Frage von Nautilus:
Moin evening shift!
Many, many read and researched articles later, I have now wrestled to your nerves once again with breaking such a thread.
Since September last year, so I'll buy pretty much any video magazine and at least twice s.Tag, Google is looking for me for "camcorder review.
Now I am sorry and I turn ichs s.euch. Without further BlaBla here are my requirements:
I'm looking for a camcorder inder price range up to 3200 ¬! I still am a student, but I want to do for my portfolio, now have good work ...
What search / I need?
If I knew ... I want to cover everything. From the music video, on documentaries, short art films and everything should be there.
Now I weigh before and disadvantages.
The camera should primarily be that deliver synonymous otherwise, a very good picture quality, LEAST good enough to expose on film.
Of course, my playful child's head fell on the FX1.
However, loud voices cry: No, today's HDV cams do not have too many teething problems, the FX1 has poor low-light capabilities, Reiss pans are blurred, the MPEG codec delivers artifacts blah blah blah ....
Good, let's look at DV to.
The Panasonic and JVC cams synonymous in this area look interesting. Above all, the Panasonic AG-DVX 100 BE. What I miss is s.ihr However, for each feature a single wheel or lever ones. The Fx1 eg provides for zoom and focus each a ring. Nagut when the rocker is big enough and nice to be synonymous OK ....
Of course, I would stop ALL s.liebsten Manual. But the dream is at about 5400 ¬ and called JVC GY-HD 100th. unfortunately too expensive ....
Man, what I really want ... I ask you this ... Other PROS screaming: NO XLR you're lost ...... To be honest I'd synonymous with an entirely separate sound à la the first FLAP no problem. That would only confirm me in my professional if you understand ... ;)
The cam should be reasonably difficult (otherwise I'll do it seriously)
Ach du Schreck. Now I chatterbox you and me an impossible problem ...
I already have with the Fx1 and Canon XL1s worked, but at a conclusion, I am not now come ...
By the way: Anyone who reads this sentence has been my problem entirely accepted. Thank you * smack *
AND NOW THE QUESTION FIIIIIIIIINALE:
WHAT IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR ME???
FX1 ,.... hdv, dv, canon, jvc .... (I werfg times everything in the raumw s.mir just think .......)
The synonymous with good productions of good editing, sound, lighting, etc. belongs to me is well aware of ... exactly not only about the picture.
THANK YOU!
Antwort von MiXMaster:
Ask your Dad to 3000th - Euro and buy the FX1. Has good all-round synonymous (no noise at night shots) and already looks halfway professional manner to the impression of flay.
LG Helmut
Antwort von Nautilus:
My dad would be if it comes to the question of capital, I still own ...
And if the picture quality of the flaying Fx1 impression, then let me know!
Antwort von PowerMac:
I'm only 21 synonymous and have a DVX. I am working synonymous (too) much with the FX1 and a DSR 390th What I read between the lines out, speaks for the DVX. You want to make artistic things synonymous, documentaries, features, etc. Since the look is very important. The DVX is a good look. If you move the camera (+ staging + lighting + Production Design) did well on it to see how many images from 16mm.
XLR, a manual zoom, focus ring ansprechnenden a fast, full frames, and a cool look. For me, much better than the FX1. General of the handling and so it is good. They tried synonymous not be a pseudo-shoulder camera like the XL1. Quite small, good battery, many controls ...
Antwort von Nautilus:
When Zoom is but an electronic ring, not mechanically, right?
He cycles through the zoom range slowly enough? Hach, I have to test it ...
Antwort von PowerMac:
Manual zoom is mechanically coupled! Reißzooms, you can quickly zoom in manual, sharp and so are!
The focus is servogestützt. Frankly, I feel equal to him, then become a real focus of a large camera. NEVER had that problem.
Antwort von Nautilus:
Did I just read synonymous. Which version do you work? With the BE or AE? I have read that is necessary for a perfect 16:9 mode, a special paper that makes the entire CCD chip surface available. So I want to work mainly in 16:9 format.
Antwort von PowerMac:
The DVX100AE.
Look at dvxuser.com in the forum clean. Then you have something to read eight months
Antwort von Nautilus:
I really like the DVX100AE very good ... the problem is unfortunately a passable 16:9 mode ...
or what is tolerable? 16:9 mode works reasonably well but without converter lens?
Antwort von PowerMac:
I do not have this lens. Got the squeeze mode synonymous never used solo. In dvxuser.com but some use the synonymous without Lens. 4:3 compared with apparently somewhat better results.
If you does not reach 4:3, you need to buy this lens (700-1000 euro).
Makes the whole, however unprofitable. -> Close to the HVX200 (6000 euro +)
The JVC GY-HD101 would be something for you. You say yourself, but too expensive.
Too much time?
Read the article on the homepage, some cameras have been tested very well (registration required):
http://dv.com/
Then) (after an hour you're almost smarter. Synonymous, I found some new things out about these cameras.
Patrick
Antwort von Jan:
Hello you,
naja with the zoom at the DVX 100 is probably a matter of opinion.
I had already written the views of the entire zoom range even at a rotation of the zoom ring is passed through 90 °. Smooth zooms are not so easy to realize. The small zoom lever can unscrew however, and replace it with larger ones. If one relies on the zoom button, "storm" ahead of synonymous mighty fast. About the color viewfinder with 180,000 pixels with manual focussing you can argue are synonymous. This does not apply to the new BE - no idea whether improvements were made in the direction
In it are synonymous professional IT CCD's installed and) the Wide Anglevon 50 ° - 32.5 mm (Small is awesome.
But in the whole test a Top Camera - Testing
The Optex 16 / 9 anamorphic with 58 mm thread would be a Kanidat (Professional Outfitters eucam - from Wiesbaden has driven him time zb)
Or Century widescreen adapter.
Unfortunately, not durchzoomen both Aperture and cost a sensitivity to light, but the depth is reduced to two.
LG
January
Antwort von Markus:
Hello "Nautilus"
Patrick (PowerMac) swears by his DVX100, which can be mistaken s.der lot of positive comments almost exclusively. ;-)
I will send once "my" Camera with the race:
SonyDCR-VX2000 with WW-Converter or Panasonic AG-DVX100? (And there link to a detailed comparison vs. DVX100. PD170).
Happy reading! ;-)
