Frage von alles:
---
Antwort von Crookie:
presumably was made by the gebrauch link already deleted
Antwort von alles:
---
Antwort von Axel:
That is, as the name implies, an upload dialog. If there is a trick to get s.dein Picture, I do not know him.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
ne, it goes again, thank you! What goes?
Nothing goes - can not your time KunstWerk post here as an attachment?
and "... www2. ..." in a link to post so I do not know
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von alles:
---
Antwort von ksr:
So, be honest: Of the 4 options I think only the 1st (; unedited) for useful. 2-4 simply look unnatural, just not sure the Lord wants to see with such a red face and red nose ...
At 2, the contrast too much, 3 acts like hand-colored (; like an older film, this is certainly not required!) And 4 is false.
It seems to be a private party to act, and acts as 1 unique s.natürlichsten, synonymous when it might appear unspekatkulär ...
If you want to make the crisp picture, you must s.mehreren wheels turning (; contrast, brightness, gamma ,...) and (not quite as strong, food and skin color should still be considerable) ...
Antwort von alles:
---
Antwort von ksr:
Depth? But it's the same in every picture!?
On some, only the contours more (;) by increasing the contrast emphasized by those who stand out a bit more from the background, but does nothing s.der depth (and the leaves are not synonymous) by changing color correction.
Antwort von Shiranai:
This test has failed in any case :-)
So I think the original still synonymous s.besten. The other 3 flatter the gentleman with the little red nose, not exactly.
If they had filmed just the food, maybe would look with such an elevated colors quite well.
Antwort von Clemensch:
So I would like it very well ->
Antwort von alles:
---
Antwort von Clemensch:
How are you going to bring out more detail later in the Picture? I did not check!
Regards
Antwort von Axel:
I want to get that video out for less real, but artificial, "never cease", with much more detail (; HDRI). HDR does, in fact, less "real off". Your Stillimage but offer in each category, with a Picture of it after an artificial, artistic, artistically can explore as a deliberate intention to only banal reality, snapshot aesthetic. A spectacular look assumes that the picture in the manner and way as you are capturing (; not separate them:
Why are capturing it), synonymous has something to offer. A color correction equal to the Picture of any kind can only worsen next.
Keywords are limited to essentials (; omit inessential, but there are already too
many details, all just totally uninteresting), highlighting the ad (, what
is the motive?), Image composition, dealing with light. The sharp photographs Balkans menu that has been bleached in a PVC protective cover of the sun, has synonymous unreal colors, but colors are unreal, are to have slightly and prove nothing.
Antwort von alles:
---
Antwort von PowerMac:
I find everything awful. Most likely I would "take normal, unprocessed Picture and revving a bit of saturation, making possibly the white sounds a little brighter, in the direction of Glow.
Antwort von alles:
---
Antwort von alles:
---
Antwort von PowerMac:
It looks terrible from (; Picture impression and) artifacts. No idea how you're taken, but such artifacts are not normal.
Antwort von alles:
---
Antwort von PowerMac:
I told you I have no idea how you're taken. Besides, I do not know your software, do not know what effects you use, whether you benutzst it properly ...
Antwort von alles:
---
