Frage von rosenbaum:
Hi,
I use as a hobby photographer Photo Giotto and Manfrotto tripods.
Since I am now a Video Camera (irgenwas reluctant to camcorder in me to write), have increased, I would like to know what the difference between Still Image and video tripod exists.
I'm not around the head, that is clear, but why have video tripods s.den bracing legs again, although this stands in the photo because of better adjustment are not desired.
Can I use my photo tripod with a video head and how to use about 100, - euro would be recommended.
Thank you very much
Gruss Jürgen
Antwort von egal - kein bock:
Almost all the video heads so you can only - or so | move. That is, in practice, the most serious difference.
The bracing does not interfere with the building, stands a good one only needs to solve the lock and the Tripod s.Kopf then pull upwards.
Serve the aspirations of the one of stability (more weight) and the other is to increase the torsional.
I would now write as spontaneously ...
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
Video cameras of the higher price classes are significantly heavier than DSLR (except of course with the right fat lenses). The stability is synonymous much more important than a photo tripod, because like for a rich 500stel seconds, which is already on film and from violent to provide.
Video tripods are synonymous not only by wind or Tatterhände shaken. With the video camera is synonymous direction, as is the construction (by the fluid resistance in the head) to synonymous twisting load. Without bracing would pervert the Tripod and after the swing (in the picture then visible) back again.
If you only spend like 100 euros, look after the Velbon DV 7000th There is a very nice adjustable fluid head like it.
BG
Andreas
Antwort von rosenbaum:
Hi,
thank you for your explanation,
werd mich dann mal after Velbon umschaun.
Gruss Jürgen
