Frage von WilhelmH:
Hello,
would like to see a MiniDV camcorder to the beginners class (up to 350 ¬) to buy, but in spite of long Internet searches do not find out what the best of this camcorder has image stabilizer. No or minimal BAND NOISE would be synonymous to me very important and a wide-angle lens, one can unscrew synonymous. - Who can give me a tip?
Schöne Grüsse aus Mannheim
Antwort von hamburgerjung:
Quite simply:
HDD Camcorder
Tripod
That with the "best" stability is an issue that can not be all too easily can clarify.
Many believe, an OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is better than one EIS (Electronic Image Stabilization).
Theoretically, the view is synonymous correctly, an EIS reduces the Picture, the image quality suffers.
In practical terms, I notice no difference between a cam with an EIS and OIS with!
But if you really want quiet pictures, then I recommend you a Tripod. Can a 15 ¬ synonymous stativ as long as you do not want to swing.
You want to have a miniDV, which absorbs no drive noise?
You should think about yourself in addition to your camera has an external Micro zuzulegen what you will but not on the camera mount! (Otherwise you have drive, but again it sounds.
A
WW-intent can be can be as good as it always screws.
But you should test your budget a bit "expand" ...
Antwort von jansi:
... had forgotten me log in ...
Antwort von WilhelmH:
Thanks for the great tips. Unfortunately, in the crucial moments, but then never a tripod here. It is a particularly good Image Stabilization already important. I was hoping that I get 2, 3 MiniDV devices may mention that in all the tests on Image Stabilization and wide-band noise above are truncated.
Basically I have the impression that Panasonic devices often particularly well-off. But somehow, I look at the multitude of the MiniDV camcorder and Tests simply not ....
Antwort von jansi:
The NV-GS230 of Pana is often recommended to be beyond your budget, unfortunately.
You can download the image stabilizers s.besten test where you are in a business going, where you have different cameras themselves kannnst test. (as is the stabilizer, as it is in their hands, etc.)
But let's face it, not so much bring the Image Stabilization is not synonymous, you should test times on a tripod shoulder / shoulder restraint (mean is of KAISER) to think. Cost is not much, but they are more effective than the possibility of stabilization of the Cam.
Antwort von jayt1234:
Hello jansi,
equipped with your info + instructions, I now go into the store and look at me the times offered to me a picture to make. Perhaps more than bring the test analysis, etc. ... .
Schöne Grüsse
WilhelmH
Antwort von Jan:
Panasonic GS 80!
VG
Jan
Antwort von WilhelmH:
Today's tour of various shops Mannheimer me next brought not synonymous. - But the reference Panasonic GS 80, the look is a clear word. I will regard this device yet smarter, but initial reports seem to confirm the recommendation really! Thank you.
MfG
WilhelmH
Antwort von Jan:
Canon has very good stabilizers synonymous, the small MD series but has other drawbacks - like a bad Wide Angle Or the self-noise problems. Sonywar has often been very good with their digital stabilizers, which can, but especially in the class to 350 ¬ now no longer say, HC 27 & HC 37 are in the discipline than average.
An optical stabilizer is not always synonymous should be better, JVC HD 7 has unfortunately shown, we must be good, but JVC hold, first optical stability in the price range of JVC (me if I remember correctly).
GS 230 is the more stable for me, slightly below the GS 80 classify, GS 230 comes with this huge 3 CCD, headphone output, microphone input, S-Video connection. GS 80 countered with mercilessly as good Angleund Wide Grid Appears on LCD line, which again GS 230 does not have.
SonyHC 47 one could still see (at the same endpoint number VAD and joint winner with 230 in the GS class) - naja Sonyhat but again the specificity with poor (or no) external battery choice - FH Battery own times and cable and the touch screen - WERS tolerates wems & gefällt ....
VG
Jan
Antwort von WilhelmH:
Hi Jan,
you have in the topic you really "eingefuchst" ... respect.
What is that with the wide impact of the supposedly already in some camcorders it should be. So far I assume that - if I decide to GS 80 (and everything at the moment speaks for it) - I look for a suitable synonymous need to buy wide angle lens (where you can get something cheap?).
The GS 80 missing by the way, the Fire-wire connection. Is it possible with USB2 as well in the computer games?
(Previously I had another VHS-C camcorder, did two years ago but for someone else synonymous something of a digital camcorder via fire-wire into the computer.)
MfG
WilhelmH
Antwort von Jan:
Hello WilhelmH,
GS 80 has 36 mm focal, and thus with HC 37 and GS 60 How wide is the best (if mans converts) to 600 ¬.
Panasonic 3 CCD their devices are in the sadly ill-discipline, often about 43-46 mm - interior is difficult to use without a converter.
Canon has made the new MD 42 mm focal models (40 with stable from).
GS 80 has the Firewire output, which has 95 in the case of almost all models are (up to a few JVCs and Panasonics - if I remember correctly). USB is in contrast to the GS 230 is not high speed - so no chance of the film in full quality via USB to play.
Converter does not need any model in which the originals would be VW-LW 3707 - but it is not cheap. Or stop another company with 37 mm thread.
VG
Jan
Antwort von WilhelmH:
Hi Jan,
Thanks for all the best evidence you have given me really helpful! Be my soon to GS 80 in T-Online Shop (Inexpensive esters provider I could find: 224.90 plus 9.90 shipping). Whether I use for my indoor shots (under the family Christmas tree, etc.) - despite the big wide effect on this device - will still need a wide-angle converter, I see ... then yes.
Again many thanks,
mfG
WilhelmH
