Newsmeldung von slashCAM:Turns 30 FpS implied standard? Of rudi - 9 oct 2006 13:40:00 > With the high-definition television expands the format from jungle. But not only the resolutions may differ greatly, synonymous, the frame rates are likely to make in the future for confusion.
full article
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
Strictly speaking, there are still 29.97 fps, right? In any case, one more reason to watch the whole are a few (quiet synonymous for a few more) years, instead of buying stupid as all that sparkles and shines.
Antwort von prem:
No, I think HDV was dropped frame code with 29.97 FPS no longer included. There are a full 30 frames per second (or am I wrong?).
Antwort von hannes:
And what remains of the PAL-vector to?
Do we want really to NTSC Driss?
Antwort von Cocoa.de:
Then please just FpS 24/48!
Antwort von elbi:
30 will benefit the area vorserst no standart. 24p will prevail, because the different markets (50Hz & 60Hz) nunmal demand format one, which in all required formats can be converted without quality loss. that is only possible with 24p or better 23.98PsF.
Antwort von inwa-kamera:
Turns 30 FpS implied standard?
No, because the HDTV Reciver, only 50 HZ So 25fps support. See the minimum requirements for HDTV Reciver (Page 19):
http://www.eicta.org/files/LICENSEAGREEMENTpdf-104816A.pdf
Who is HDTV is really worth to read here:
http://www.beepworld.de/members99/hdtv/hdtv.htm
Antwort von prem:
Who is HDTV is really worth to read here:
Fascinating: As a chain of reasoning with false facts is established. For at least the quoted article in the video claimed s.None point that a PAL device shows a better HDTV picture than the reference.
Antwort von PeterM:
Let me tell you straight away here we're not about Pal or NTSC so that ultimately Signalkopressionverfahren were originally geährleisten to the limited bandwidth of the fersehübertragung too. All uncompressed SDV vefahren derived starting from the premise, yes.
For 50 Hz and 576 lines and 60fps 480 lines stop revealed nearly the same rate.
Where is the question of Frquenz.
The original idea behind was indeed adjust the Frame Rate of the Local netztfrequenz. Page was found on one (in the prior 30 years lying to sischtgerätebau tangible benefits is obviously no longer the case) and a fortiori in the host area.
Even today sychronisieen are professional playback systems such as hard disk player for the studio area, but synonymous in the past such as Analog Systme Draw or videodisc to Netztfrquenz unless they are using genlock on something else compels.
Especially in the host field ever in the amateur level it is synonymous with Beleuchtungflikerproblemen expect in the future.
Therefore, it should not be synonymous in the foreseeable time to come to a unified frequency behavior. The werdenn built some devices for 50 or 60 HZ is not surprising, since regardless of the Netzfrquenz there are lots of regional models, the spec for the U.S. or Japan hegestellt.
Moreover, one should not forget the dikussion China (the country where I'm productions) and have the PAL 50 Hz standard.
The road will go safely in Zukinft in the area as semi-norm technique of multi-Z! etc find out. In the movie they will still work with 24 FPS, at the already mentioned change in all formats easier. At best in digital film productions that are planned for movies it is to hire 48 Hz if you intentionally left out the Filmöook. But I think that is more synonymous with the Introduction of the 4K one format will be pursued on a large stalk.
The vision devices, especially in the lower price, all with 60 HZ refrsh work is due to the ignorance of the Manufacturer. As long as there is not a serious front side of the building is not synonymous Manufacturer basic type as that change, especially as to dazzle the consumer always easy keyoptionen of another resolution, contrast etc without the computational performance of the total signal chain / gets its Focus to create
Antwort von inwa:
Who is HDTV is really worth to read here:
http://www.beepworld.de/members99/hdtv/hdtv.htm
Fascinating: As a chain of reasoning with false facts is established. For at least the quoted article in the video claimed s.None point that a PAL device shows a better HDTV picture than the reference. "Of course, the testers were synonymous curious to see if the Sharp with the best Resolutionbei PAL HDTV signals of its scaling may actually benefit from friendly lines number. And indeed, the Panal serving the HDTV format (1080i/720p) in a Presidential Sion, as they The 768-it does not display the Philips Referns quite succeed. The Comparison with the Loewe Individual SL HD did not show any different result. " Video 10/2005 Page 33
