Frage von Columbus1492:
I have some time since the comparisons. Do me between Canon (HF 10 / HF 11) and SD 300 Panasonic HDC decide.
A question to the test: Are the test results of 2008 tests
directly with the principle 2009er tests comparable? Does a "Good" 10 in the RF field as Lowlight really
directly improve the test results as "Satisfactory" in the SD 300 or are already 2009er test higher (possibly synonymous subjective) standards applied?
Over a short answer I would be very grateful.
Antwort von rudi:
The results will of course directly comparable. It is, however, that the HF10/11 just looks good and was thus not too far of the SD300 away. Especially in low-light focus is HF10/11 a bit better. In return, the Pana a bit more color. When noise and noise are both quite modest.
Rudi
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
Where the issue is the test, as it would in the future to me a brief remark about the Bokeh? Many have a diamond-shaped effective Bokeh, which I feel very ugly. Have the times been synonymous somewhere here in the forums of others is that it disturbs. So it could be a test point to be mentioned. Wär nett ...
... in any case, I would hereby synonymous times praise for comparisons pronounce! It seems synonymous newcomers a great help too, since the requests for consultations significantly decreased.
