Frage von Stahl:
Have before me new camera for feature film project zuzulegen up to 2500 euro?
Of course I would have liked the best equipment?
I know that much of the cameraman, crew, etc. depends ....
Movies like "300" totally überanimiert appear and furthermore
in a permanent semi-attached to the sun of Greece seem to play quite a presumption to give.
If the only change to HD for me at all useful?
I have of Comp.-schnittprogr. no idea. Hear only constant whining in forums about Systheme, bugs, etc. and the best possible
for a marginally better picture.
My Casabl. is ca.5000 hours of operation on the other hand, has never crashed. In addition, the DV to film "Sounds of Fear" synonymous am very confident in the movies.
If from a good source of the rumor true "Spiegel TV"
HD even declines, the question is just what Hd now open for future projects is easy-if cutting opportunities exist.
Of course I would like the material is now cut in DV mode.
But I wonder whether such a use HD material that offers better
than a standard DV. Thank you for a brief suggestions.
Oh yes. Of course, one would like to serve as a starting material have the best.
But to be synonymous detailed images can be annoying. ZB. Skin of actors are also in Dv is not so easy to see and we must
not so much make up ....
Antwort von -ssSonyY-:
Movie camera? 2500 ¬? ...
perhaps time to think about Rental ...
http://www.arri.de/
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Have before me new camera for feature film project zuzulegen up to 2500 euro?
Of course I would have liked the best equipment? I always say yes Otherwise Canon XH A1 in such cases. Since you yes but "equipment" you say.
I recommend
Canon HV30
Vinten Tripod
Rhode Mic
Hama Filters (UV, Pol, ND, etc.)
Raynox Wide Angle intent
3 x Light (Baustrahler or "Pro" is just no preference)
This can be said about things like ...
- Steadycam
- 35 mm adapter
- Crane
- Dolly
- PC / Softwear
and still more light ;-)
... to think.
......... seem quite a presumption to give. Those who would?
If the only change to HD for me at all useful?
Can you say no, but yes HD is already "better" than DV, and therefore "only once" to recommend.
If from a good source of the rumor true "Spiegel TV"
HD even declines, the question is just what Hd now open for future projects is easy-if cutting opportunities exist.
Aha, do you now for I Net broadcasts or television broadcasts for their (and send your shipments at all as the HD signal?)
Well yes, but no preference is the case, there will be synonymous with the best possible quality prefer.
Oh yes. Of course, one would like to serve as a starting material have the best.
But to be synonymous detailed images can be annoying. ZB. Skin of actors are also in Dv is not so easy to see and we must
not so much make up .... As I see evil times the smallest drin. This as "against" argument to bring HD is - wrong.
.................
You can of course synonymous "good" used "DV Cams take even DigiBeta Cams, and properly staged, the images synonymous here good.
On the other Page, if you are already making the effort to build everything, then one can indeed synonymous with "better" camera (format) rotate.
The decision here can tell you nobody decrease.
Alla what I wish.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von Stahl:
Thanks for the detailed and good info!
Finally a great forum, where it is often synonymous differences
Opinions gibt.Leider synonymous with HD cams and editing.
I have so far only very simple filmed.PC90, but very successful.
Did the other hand, a thriller of a film school where everything really
agreed, only the dialogues were unbearably meaningless gesprochen.An the border with the comedy.
Why not during the filming, I noticed unerklährlich.
That means I want at such a project does not dissipate.
Even professional work as the TV "Nibelungen treasure, which is now expired, show what
I mean with "lameness" ... good because then the whole equipment synonymous nothing.
But we want the best starting material for all the trouble -
hence my question.
