Logo Logo
/// 
Gespräch - Welches Mikrofon?

Talk - Which Microphone?



Frage von Berliner84:
Februar 2011

I want indoor communication situations (2-3 people) to record in the best possible audio quality.

What kind of microphone is s.besten in it?

More of a directional microphone (eg http://www.thomann.de/de/rode_ntg_2.htm)
or a tie clip microphone (eg http://www.thomann.de/de/akg_ck55l.htm)
or maybe a classic reporter microphone (eg http://www.thomann.de/de/akg_d_230.htm)
?



Antwort von carstenkurz:

In 2-3 people indoors can be thought of much.

For what I imagine less, none of the above types would be useful. Unless, perhaps, you could always attach any person's Lavaliermikro. With pure table discussions in small groups PZMs (Boundary Microphones) very useful.


- Carsten



Antwort von nicecam:

I, as a non-audio expert, would now spontaneously to the dynamic micro discouraged. Regardless of the brand of you mentioned.

Of the lavalier then yes you need more. When you described of recording situation occurs frequently, that may well have to address.

For occasional use to "medium frequent" case, I think you're better with the dynamic.

However, due to the then rather that you are not a lone soldier on the road, but at least as 2Mann/Frau-Team.

Would the whole thing yet (as I said, I am a layman audio) can be read to you!





Antwort von Berliner84:

So the situation will be such that 2-3 people s.einem table / bed sit and talk together.

I favor right now Lapel for all persons involved s.Gespräch.
Can I merge the signals and for then send an audio input (jack) s.die Camera?



Antwort von domain:

Between two and three people but there is a huge difference. With two people working synonymous nor a lapel, the side of the sleeve of one infected person in the direction of another person located directly next to it very well, tested it yesterday.
With three people, I see no light with this line. This could be considerably more complicated.



Antwort von nicecam:

In the case then I would rather advise Lavaliers synonymous. Otherwise, there'd have always let the reporter go micro in turn.

As the signals are coming into the camera. First, we need to know what camera you have. But equal to 2 / 3 signals at once?
Because you need any thing in between. :-) An audio interface.

The signals can, of course, on an external recorder recorded separately and later with the picture are synchronized.



Antwort von nicecam:

Gottogott, we parley in real time. S.Samstagabend sit there in front of the PC, our drinking red wine against my 1000 post and make small talk :-)



Antwort von carstenkurz:

So the classic talk show on television with more than one person is handled with Ansteckmikros. They that have no problem with the cost of each person and can be a synonymous radio stations, but under somewhat more controlled conditions is the synonymous wired.

Direct connection of multiple microphones, however, is tinkering - a simple Behringer mixer with microphone inputs is even more necessary. There is still a very cheap solution with good speech intelligibility and, apart from the wire, very discreet packaging and 'null' handling costs. Reporter's microphone with rumreichen imaging've no more.

If cheapest cost for a complete radio link with Sun Microsystems ¬ 130-150. That is nothing great quality, but usable for Language and doing without interference. Mixers you need but as yet synonymous. But has the advantage that the beneficiaries of synonymous same line level and you come out with a really manages VERY simple mixer.

Pure cable solution starts p.20-30 ¬ per channel. Since the mixer needs but according to many mic inputs. Is it going on p.60-70 ¬.

There are synonymous such super cheap things especially for many microphones:

http://www.rcsystems.de/shop/produkt/4158/288/mikrofon-mischpult-fuer-8-mikrosro/

But I dare not say with respect to noise or annoying noise in such a cheap commodity. Dear little more to spend on the smallest possible Behringer, T-MIX, Phonic, etc.

The pros shake, of course, with something still, but for the specified purpose are okay.

Of course, an additional mixer a bit more setup and adjustment work and understanding of a mixer. But the simple 1:1 amalgamation of several microphones is nunmal not synonymous simply, each speaker must be approximated by the mixture to a stereo channel has to adapt to ideally have the channels, at least in principle, easy frequency terms on the mixer EQ, etc. The mixer but has also ne useful meter, master control, headphone output for default, etc. pp.


Which Camera is used for?

- Carsten




Antworten zu ähnlichen Fragen:
Bluetooth Microphone Sony ECM AW3 rauscht
Filmemacher Talk
Ursa Mini 4.6 Talk
Kurznews: Apertus Axiom Team Talk
Der neunte apertus AXIOM Team Talk...
Axiom Team Talk 6 - wieder alles etwas anders
Small-Talk: Wollen die Japaner VDSLR/EVIL-Markt nicht so ernst aufbauen?

















weitere Themen:
Spezialthemen


16:9
ARD
AVCHD
AVI
Adobe After Effects
Adobe Premiere Pro
After effects
Apple Final Cut Pro
Audio
Avid
Cam
Camcorder
Camera
Canon
Capture
Capturing
Clip
EOS
Editing
Effect
Error
Export
File
Files
Film
Final Cut
Format
Formate
HDR
Import
JVC
Layer
Light
MAGIX video deLuxe
Magix
Microphone
Monitor
Movie
PC
Panasonic
Pinnacle
Pinnacle Studio
Player
Premiere
RAM
RED
Recording
Red
Software
Sony
Sound
Studio
TV
Tape
Video
Videos



update am 14.September 2019 - 18:02
slashCAM
ist ein Projekt der channelunit GmbH
*Datenschutzhinweis*