Frage von popaj:
Hi All,
where should video producers really health insurance?
Normal statutory, private or KSK?
I'm stumped at the moment because something?
Thank you.
Antwort von ksr:
The Artists' fund is not strictly speaking - you must still at a health insurance (no preference) be whether privately or publicly insured, your insurance only pays the KSK () synonymous for pensions and long term care insurance, you pay a contribution to s.The KSK whose Height is determined by your income.
To get into the KSK to, you'll have an artistic / creative activity to be - what exactly is meant under it, you find here:
http://www.kuenstlersozialkasse.de/wDeutsch/kuenstler_und_publizisten/voraussetzungen.php?navanchor=1010025
Antwort von Pianist:
I'm stumped at the moment because something? The question I do not understand. But you have to know yourself whether you are stumped or not ... :-)
But now times in earnest, including health insurance is an important issue. Where do you need or can assure you that of course depends from the individual circumstances, so for example if you the principal filming or part-time operators, what are you doing and exactly how it is organized. Ultimately, all you have three options are possible, with the KSK, the variant is unlikely. Can you give more info about this?
Matthias
Antwort von popaj:
Yes stumped with, I mean that I do not exactly knows what it exactly with the KSK has on him. What is the really good?
I produce short films that are sold on the Internet.
Since I first it operated only way, I was still on
my job insured (ie the law), in the meantime this has changed and I work less and I now devote more of video production.
thanks
mfg Popaj
Antwort von carstenkurz:
If you are employed, the employer pays roughly half of your health insurance contribution, and you the other half.
If you are working independently, you will pay more or less both halves of itself
If the KSK takes you to pay a certain extent the employer's share, you pay as KSKler So then again only your share.
Something like this is to understand. The KSK is funded from various voluntary payments and pushes at the KSK-insured clients of payments (such entities have in fact in the employment of independent KSKler saved '). Who these people then instructed to get sooner or later a demand for payment of the KSK, and then everything that comes in large pot.
- Carsten
Antwort von Pianist:
The KSK is funded from voluntary payments and drives a div of such entities of KSK-insured payments No, wrong. This has nothing to do with now, although the original question, but then we's make just one time KSK-thread. The KSK force law raises the artists' to all the benefits of independent artists, and regardless of whether the insured to it or not. New members only to take anyway, if they are doomed. It therefore has nothing to do with the membership, but to levy duty is the performance as such. Recently RTL was sentenced to to all fees, s.Dieter Bohlen DSDS was paid as a juror to pay five percent of artists'. This will benefit all the starving artists of the pile itself is not at all as a member.
Because it already recognizes that this is a very questionable matter. A special treatment for people who can not be trusted to take care of themselves. This can be compared as follows: Every time I go with the U-Bahn, I am required to pay five percent of the ticket into a fund for needy taxi driver. They get paid for it cheap health insurance. New taxi drivers, however, are not included in the fund, because there is already enough to taxi drivers and the money is not enough. Sounds diagonally? Exactly how I see it synonymous. For taxi drivers this is not a reality synonymous. When "independent artists" already. And therefore I hope that with this nonsense will soon end. Self-Employed Persons means becoming synonymous to self-insure and do not take handouts from the state, which collects these handouts from other people.
Matthias
Antwort von stip:
I do not share your opinion, a taxi driver willing to pay the appropriate fare, almost always has a creative struggle to find a fair and appropriate pay his creative or artistic services. that is just in the early years of independence in such a way where I find the concept of regulatory KSK.
Antwort von carstenkurz:
It is so synonymous have a reason why the KSK is not any self exempts active, but only certain professional groups. As someone has at some time just thinking what to do. And these were certainly not the artists themselves, who have since operated so hard lobbying ;-)
Whether one now known as alms or funding, subsidy, what I know. The German film industry collects actually synonymous 'charity' in the cinema industry and the Ors. Called film funding. We nunmal a political system with a certain, seasonally fluctuating attitude, not all social concerns subject to the law of the jungle.
- Carsten
