What robust little camera shoots reasonably well, Pana FT3 or SonyTX10
Frage von berno7: März 2011
I'm looking for beach, water, or for fast ... Panasonic to my 707 a little rugged camera that can be synonymous relatively good shooting. The SonyTX10 or Panasonic FT3 can probably both 1920 * 1080 50i and are waterproof, dustproof. Has anyone experience with the new models or the previous models and I can imagine the quality in relation to the 707? Can you live with it or will you be disappointed?
Antwort von Jan:
many shops, the TX 10 and the FT have won 3 or just this last week. Therefore, one can say is very limited on this.
The TX with 10 is almost certainly not be particularly good reason is the small 1 / 2, 33 "Sensor with 16! Million pixels.
Although this is around the back side CMOS, but with the pixel pitch is no good to expect.
The immersion time is synonymous limited to 60 minutes. Many divers are synonymous disturb the touch screen. The small battery (BN 1) is synonymous not particularly strong.
On the plus side, the Sony a 3-D mode, a very sharp LCD and has just your atypical design for a protected camera.
Many users will feel with the FT 3 better, because its predecessor FT 2 synonymous in many tests, the test was able to secure the victory underwater kings (image quality, speed and processing).
The FT 3 have a solid case, depth 12 meters (permanently), is a new barometer, depth gauge, altimeter, GPS.
Unfortunately, Panasonic has built no Back Side CMOS is the only got the sister TZ 22nd The FT 3, but 2 million pixels less than the FT 2 and to have a new main processor. The underwater king of 2011 should now more or less fixed already.
The price of FT 3 is very steep and the built-in LCD is synonymous of before yesterday.
In the film quality can be assumed of approximately 300-400 ¬ HD camcorders, no excessive high Sharpness synonymous the low-light performance is rather bad. What synonymous but the smallest aperture in wide Anglevon f 3.3 (TX 10 f 3.5) explains, with Sony still paired with the 16 million sensor.
I have both cameras there.
Although the Sony Stylish, an outdoor freak takes definitely more the FT 3!
Antwort von berno7:
many thanks for all the info. If I understand correctly, it's more better that the 2 million pixels FT3 is less like the FT2, right?
I read in some reports, however, that the FT3 is to use the little controls poorly, because I would rather like the Sony touch screen player, the advertised synonymous Panorama function would please me. But film-and image quality would be more important for me.
Antwort von Jan:
Unfortunately, I have the FT 2 no longer Comparison. In the last Panasonicmodellen has a new main processor (at FT 3 Venus Engine FHD signal processor) is almost always provided for an improvement, certainly with less number of pixels and the same sensor surface.
Handling is such a thing, I like really no touch screen. Many divers have criticized the synonymous with me strongly.
That is why my new sony handy touch screen no longer synonymous, but the old one already.
Controls are as a matter of taste, the picture quality is relatively difficult to TX 10. But you will find your buyer synonymous. User just looking for a stylish protective camera, like the old TX 5th
Antwort von Jan:
synonymous advertised the Panorama function would please me.
Panasonic has a panoramic function so synonymous, but somehow it has not arrived at Panasonic in 2011, which is a panoramic image after image is simply annoying. Canon is not synonymous better .....
Sony, Olympus and GE in the spring of 2010, the first company with pan panorama, autumn arrived Fuji and Casio with 360 panoramic ° thereto, there are now synonymous Nikon cameras with them.
Although containing the question should be how often you make panoramic images. The TV is always just a piece of show and you scroll left to right and back again .....
If you think the 3-D panorama, which are synonymous lately, so is nice, assuming a 3-D TV. I've seen s.einer NEX was the first time, ok.