Frage von horton:
Hi All,
I now own a Canon MVX100i and wondering now switch to the Canon MVX3i.
Reason would be for me, especially the optical stabilizer. In summer it is that is once again on canoe trip to Alaska, and since one must often schonmal filmed from inside the boat out, if any non s.Ufer bear, moose and co. And as an optical stabilizer is already gold. When did he hät what it promises.
The electronic stabilizer s.der MVX100i has not convinced me. Is the optical stabilizer with the video cameras similar to those of the camera lenses of Canon?
Furthermore, the image quality is obviously very important.
Is the image quality of MVX3i actually much better compared to the MVX100i? Or he is so small that it will in this respect should rather take the XM2.
greetings
Joachim
Antwort von coconut:
When all I can tell of a Canon Hi8 and because the stability was top-notch. No Comparison to an electronic. Those I've met bissher give stuttering during the shoot, that was definitely not the case with the Canon ...
As I had previously Comparison: JVC SXM260 (S-VHS-C), Panasonic RX? and a Panasonic NV-GS17 ....
Antwort von bjoerni:
Hi horton,
So I have the MVX3i, but without knowing the MVX100i too. I previously had a "low-Panasonic 'model and find that the MVX3i some advantages over my old camera has.
The image quality has improved notably (colors, sharpness and exposure). Also prima I find the focus ring and the zebra-pattern function of overexposure. However, the Cam is synonymous its "dark side" - and in the truest sense of the word. With low-light shots are quite dark (and noisy, if you lighten the pictures after the event). In addition, the autofocus and the White Balance then no longer works correctly (okay, yes, the manual controls are in favor of there - I have unfortunately to rely on the rule, electronics ..). Specifically, I have a little Christmas Eve with poor lighting and this red light pretty much filmed. This led to unmotivated focus changes, and also the images of a hideous marked in red.
Keywords Image Stabilization: is certainly one of the better, but last year in Sweden I have filmed synonymous from the canoe. And the fluctuations synonymous with the good you can hardly compensate for image stabilization. And certainly not when you see a bear anywhere s.Ufer and beautiful ranzoomst ........ Well, just raises the question of the alternative, that is how you get such shots in principle wobble in the box.
So in a nutshell: image quality and handling very well, but only in good light. Image Stabilization good, but obviously can not perform miracles ..
Antwort von Jan:
Hello you,
The MVX 3i is already a trace better MVX 100i MVX 3i vs zebra überbelichtungsanzeige + the beautiful ring was called AF, manual level control, custom programming buttons, the larger 3.5 "LCD, 16 / 9 high resolution, the RGB filter - the the colors can not look so washed out,
the larger CCD 1 / 3, 4 "to 1 / 4", the higher picture resolution, which described very good optical stabilizer of Canon.
Batteries are both the same, since there is no stress, therefore, BP 514 / 522 / 535 and the intelligent accessory shoe for flash lights and they've got both.
Filter size is 46 instead of 37 mm, unfortunately (MVX 100i)
If the money is there, then purchase MVX 3i .....
LG
January
Antwort von horton:
Hi All,
erstmal thank you for your detailed responses. ja erstmal that sounds good. Now I am sorry to say that it is to get the MVX3i only in an Internet shop. And who has not synonymous bad reviews. You will probably seem to be a discontinued model.
Then perhaps only remains to look XM2 übrig.Mal if I get it used somewhere.
greetings
horton
Antwort von danissl:
hab ich mal ne ask because I see that you just discussed about the Canon MVX 3i Of ... does anybody know whether the DM-MVX 3i a different camera than the MVX 3i? are there differences?
Many greetings Daniel *
Antwort von Markus:
does anybody know whether the DM-MVX 3i a different camera than the MVX 3i? Hi Daniel,
The model names are abbreviated for simplicity happy. So you find here in the forum for example, a number of contributions to the Canon XL2, but few to the Canon DM-XM2 camcorder (same, but) a full model name.
Similar question:
Antwort von beiti:
I own the MVX3i a bit longer. There is still a great cam with excellent price-performance ratio - if you know the specific weaknesses and can deal with. It is definitely not a beginner-Cam, as they sometimes bad results in automatic production.
My detailed report still stands as the customer reviews on Amazon, where the synonymous MVX3i there is no longer available. Maybe you'll get a good used copy.
Antwort von danissl:
Thank you for your quick help! I was not sure if that is the same, the cams are ... Now I just need to look somewhere even if I still a herbekomme ... 're now sadly become quite rare ... maybe I'm so lucky! I can tell you, yes, if I find a ...
Many greetings Daniel *
Antwort von prem:
Hello,
The Canon can MVX3i out and again as "Canon outlet" (so typing in ebay) will be auctioned on ebay. 2 weeks ago a corresponding Cam for EUR 450, - new with warranty (1 year) on the virtual counter is gone. Also I bought my cam there, and the settlement worked well.
The image quality of MVX3i to the MVX100i is in good light is not much better. The sound, however, is all the better classes and the manual controls almost rich s.The up of professional equipment.
Greeting
Roland
Antwort von Harser:
Is the general Lichtempfindilchkeit the MVX3i in low-light situations well?
She has a large CCD (1/3.4) above average aperture f/1.6, because it would have a lot of light arriving on the chip. Sets the chip, the signal is good at?
I do not mean the gain. The software-amplification and image enhancement can indeed perform much better after the cut. When the camera since before real-time enhanced the effect is even more of bildverschlechternd.
How, for example, cuts MVX40 from the Comparison?
Antwort von Jan:
Hello you,
Canon cameras have been quite a long time the signal processor DIG! C DV, which has built-H HDV XL 1, even the new DiG! C II.
As far as I know, the MVX 100 i / 150 i / MV 6xx and older not yet installed DIG! C DV, then there must be a "predecessor" have.
What can a new main processor has been in the area digicam Canon EOS 300 D vs. 350 D views, the speed / data processing / image noise benefits were convincingly even though the sensor of the 300 D is slightly larger and it 1.7 million pixels
had less - the light-sensitive pixels are bigger in the old 300 D and although she had no chance there are more synonymous with strengthening / ISO against the newer 350 D to.
On newer CCD sensors, the incident light is collected more effectively, Signalrausabstände be improved.
Yes actually the MVX 3i / MVX 40 should have a level playing field (very similar resolution, the same processor / CCD (Size). In recent years, has probably done a lot in the CCD technology, though both use similar anti-noise filter, I do not know. You You are right, but some anti-noise filter "filters" fine structures away erstmal, each surface / Fonts then act the same - an extreme upfront Blur - Image errors.
In retrospect one can with difficulty and can better decide how much should be the degree of filtering.
VideoaktivDigital gave the newer MVX 40 / MVX 45i a Good in low light, as far as I know, the MVX 3i was a little worse in the same area, it must have, therefore, still within what they did.
LG
January
Antwort von Harser:
Thanks Jan, that has already helped me very much.
Antwort von beiti:
Is the general Lichtempfindilchkeit the MVX3i in low-light situations well? They would certainly not be my first choice as a lowlight cam. In the P-automatics, they will automatically switch to jerky 1 / 25 second exposure time, but what can you bypass the TV mode. If we then filmed in normally-lit living room with 1 / 50 seconds, the picture is very dark, as there would be no gain. Subsequent Input Levels makes the picture brighter and more useful, but then rushes over and, of course, has very little color saturation. Whether the MVX3i out of any strengthened, I do not know. A manual setting / control for this is lacking.
VideoAktivDigital the MVX3i there (as far as I remember) for LowLight a "poor" because of the 1 / 25 seconds of the dark, and overall impression. The test in automatic and does not take into account what may be rausholen with some post-processing.
EDIT: I had created some time ago ever seen a brightness comparison:
http://beitinger.org/helligkeitstest/helligkeitstest.html
Using the Interior at 1 / 50 seconds you can taste a little of what goes through post yet.
