Frage von embee15:
Hello,
hab ne very simple question ...
I have an Athlon 2000 + with 512 MB of RAM. Create The entire film is perfect, only the rendering of an hour of video (DV format to MPEG in DVD quality at 7000 kbps) insert lasts as 3-4 hours (with no new transitions), only about 5 short subtitles throughout the movie.
Can anyone tell me from experience how much a store would have approximately doubled to 1 GB in speed?
10%? 50% More?
Thank you for your info.
Antwort von Marco:
While this is somewhat synonymous dependent of the particular software, but the Ram brings it usually nothing. The rendering is running on the CPU.
Marco
Antwort von AndyZZ:
Perhaps it would bring something if you could create a RAM disk investors and the temporary directory during rendering there. So to speak as a virtual hard drive. That however, it should be more than 1 GB.
Whether it actually works, I do not know.
Greeting
Andy
Antwort von Fan29:
I do not think that would bring something, because the hard drive too slow for the RAM is used. That slows down the calculator perhaps from even more.
Antwort von embee15:
Thanks first time ...
Viewed only as the Comparison and so I'll buy soon nen new calculator ... :-)
How long does it take for you (assuming you have a "current" Calculator) the rendering of 1-hour movie?
Antwort von AndyZZ:
How long does it take for you (assuming you have a "current" Calculator) the rendering of 1-hour movie? Can not say so flat ...
If nothing was done except s.Film cuts that goes much faster than real time. Do you have screens and effects, perhaps even color correction and Image Stabilization in there, then the time may already be the 3 - and multiple real-time.
And if you After Effects what rausrenderst with many layers and effects ... I have time to render a 20sec clip, which lasted more than 2h!
Greeting
Andy
Hardware: Athlon XP 3200 +, 1GB RAM
Antwort von MiXMaster:
[quote = "AndyZZ"]
And if you After Effects what rausrenderst with many layers and effects ... I have time to render a 20sec clip, which lasted more than 2h!
Greeting
Andy
Hardware: Athlon XP 3200 +, 1GB RAM Hi,
I could tell there for days .....
Gruß Jörg
Antwort von embee15:
Shocker ... Of what I've read faster than real time?
I do so maximally 3-4 cuts per film, and maybe add a 10-10sec little book and it takes 3-4 hours ...
So it views a new PC ...
Antwort von MiXMaster:
The compression to MPEG format required for each quality level, bit rate and evt deinterlacing or other trifles synonymous again some render time.
I think output in real time (or faster) is really only possible in cases where, except for cuts and minimal use of screens, no further effects were used and the output format takes place in a not very rechenlastiges compression format. DV AVI here I am counting on a not very rechenlastigen format. MPEG more likely to have.
And something else is: 7000kbps for a DVD MPEG not a bit much? I would not be surprised if there so many DVD players do not hinterherkommt or am I mistaken?
Antwort von embee15:
Do not know, I stopped on the advice in this forum at a constant 7000 kbps and no problems with it.
Perhaps with really old DVD players?
For the computation: If the statement with real-time for DV-AVI was, I am reassured. I just get 3-4 hours of the MPEG-compression, and since I have been interested if a new calculator that perhaps riff in 1 hour.
Antwort von derknilch:
A new calculator could create even in well under an hour. Some MPEG2 encoder scale almost linearly with increasing frequency and additional processor (cores). SSE2 and SSE3, which may also be unable to present the AthlonXP, can significantly speed up the rendering then another.
However, not every application will benefit not synonymous, and each encoder as good of more power.
Oh yes - some encoders are synonymous much faster than others. TMPEG, ProCoder and HCEnc example, are much faster than, say, or QuEnc CCEnc.
Antwort von Jörg:
Hi,
Bitrate 7000, he is absolutely critical, because even if audio not work with them.
To render times: The time that is needed to encode avi to mpeg Of course, depends of the factors from the CPU performance and efficiency of the encoder.
Yes, synonymous here is now a factor of 0.5 results of RT in the software encoding possible.
That I get to the MC with H.264, CPU P4 3.06, therefore, anything but a racing machine.
Gruß Jörg
