Infoseite // Video Difference - / Stillimage-Tripod?



Frage von melone:


Hello,

Is there a difference between the two stand types, and can be used without detriment Camera tripods for video cameras?

It's all about the tripod without Videoneiger ...


Achso, and the connections are standardized in the stands for a Photo and Video Tilt Head (; always synonymous as it is called)? Can draufschrauben to any tripod or any Neiger one must note that what?

Thank you!

melon

Space


Antwort von B.DeKid:

Gude

Yes can ma

Video Tripods are usually / often a spreader, the legs connecting with each other.

Also, some or many "video tripods" ball shells have heads for recording the video heads. (; But actually, only the senior class of video tripods)

Otherwise, you can unscrew the Videoneiger synonymous as the photo heads on the tripods.

I Pesl. often use static images for high quality photo heads to keep the video camera. Who can not be waving as synonymous with good living.

MfG
B. DeKid

Space


Antwort von melone:

Thank you!

So in static shots, it would then therefore be no problems.

I'm looking for a tripod and synonymous found, only then I noticed that there is unfortunately a camera tripod, which has no ground spider.
I only have concerns that it may not be as stable as when panning a video tripod with spreader!?

What do you think?

Regards, melon.

Space


Antwort von Bernd E.:

"melon" wrote: ... ...... ein Tripod have only had concerns that it may not be as stable when panning ...
For the stability of other factors are more important than a spreader: Which tripod are you going for exactly?

Space


Antwort von melone:

Manfrotto C253

I've actually already decided for now, but I have doubts.

Space


Antwort von Bernd E.:

"melon" wrote: Manfrotto C253 ... ...
It's all very easy, the part reads: Since at the pan well to hold the tripod! If the low weight is your all-important criterion would be the same 936 of Manufacturers is the better choice, because this is a real video tripod with one amazingly good price-performance ratio. Using the search function of the forum you will find this a whole lot of contributions. Otherwise, of course, synonymous, so to speak "standard tripod" of this forum, the Velbon DV7000, always worth a look.

Space


Antwort von B.DeKid:

http://www.fotokoch.de/fotowelt/Bilora_Stativ_Video_Pro_Doppelprofil_25673.shtml?prepage=stative.shtml

That's pretty neat process ... but as Bernd already said a spreader is not necessary ... see below

MfG
B. DeKid

Space


Antwort von B.DeKid:

Note ... if tripod is too light it can stabilize with a sandbag to the mounts.

MfG
B. DeKid

Space


Antwort von melone:

"Bernd E." wrote: "melon" wrote: Manfrotto C253 ... ...
It's all very easy, the part reads: Since at the pan well to hold the tripod! If the low weight is your all-important criterion would be the same 936 of Manufacturers is the better choice, because this is a real video tripod with one amazingly good price-performance ratio. Using the search function of the forum you will find this a whole lot of contributions. Otherwise, of course, synonymous, so to speak "standard tripod" of this forum, the Velbon DV7000, always worth a look.


Unfortunately it ;-) I'm looking for a lightweight tripod if possible, as it is with the holidays and I'll be traveling a lot. A Stillimage to be used on them. I want to use at home, but synonymous.
When the C253 is stable when panning, it would be optimal. Unfortunately, I do not know. Got it synonymous found in any store.

The 3.5 kilograms of the DV7000 I have to travel too much. I wanted to buy me on my last trip already, habs me but then changed their minds.

Space



Space


Antwort von melone:

"B. DeKid" wrote: Note ... if tripod is too light it can stabilize with a sandbag to the mounts.

MfG
B. DeKid


Hmm, good idea ...

Now I just got that when I take the C253 that because I do not crank for height adjustment had s.Tripod.

Oh man, that is so difficult to find a tripod to ...

Space


Antwort von Axel:

"melon" wrote: "B. DeKid" wrote: Note ... if tripod is too light it can stabilize with a sandbag to the mounts.

MfG
B. DeKid


Hmm, good idea ...


The main feature of the Manfrotto tripod is that it is made of carbon fiber instead of aluminum, in my view a poor advantage. "As it is with the holiday" it makes sense to take the sandbag as agreed value auto napkin on his head ;-)))

"melon" wrote: Now I just got that when I take the C253 that because I do not crank for height adjustment had s.Tripod.

My 08/15 has Velbon so'ne crank, but frankly there is a slight difference in height adjust - if it's time needs to go a little faster - a lot more comfortable on the angle of the legs. (My ancient Linhoff an estimated late 60s, but top in shot) has no more in such a crank as our semi professional Sachtler.

Space


Antwort von Bernd E.:

"melon" wrote: ... because I do not crank for height adjustment had s.Tripod ...
Whether or crank clamping ring or what ever synonymous: the height of the center column you should apply anyway as little as possible, the next the center column is extended, the more unstable the structure. Actually you do with the three-legged on a monopod.

Space


Antwort von melone:

OK, let's forget it with the crank ;-)

It's really hard to find a compromise.
I've been lent cheap tripod with only one filmed. Since I hold noticed when panning that mitverdrehen the legs naturally a little bit. I just did not know how the Bilora vehält when panning, because it is not a video tripod, and has no Mittelverstrebung.

Do you think that the success of the pans with Manfrotto better than with a cheap video Tripod (; cheaper) than the Manfrotto?

Space


Antwort von B.DeKid:

I'm of Manfrotto carbon tripods, so you can indeed synonymous draufschrauben nen video head but are fairly easy .... but depending on the Camera and rotational movement that is already acceptable


As can be synonymous poising a backpack aka use Stillimage / film pouch.

@ Axel ... the with the napkin was brilliant ;-)

Bzgl. Crank
I realize that here is always a



MfG
B. DeKid

Space


Antwort von Fridu:

I myself use the Manfrotto Carbon Tripod 055CXpro4. Is extremely stable, fibriert and trembles when pan is not synonymous, is high off without center column exactly my eye level and only 2 n.schwer. This is a travel tripod combines all the advantages for me and is still easy, it would never give up. Not exactly cheap, but just ensure stable and easy.

Manfrotto Carbon Tripod 055CXpro4

Universal, very lightweight and compact camera tripod with carbon legs (; 4 sections), with magnesium-mounting plate (, 3 / 8 "and lock screws) for Manfrotto
Tilt heads, leveling bubble, four Beinanstellwinkel be locked,
Telescope extracts with quick, rubber feet, long center column
synonymous horizontally mounted, Black Color
- Tripod legs and center column from 100% carbon fiber
- Head plate and stand shoulder-magnesium
- Length closed 54 cm pushed together
- Minimum working height 11 cm
- Max. Working height (; center column retracted) 130.5 cm
- Max. Working height (; rutted center column) 165 cm
- Weight 2 kg
- Maximum load capacity 8 kg

Of greeting

Fridu

Space


Antwort von beiti:

"melon" wrote: I am looking for a lightweight tripod if possible, as it is with the holidays and I'll be traveling a lot. [...] The 3.5 kg of DV7000 me to travel too much. Exactly the problem I had synonymous. I then landed on Velbon CX-686, has the same head as the DV -7000 and weighs complete about 2 kg. ) For purposes Stillimage however, it is not so ideal (; missing portrait rotation, large adapter plate, and can not unscrew the head, unfortunately.

Find out more on
http://forum.slashcam.de/velbon-dv7000-vs-cx-686-vt72315.html
http://forum.slashcam.de/erfahrungen-with-leichten-velbon-stativen-vt70048.html

Space


Antwort von melone:

"beiti" wrote: "melon" wrote: I am looking for a lightweight tripod if possible, as it is with the holidays and I'll be traveling a lot. [...] The 3.5 kg of DV7000 me to travel too much. Exactly the problem I had synonymous. I then landed on Velbon CX-686, has the same head as the DV -7000 and weighs complete about 2 kg. ) For purposes Stillimage however, it is not so ideal (; missing portrait rotation, large adapter plate, and can not unscrew the head, unfortunately.

Find out more on
http://forum.slashcam.de/velbon-dv7000-vs-cx-686-vt72315.html
http://forum.slashcam.de/erfahrungen-with-leichten-velbon-stativen-vt70048.html


Because the CX-686, I have long been considered synonymous ...
On my list now stands
- (Bilora C253; Material Carbon, weight 1350g)
- (Bilora A253, Material Aluminum, weight 1590g) <- identical with C253
- Velbon CX-686 (; Material Aluminum?, With head weight 2000g)

As with the aluminum and carbon (; would actually do this is to open a new topic )!!??

The C253 weighs 1350g of carbon, the same design A253 aluminum weighs 1590g. Both have maximum loudly Manufacturer. Load of 4.5 kilograms.

Question: Which is more stable?
Follow-up question would be how many grams of carbon must be used to hinzubekommen the same stability as the aluminum tripod.
Now, if the carbon tripod weighs less true, but it would have the same stability as the aluminum tripod, then the advantage would be the C253 compared to the A253 "only" at the weight.
If, however, now as much carbon was used as the aluminum tripod, then the advantage would be the C253 compared to the A253 not only in weight but synonymous with stability.

Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash