobacteria always a miserable fumble.

EDIT:
Especially in this "wartifan" wrote: Whoops. No filter thread, no remote control, no accessory shoe.
Nee, das geht gar nicht!

For me, THE KO criterion.


Space


Antwort von MiniBob:

@ Freddie:

Thanks, that was once quite clear.

You mean / so recommend to one CX505 + WW essay? (Which one? By Sonyorig. How much is above sowas s.Lens forward? Did you measure screwed for something (is not it? Price) Ca.-?)

And the image stabilizer is on Sonyambsten, and btw CX505 (2009) and CX305 (2010) has not been synonymous mekrlich improved, right?

Thanks ertsmal, I guess after a while .... ;-)

Gruss, MiniBob

Space


Antwort von Freddi:

Image stabilization is the same.
The CX 550 is synonymous to the same chip as the CX 505 (520) - The chip's CX 305, however, is somewhat smaller.

Most of the WW Raynox use here - I personally did to me 2 years ago for my HC 9 is a Set of Hama (1.5 tele, he, he + 0.65 WW) purchased - sufficient for my needs.
A wide-angle ancillary "extended" the cam in front by about 2 to 3 cm, depending on Manufacturer.
If I still dranhabe the 100s Battery, which is almost twice as long as Cam, without accessories ;-) ...
Sony PS The cable remote control, I have synonymous - is great. Soon there is the Bluetooth Micro and then I'm finished.

Space


Antwort von MiniBob:

@ Freddie:
Ok, thanks for the additional information.

(Well, 2-3cm in front again on it, and then it will already critical because of "Handycam" light and small for plugging go anywhere ...).

I then search times for such a purpose WW Internet - sometimes look what it will cost ...

Greeting Minibob

Space



Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash