Frage von Osteo:
I am in search of a camcorder, the HD-ready film material absorbs. Full HD, I do not need, since my television itself is only the HD-Ready Resolutionhat. Unfortunately, I am totally newbie in this matter. I myself have already tried the whole source, but not really come to a correct result.
My requirements:
I am leaving in a month on vacation and would like to make it a nice reminder videos in HD-Ready Quality record. I did not synonymous with a tripod or other to work.
What are your experiences with hard-camcorder SD Card camcorder or MiniDV camcorder, the HD-Ready Quality recording?
Which ones are highly recommended?
Cost:
I'm ready to max. 800 - 900 Euro spend. But the cheaper the better.
My PC Extras:
I currently only have a MacBook with 1.83 GHz and 2GB RAM. A not very good graphics card and 250GB hard disk (external disk with 500 GB but it is available). Extra a new PC for the camcorder I will not buy me. It is therefore now available with the Macbook work.
If further information is needed, just write.
Antwort von Osteo:
Please purchase in the area of advice to move.
Did I accidentally made a mistake in the forum area.
Thank you
Antwort von Daigoro:
As is almost everything relating to it:
http://forum.slashcam.de/neukauf-camcorder-geeignet-fur-pc-leistung-vp305944.html
Genuine "Full HD" is not a consumer camera anyway and what the record 720p are rare (and usually the cheap, you can not recommend anyway).
So, the 'usual suspects' Canon, Sony, JVC HD.
A tripod (or stabilization) should we still use, otherwise you look at the dirty schoesten holiday memories with Scheiss shaky images - video cameras are not as forgiving as cameras.
Antwort von Quadruplex:
I am in search of a camcorder, the HD-ready film material absorbs. Full HD, I do not need, since my television itself is only the HD-Ready Resolutionhat. Almost all HD camcorder filming in 1440 x 1080 or 1920 x 1080th Makes no difference, however, if your current TV can not show it - a little more sharpness and never harms your next Television is certainly a FullHD with device - except for a few favorable plasma or LCD bargains, there are no TVs, no more.
What are your experiences with hard-camcorder SD Card camcorder or MiniDV camcorder, the HD-Ready Quality recording?
Which ones are highly recommended? Here you read the discussions relating to "AVCHD and why it is only with difficulty can edit" with - and then you buy an HDV camcorder.
Antwort von wolfgang:
So concrete:
If you want HDV, then the Canon HV30 recommended.
If you both AVCHD as synonymous mpeg2-HD want to look at the new JVC HD40 to. The records in both formats on hard drive on.
If you just want AVCHD, it would be the Canon HF100, which SonySR11/12, or synonymous, the upcoming Canon HF11 recommended.
That in AVCHD editing is difficult, has already been said - on fast PCs ists barely doable. Like the MacBook on your looks, I can not say - in case of doubt, a device with HDV or MPEG2-HD recording, or previously Testschnippsel from the network and provide a look how it goes.
Antwort von Osteo:
Thanks in advance.
The Canon HV30, I've already synonymous views on the HP, but is miniDV (HDV) is not on the "extinct"? Did I read somewhere times.
The "problems" which I with my MacBook with AVCD most likely will have, as too slow to convince me in this direction is not necessarily synonymous.
And SD cards with 16GB cost synonymous s.die 40 ¬.
For this reason I have a stupid question:
How does it because from miniDV cassettes. Is there always a new miniDV cassettes when they are full or you can write on the synonymous and thus longer use? Say if I have the movie on my PC for example, had then yes, I need no more storing miniDV cassette and this could be so again for the new films?
Antwort von Daigoro:
They can be synonymous to write about, but more than 2-3 times you should not do, otherwise it may be an increase in dropouts and ugly artifacts come.
At 2.50 per piece, but not synonymous huge investment in each new download.
Antwort von wolfgang:
Whether your Macbook is too slow or not, you'll see eh - I do not know. On the possible problem you were out. If necessary, a new device is not a problem - then it is good.
It is true that the age of the tapes to an end, and more and more devices on hard disks or memory chips set. But the band is holding a proven technology, technology, and the tape provides a stable medium for long-term storage for this - an argument which insoferne but is weaker than you today yes 750 GB hard disks already in place for around 80 euros gets.
Of course you can on mini-DV tapes more often than once a film - but especially for HDV around the time I did not. And because the format one rear backup tape is missing - and so you have no protection against the loss of some images (called droped frames, can contain up to 12 photos, if you have the beginning of a GOP structure erwischt). And since I prefer new tapes.
The discussion tapes against chips / disks is ancient - and a question of inclination. Both systems have pros and cons, we decided to stop for a system and then live with the respective strengths and weaknesses. You have the choice and you should take what is thee more.
Antwort von veejay:
Hello,
tapes are (and remain) for me a very inexpensive and hassle-free vorallem archive. Whether DV or HDV. Why should they become extinct just because new is coming, that is chic and the driving technique in the man respond?
The data is wonderful, I have not myself with AVCHD rumschlagen and so does my PC completely synonymous sufficient.
Incidentally, I see in recent times more and more stores with vinyl records,
while the pressure from powerful CD MP3 has.
tapes, there is really very long. Data that are often synonymous in itself change or be updated, as have significantly poorer half.
Enjoy mystery
