Frage von Jitter:
The Stiftung Warentest has now ruled synonymous, who should be the best camcorder. The surprise winner is Canon HF S21, the offense not only in the final grade, the Panasonic HS 700, but it clearly synonymous with image depends Note (1.6 to 2.1). Mainly because of the Canon in artificial light and in image stabilization is the only camcorder at all evaluated with very well.
Particularly convincing appears the test, however. The 50p function is not mentioned at all. In measuring the Focal and the zoom factor you have apparently swapped numbers. Then the Panasonic s.wenigsten Wide Anglevon has to offer everyone. Even the sound, there are inconsistencies, the possibility for manual level control is completely ignored.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
I have long been no "camera test" Stiftung Warentest longer read, but appears to have gained the testers now not much s.Kompetenz ;-) I remember s.so some "tests" decades ago, who see it only as involuntary laughing could. Often voted not even the technical data that could have been from any prospectus can write off. Sadly, only if someone believes what Stiftung Warentest writes about cameras, and take the results as a basis for his decision to buy.
Antwort von HansMaulwurf:
One wonders, is whether this is an isolated case or if you would be familiar in all test areas, all the tests turned out as nonsense ...
Antwort von DWUA:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRN9weT2WgY
www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dJKUwHFOYA
Sorry Bernard, but under these conditions we have synonymous
the job change.
Well, the name
"Bernard" rhymes with none other items:
"Learned again what" ...
;)))
