I have numerous mini S-VHS tapes which I on my laptop (Amilo Xi 25 28) would like to edit. To transfer from analogue camcorders (Panasonic) I use Videograbber (MSI Movie Vox V2.0). The camcorder has as output an alternative S-VHS and RCA (red, white, yellow). The Videograbber has alternatively as input S-VHS and RCA (red, white, yellow) with the laptop is connected via USB. The problem is that I at S-VHS on the laptop does not get Picture. For composite connection I get is an Picture but only with the bad Resolution640 x 480 According to s.Videograbber I would reach 720 x 576. For video editing I use MAGIX Video de Luxe the 2007th The Videograbber has a red pressure switch (capture button?). What could he serve? For switch control, there is no change. Neither the dealer nor devices could guide me about the function of the switch enlighten. About helping answer I would be delighted. Many greetings Plant
Antwort von thos-berlin:
According to features overview at MSI, it is true that Grabber 720x576 video format. Unfortunately you can not download Manual. Have you had none of it?
mE: should be somewhere in the software adjustable
- In what is Resolutioneingelesen - What video input (Y / C - S-video or CVBS - yellow RCA) is used. (Sound is the same for both)
The manual is synonymous sure the function of the button below.
Antwort von werk:
unfortunately it had no manual and the included CD offers just a simple video editing program but no hardware instructions
Antwort von Markus:
A good product has a good manual synonymous, no preference whether in print version or in the form of a PDF file. Also includes USB Videograbber for 20 ¬ is not the equipment, with which video recordings of good quality can digitizer.
In this context, you might be interested in possibility of a complaint:
Then it is clear to me holding the new question: what do I have quality features at a Vidiograbber eight and what better way there is my analog VHS S mini cassette camcorder from the laptop to transfer? Greeting plant
Antwort von thos-berlin:
So now try first whether the above-mentioned manual helpful. And whether you like the Quallität enough.
If not, the big brothers of the grabbers are the AD-converter (eg Canopus of video or data). The make, in principle the same as a grabber, you can usually synonymous, however, the "back" (ie off analogue), are sent via Firewire s.den PC and deliver high quality results.
They do they behave like a camera connected via Firewire, so with any editing program and without any other drivers and a single-reading is possible. The format of the data stream is DV-AVI, which further editing (cutting) s.PC without the "dislocations" possible. The conversion of the final product into a DVD but can be even much longer.
Antwort von Meggs:
"factory" wrote:
What better way is my analog mini S VHS cassette from your camcorder to the laptop to transfer?
Many digital camcorders have analog inputs. A few years ago was still the standard. My Canon MV600i, 2004 was entry-level camcorder. It has analog CVBS and S-Video inputs and can signal via FireWire directly to the PC through in fairly good quality. Maybe you're so synonymous have such a device, or you know someone who is not the product you borrow now.
Antwort von Markus:
"factory" wrote:
What better way is my analog mini S VHS cassette from your camcorder to the laptop to transfer?
Here was the most common ways times collected: Six ways to Video8/Hi8 to digitizer (up to point 3 synonymous to other video systems applicable).
"thos-berlin" wrote:
The big brothers of the grabber, the AD converter (eg Canopus of video or data). The make, in principle the same as a grabber ...
This could almost be concluded that cheap Videograbber the same digital quality (can) as right A / D converter. This is not the case, as I said in this paper have summarized times: digitizing of Sony CCD-TR840E.
Antwort von thos-berlin:
Quote:
The big brothers of the grabber, the AD converter (eg Canopus of video or data). The make, in principle the same as a grabber ...
Quote:
This could almost be concluded that cheap Videograbber the same digital quality (can) as right A / D converter.
I think already that grabber and the AD converter in principle (!) The same thing, namely, analog video signals into data digalte convert. The rest of the record of Mark is cited
Quote:
and deliver high quality results.
and should actually make it clear that I mean "bersser grabber than a" mean. Otherwise I would have the AD converter is hardly mentioned.
Synonymous, I would seriously assert that a Phaeton brother of one of the great golf is. Both are cars (even a brand) with which you can drive but they both provide different Fahrquallität.
(On the Vergreich Trabbi / Mercedes, I have about my concept of "big brother" deliberately omitted, but the difference would certainly make clear)
But maybe I just do not say clearly enough that not only AD-converters are better than grabber, grabbers but also synonymous nor worse than the AD converter ....
Antwort von Meggs:
"thos-berlin" wrote:
that not only AD-converters are better than Grabber
The distinction between AD converters and Grabber s.sich is wrong. Both are AD converters. The are more expensive than the cheap - as with other devices synonymous.
Antwort von thos-berlin:
Thanks for the kind note. The difference to me is well aware.
The language used here in the forum but tends to be known as the "AD-converter" for the higher quality AD converters, while not as high quallitativ approve AD-hiking here as a "grabber" respectively.
I ask my incorrect verbal apology and hope that the questioner my speech could still follow. Otherwise, yes, he has the correct position by Megger.
Antwort von Meggs:
"thos-berlin" wrote:
The language used here in the forum but tends to be known as the "AD Converter" hochwerigigeren for the AD converter, while the quallitativ not so cheap hochwerugen AD hiking here as a "grabber" respectively.
For those who do not follow his speech were: with "hochwerigigeren" or "hochwerugen" says thos-berlin "high quality".
Antwort von Markus:
"thos-berlin" wrote:
The language used here in the forum but tends to be known as the "AD-converter" for the higher quality AD converters, while not as high quallitativ approve AD-hiking here as a "grabber" respectively.
This I see as synonymous. One need only look at the manufacturers of the names of those selected devices ensured.
Antwort von babalu:
"Mark" wrote:
"thos-berlin" wrote:
The language used here in the forum but tends to be known as the "AD-converter" for the higher quality AD converters, while not as high quallitativ approve AD-hiking here as a "grabber" respectively.
This I see as synonymous. One need only look at the manufacturers of the names of those selected devices ensured.
The more and the larger "professional" thing is, the more shitty quality.
Antwort von Markus:
"One guest wrote:
The more and the larger "professional" thing is, the more shitty quality.
