Infoseite // VHS SVHS as AVI to PC HOW?

Frage von Helmi2:


Merry Christmas

I would like to digitize my VHS collection.
For two days, I play myself and get no green branch.

Experiment 1
My Haupauge 350 produces MPEG 1 and MPEG 2 files.
The quality is not convincing, and it must be converted to AVI for VirtualDub yet.

Experiment 2
My ATI 1800XT is synonymous capture videos. Only I'm too stupid to switch the input to PAL.

Experiment 3
Purchase of Pinnacle Studio Pros 700 - USB
That should be the solution. The USB device plugged and installed the drivers. The first attempt with VirtualDub worked without complaint and with good quality.
Then I installed the Studio software 10th With Studio, I could only create AVI files, although this had a lot of mistakes and were not used.
Even after the installation of VirtualDub has Studio 10 does not more of the USB video capture box.
Finally, I uninstalled Studio and had to find the shot to make things worse, the database has been install. The packet goes back to p.27 Stupid And that was the final last contact with the Pinnacle.

Now my question:

How do I get my videos as AVI file into the PC without straining my nerves next?

Help

Greetings
Helmut



Antwort von Markus:

"Helmut" wrote: Experiment 1 My Haupauge 350 produces MPEG 1 and MPEG 2 files ...
Experiment 2: My ATI 1800XT is synonymous capture videos ...
See FireWire FAQ">1st (c) Why do not capture using graphics card, TV card or video grabber?

"Helmut" wrote: Experiment 3: Purchase of Pinnacle Studio Pros 700 - USB
Since you have so you put two eggs in the nest: On the failure of Pinnacle Studio is reported (not only) here extensively and an A / D converter does not include one ... look yourself: Was ist besser: Dazzle 150 oder Pinnacle 500- USB ?

"Helmut" wrote: Was ist besser: Dazzle 150 oder Pinnacle 500- USB ?

How do I get my videos as AVI file into the PC without straining my nerves next? Was ist besser: Dazzle 150 oder Pinnacle 500- USB ?


Again, the already well-known contribution, this time a little lower next: FireWire FAQ">3rd If the setter is analogous.



Antwort von Helmi2:

At 27.12 will buy a canopus ADVC-55 Analogue / DV Converter for 210 euros and it is good, I hope.

Hohoho

Helmi



Antwort von Helmi2:

I need the software to capture Lets Edit 2, or is there no Qualtitätsunterschiede if I VirtualDub with disc reading?



Antwort von Markus:

With a Firewire-A/D-Wandler You are not limited to a particular video software. Whether it is in VirtualDub, I am not white (no VD-professional), but I'm assuming.

If need be, even the Windows Movie Maker (for Win XP suitable as standard amount), capture the images as a DV-AVI. Have you otherwise (yet) video editing programs?



Antwort von Helmi2:

Pinnacle Studio 10 NOT!

My software is Adobe Premiere Elements 2.0

Thank you would have the same questions are.

Greetings
Helmut



Antwort von Markus:

Good luck with the new converter and you still a beautiful Christmas Eve. ;-)



Antwort von MiXMaster:

Question:

can be synonymous with the AV converter Mpeg2 OR takes the record of increasingly vornerein in AVI?

ps is the really bad when a video of avi to mpeg converting than if you just captured to mpeg `?



Antwort von Helmi2:

The professionals have to say that AVI is better. Why? Shrug.

My problem was that the existing analog / digital converter of the TV and the graphics card are of poor quality.






Antwort von MiXMaster:

AVI synonymous naturally requires more memory, but my question is whether we can capture with an A / D converter only synonymous to AVI or MPEG?

Since I only need anyway Mpeg (Dreambox), it would be foolish indeed to work with only one transducer to which absorbs only in AVI.



Antwort von Helmi2:

In principle, any device, the analog video (VHS, S-VHS ..) in the PC is transferred by an analog / digital converter. Of which there are very many. Any TV card, many graphics cards and a lot of other USB devices like Dazzle of Pinnacle can do this. Most of the devices generate more favorable MPEG 1 and MPEG 2 files.

Only more expensive devices synonymous support the AVI format. Presumably for the reason that professionals always work in this format.

It is so synonymous to the quality of the conversion (analog / digital) for the expensive equipment is noticeably better.

Standard are analog / digital converter to create the only MPEG files.

Link



Antwort von MiXMaster:

understand, well I'm only 290, - for a PowerColor 850XT graphics card issued synonymous because the former has VIDEOIN!

Well ausugeben again just for a converter, I do not knows, I guess that it will not be much better the quality of her .......

My problem is actually only the VHS videos, all I have on LP!

NOW, on every recording I've dubbed s. below the edge such a cord of links to the right of the flickering. This is certainly due s.VHS tape and not s.meinem converter. How will I get the only path?



Antwort von Markus:

"Helmi2" wrote: The professionals have to say that AVI is better. Why? Shrug.
Which "professionals", he's not able to answer? AVI (or more precisely: DV-AVI) stores the data less (intraframe) compression, thereby handling the recordings are easy to work and the quality of products moving at a high level. Each high-quality A / D converter converts analog video is DV-AVI, and to the data via firewire s.den Calculator next.

MPEG2 convert only simple (or expensive) equipment directly from the capturing. Cheap devices often provide a corresponding quality. MPEG2 is stronger (inter-frame) is compressed, whereby the quality depending on the transducer material and more or less suffering. In addition, the handling of such material is not compressed so easily. One advantage is: MPEG2 takes up less space than DV-AVI.



Antwort von Helmi2:

It was meant my shrug.

There are now even some of my films digitized.

Canopus ADVC55 unpacked angschlossen and read.
The quality equivalent to what tape and give the recorder.

I am very satisfied.

Greetings
Helmut



Antwort von MiXMaster:

@ helmi

the quality is now really better?



Antwort von MiXMaster:

"Anonymous" wrote: @ helmi

the quality is now really better?

The quality is definitely better.



Antwort von MiXMaster:

sorry for the inquiry, but you have previously made about what your VHS to PC?

And what format mti characterized the ADWandler on now?
Does it make any sense to me if my goal is Endfomat Mpeg defenitiv?



Antwort von Markus:

The A / D converter converts the analog to digital video playbacks to (ie the same format as MiniDV camcorders) and the calculator collects these data as DV-AVI.

"" Guest, "" wrote: Does it make any sense to me if my goal is Endfomat Mpeg defenitiv?
It always makes sense if you want to edit the recordings yet. Is then compressed until the very s.Schluss (as you wrote: "... the final format MPEG"). ;-)






Antwort von MiXMaster:

Hi Mark,

So if I do not want to edit the videos (only cut a 4 HOURS VHS to pieces, nothing else), then gives me an AD converter something less?

I take the time to jump in Mpeg2.
Alleviated by DV-AVI and then to MPEG2?

thanks



Antwort von MiXMaster:

up ...

@ Mark,

the above question is already synonymous of me.

One more thing:

Can I capture synonymous with the A / D converter directly to MPEG2 the same, if so, then this makes any sense to buy a separate AD converters to take and not the graphics card? (I do not need all of Converting dv-avi to mpeg2)



Antwort von Markus:

"" Guest, "" wrote: Alleviated by DV-AVI and then to MPEG2?
This question can be answered as easily not. If you just change the pictures on DVD and dub with the quality of your DVDs are satisfied, then you indeed have nothing to change. Or do you see improvement?

Especially with so-good templates, the question arises to what extent they should invest more money in the maintenance of poor quality - unless the respective A / D converter features synonymous with a timebase corrector (TBC) and effective noise filter. A potential product would be the Canopus ADVC-300, aber der kostet gleich wieder einige hundert Euro mehr als ein "normaler" A/D-Wandler.

Canopus ADVC-300, aber der kostet gleich wieder einige hundert Euro mehr als ein "normaler" A/D-Wandler.
"" Guest, "" wrote: Canopus ADVC-300, aber der kostet gleich wieder einige hundert Euro mehr als ein "normaler" A/D-Wandler.
Can I capture synonymous with the A / Canopus ADVC-300, aber der kostet gleich wieder einige hundert Euro mehr als ein "normaler" A/D-Wandler.
D converter directly to MPEG2 like ...? Canopus ADVC-300, aber der kostet gleich wieder einige hundert Euro mehr als ein "normaler" A/D-Wandler.

This question was next up