Frage von aight8:
I turn out side so many times. Actually, almost always. But I am concerned more with the question (among others mentioned last because my colleague: Yes here you can not shoot anyway) exactly what you would shoot and what not?
I'm going to shoot s.and in the city. Who am I what movies, dan You can see that now all the stores, etc. strictly as McDonald or in the station. This is the first question. Where is the the line?
(1) Who is ausserhald of shops or public buildings is that you can not shoot in that direction?
(2) So we can in the city, neither s.Bahnhöfen to film in places. Speak only on the road.
(3) May I shoot people directly in the face, and dan publish? (Bit of a blatant example:) But you can not ask anybody whether he will appear in the video)
So summarized: Where can I film, IF I can shoot HOW?
Naia, can someone please tell me because generally clear up the issue?
Antwort von Daniel007:
If I have to surf around here so late, I can recommend this thread once that was a few days ago of a curious user declines to life. : D
http://forum.slashcam.de/drehgenehmigungen-vt3823.html
Maybe even crass mike here synonymous still help.
Good night then! ;-)
Antwort von aight8:
Yes ok once did this in 2001 revived Thread views: D interesting ... but wait just a useful post .. ;)
Ville Maybe someone can still go to my questions a bit more specific:)
Antwort von soan:
- You may shoot in all directions, provided there are public places and public buildings.
- How you answer your question with your question 2 1, and the synonymous nor false? One can shoot in the city. A train station is not a city, but the web site. And who would like to issue a filming permit before shooting. Just a brewery - private property. Or a hair salon - private sector.
- If people traipse over s.dir and you film it in a way, give their consent (implied) - because they realize that yes you film and take it through for anszusprechen without you. If they speak to you the desire to be respected.
However, the shooting of people is generally difficult. A crowd s.einem s.Marktplatz well in a long shot - ok. A man s.Tisch an ice cream parlors with big face - not ok.
A group of adolescents in a long shot thrashing in the market place - ok or not? No idea in doubt, always secure and questions. We Fernsehfuzzis do something so permanent, but since I'm always in the back of an editor in doubt, get the hassle (or the help of the television law expert) :-)
Antwort von Pianist:
I'm going to shoot s.and in the city. Who am I what movies, dan You can see that now all the stores, etc. strictly as McDonald or in the station. This is the first question. Where is the the line? The boundary is the boundary. The sometimes be obvious, for instance, when as a fence, and if not, then someone who wants to make the claims, evidence in an appropriate manner, where the property line is.
(1) Who is ausserhald of shops or public buildings is that you can not shoot in that direction? But, of course you may. You stand still on public streets and you can therefore rely on the freedom of panorama. Exceptions are made in Germany really only a handful of military facilities, and there are very clear signs. Even works of art that are not allowed to permanently public place, take you, but do not publish it (example: "Wrapped Reichstag").
(2) So we can in the city, neither s.Bahnhöfen to film in places. Speak only on the road. "At stations" You can not shoot, of course, if you're on the public road. You can shoot a railfan way synonymous within the normal passenger areas that is permitted. Only commercial or journalistic shots require a permit. And if you're with a private group in a bar, then you should of course there filming for fun s.der joy, so long as None, however, has.
(3) May I shoot people directly in the face, and dan publish? (Bit of a blatant example:) But you can not ask anybody whether he will appear in the video) Well, if there are clearly identifiable individuals, which are the main subject and are not considered accessory, then you need to have to ask if you want to publish. If there are many people, however, and these people are just accessories, you have to ask them. That is always an individual decision.
Matthias
Antwort von newsart:
Good adventure! Basically you have to distinguish first of all:
A: Where / what can you shoot?
B: What you may not use it?
First A: In public places you can actually completely uninhibited film free approach. The basic rule is: All you can see from the normal perspective of a passer allowed to, you shoot synonymous. The façade of the McDonald branch that is synonymous. But if you with a Telebjektiv reinzoomst through the window into the store and very tight film, as the cashier issues a receipt, so that the limit of "normal" viewing angle is exceeded. . On private land and soil (this is synonymous around the station as the property of Deutsche Bahn, or a department store, you will need for the Rotate permission from the owner / user as it looks now with people from: Everyone has a right s.eigenen Picture. Therefore, the Nahaufnehme one person is always subject to approval. From 5 people on the Picture, however, speak of a "group" which may be filmed without permission in public places ... unless ...
And now we come to B: ... unless ... You are the recordings private or registered (for journalists reporting) using. Sell When used for advertising or selling through agencies that s.Werbekunden synonymous, much more stringent standards are applied. Here you need for any identifiable person shown a consent form and can cause problems with trademark rights (recognizable car brands synonymous or the McDonald logo) get.
In practice, usually helps the non-legal question: Who could the reason have any objection to the recording. Then, when the alarm bells ringing, you should take a legal mind or this review. If a no doubters think, is behind most synonymous None to complain.
By the way, there are quite synonymous many arguments that a law passed when shooting safety. So I would need while in a street survey of each witness the consent form. But who readily speaks into a microphone, a cameraman with a visible camera faces and smiles into the Lens, who made it difficult to raise objection against the use afterwards. Of course, it is forbidden to film with the camera phone of the unsuspecting passer-by under the skirt. But if the Super Star at the press presentation of the new album with a belly button detail, he can not complain if it is synonymous zooming deep into the cut.
So, think and act according to common sense is usually better than carrying around the rights of the press under his arm. And depending on the situation, anyone who asks nicely, gets a permit usually synonymous. Or: Who cares long, you get stupid answers. There's only instinct and a little experience.
