Logo Logo
/// 
Gewichtsangaben bei Flycam / Glidecam

Weights for Flycam / Glidecam



Frage von FaultierSid:
Dezember 2010

Hi,

I've got a quick question. From which physical models of the above background, the small balance systems are (; FC Nano / HD-1000) for cameras up to 700g or 1400g?
I mean, it's already clear that the leverage is greater for the larger models because of the length difference, but I can compensate with more weight.
The included weights exceed yes, at least for the Flycam Nano already own to the manufacturer.

These things are not made of plastic, but that should not fall apart at such 2x3kg load.


That it is possible to grab the Nano synonymous heavier cameras that have already proved many on Youtube.

However, it would be interested to know how come about this manufacturer.


Regards,
Tobi



Antwort von -ssSonyY-:

a guess would be that they just want to play it safe. Even if the parts to withstand virtually everything, as calculated theoretically, but it can happen that one or another part of the burden does not stand up and breaks down ...



Antwort von Blackeagle123:

Because otherwise the camera too far down it is ... In any case, with a Steadicam. With a dolly system are effectively competing security reasons.

Maybe you should take a steady drive system? I am very satisfied. This can be upgraded with other spring and cameras use up to 12kg.

Greetings!








Antwort von FaultierSid:

"Blackeagle123" wrote:
Because otherwise the camera too far down it is ...



Hi, I understand not be so completely. Why then the camera is too far down? I think it is all on the same Steadycam Height in hand.

Do you mean the distance from the handle to the Camera?
He looks at least on photos at the Glidecam 1000 and 2000 from about the same length.
A shorter distance but should allow for less synonymous with the balance weights ... and not difficult.

Can you explain again what you mean exactly?


Regards,
Tobi



Antwort von Maze:

Have a Flycam 5500, it is me because of the heavy burden of the camera (about 8kg) and the middle of cheap processing operation flown apart. the screw that holds the gimbal is broken. was due to the quick reaction of the camera field still in flight. I would think so again.



Antwort von soan:

Hmmm ...

one should bear in mind that some people synonymous (I) provides out with Flycam nervous and would like to again perform daredevil maneuvers. This connect with security forces significantly higher than in the simple "limbo".

(Example: connected wild chasing over stock and stone with wildest camera angle)

So it is understandable from my point of view taken into account the additional buffer for the Manufacturer eien occurring centrifugal forces. This fact should be much higher than you might think Sun



Antwort von FaultierSid:

So probably rather material failure: /

I've ordered yesterday the Flycam Nano, it will (probably) run with the 550d. The is fortunately not so hard that I would be very concerned me well over the recommended weight to come.

@ Maze

I would like to know if you have attached after the gimbal with nervous new screw or do you use the Flycam present no more fear of the expensive equipment?




Antworten zu ähnlichen Fragen:
Glidecam HD 2000 Alternative
Der Glidecam Thread
Schraube für Glidecam HD-1000
FS700 mit Shogun Erfahrungen? Glidecam?
Gummifüsse von Glidecam lösen sich
Fokussierung als "one man show" bei einer Kamera auf Steadicam/Glidecam

















weitere Themen:
Spezialthemen


16:9
AI
ARD
AVCHD
AVI
Adobe After Effects
Adobe Premiere Pro
After effects
Apple Final Cut Pro
Audio
Avid
Avid Media Composer
Cam
Camcorder
Camera
Canon
Capture
Capturing
Clip
EOS
Editing
Effect
Error
Export
File
Files
Film
Final Cut
Format
Formate
HDR
Import
JVC
KI
Layer
Light
MAGIX video deLuxe
Magix
Microphone
Monitor
Movie
PC
Panasonic
Pinnacle
Pinnacle Studio
Player
Premiere
RAM
RED
Recording
Red
Software
Sony
Sound
Studio
TV
Tape
Video
Videos