Infoseite // Which DV Cam + should I take a pair of technical issues



Frage von Merl:


Hello everybody!

a new video camera is needed and I had to realize that I have no idea what it is, maybe you could help me.

First, a couple things that I still have a long time after reading did not fully understand:

1. If the video on MiniDV cassettes really saved digitally (ie, unlike in the Video8, which is analogous to work)? Please do not suggest, let me just be 100% sure:)
2. That with the 3-chip camcorders, I am not entirely clear, so the more chips the better, but how the feeling? How does the CCD size is 1 / 6 inches tall, or rather small?
3. It is often said that the video files after editing back to ne MiniDV tape is stored, the camera must be in a DV, or does it synonymous differently? Have not found so many who have one.
4. What is HDV in menschlischer Language? And whether it would be worth about sowas upon (price / performance):)
5. How important is the possibility of exposure, focus, manual white balance, etc. to be able to adjust? (It's pretty much filmed, but not on a professional level)

So and now to the camera itself
There is to be a MiniDV be
an optical Image Stabilization would be good
synonymous well would be a minimum of 20x optical zoom (10x wär me too little, I used s.mehr).
3CCD if it is really noticeable impact on picture quality and has
DV-input if it is absolutely necessary to DV videos back to save them.
The display must be in the sun does not adopt the same.
Vibrant colors are of course synonymous important.
When it would be possible, it should be synonymous not too hard, but is not decisive.
And the price, perhaps at 600-650 euros.

Panasonic NV-GS 320 (

Space


Antwort von Udo Schröer:

Hi Merl,
You need no advice more! You have everything important is already known.

And the 3CCD is better, I know it from personal experience.

Space


Antwort von wolfgang:

1) yes, is digitally stored

2) wants you to play back your camcorder, then the one in the DV input. But the devices are expensive, for tax reasons. Bad this property is not.

3) 3-Chiper separating the colors better, and thereby generate normally a better picture as a single chip. This technique is more expensive but synonymous with the equipment of Panasonic clearly predominating. The NV-GS 280 has not yet Ditialeingang, but it is priced quite favorable

http://geizhals.at/eu/a183106.html

The 300 already has a digital input, synonymous not much more expensive

http://geizhals.at/eu/a183111.html

and of the 320er you mentioned is still cheaper.

4) high definition video, which is in contrast to the previously mentioned devices, a higher screen resolution - namely, typically 1440x1080 pixels, in contrast to the previously mentioned PAL SD devices with 720x576.

If you have a plasma or LCD - ie a HD-Ready screen in 16:9 -, then these devices would be a consideration, because the older SD camcorder to HD-Ready screens are not very good. Constructed with prices but here, the more so for the 1000 to 1200 Euros. Here is the Canon HV20 is a good choice, or synonymous, the SonyHC3 / 7 You tend to stay in HDV, rather hands off of AVCHD devices - because of severe cut. And make sure that one of the HDV editing have a reasonably speedy PC needed.

5) is filming a lot, then you will learn about the possibilities of manual settings appreciate. Depends of you.

On the Zoom, I would not stiffen, other criteria are usually important.

Space


Antwort von Jan:

"Merl" wrote:

1. If the video on MiniDV cassettes really saved digitally (ie, unlike in the Video8, which is analogous to work)? Please do not suggest, let me just be 100% sure:).


Yes with intra frame compression factor of 5:1 to a truly digital tape

"Merl" wrote:
2. That with the 3-chip camcorders, I am not entirely clear, so the more chips the better, but how the feeling? How does the CCD size is 1 / 6 inches tall, or rather small?


Often the case, but not always, partly a religious war, eg the SonyHC 47 against the GS 230 has wiederlegt.

1 / 6 "is very small - entry sensor

A larger sensor is better zb Lowlightqualität, better opportunity with the depth to play, etc.

3 CCD but often has a worse Wide (consumer class)

"Merl" wrote:
3. It is often said that the video files after editing back to ne MiniDV tape is stored, the camera must be in a DV, or does it synonymous differently? Have not found so many who have one.



The other options cost a multiple of your camera, DV to refrain in almost every consumer.

"Merl" wrote:
4. What is HDV in menschlischer Language? And whether it would be worth about sowas upon (price / performance):)


1920x1080 (output) to 720x576 in a short form, HDV is here every day are compared, I do not now 2 page report.

"Merl" wrote:
5. How important is the possibility of exposure, focus, manual white balance, etc. to be able to adjust? (It's pretty much filmed, but not on a professional level)


I can not answer for you, since the majority of consumer film from laziness and ignorance eh filming in automatic - it's so ...

To take a good picture to get you in many situations simply leave the automatic. You will quickly determine if the AF times pumping because the contrast can not be ascertained or your camera for indoor shots at the car you WAG red & yellow stitch will turn on, etc.

VG
Jan

Space


Antwort von Jan:

Had I known the Wolfgang replied that I would ichs can save.

VG
Jan

Space


Antwort von Merl:

Thank you for your answers, it really took me further.

The NV-GS 300 is I think so saumäßig overpriced because they genomen of production was down and they barely get anywhere. Whether a DV-in is worth the price difference is that I have still superior.

A couple questions I have:
1. What manual settings except for the 3 I in the 1st Posting have mentioned are on the watch should be? ('m The guy who likes rumexperimentieren and with the Rotstich often synonymous, I have seen:)

2. What do you generally on the NV-GS 320 Would you a buy and if not why? What would you miss when?

Sorry if too many questions, such a purchase does not every day you would like it in retrospect not regret. :)

Sincerely,
Merl.

Space


Antwort von Jan:

1. For the price range, the GS 320 has a relatively large number of controls for the main film, there would be:

- Manual Focus (eh have all of the known current MiniDVs Companies)
- Manual white balance and a few Voreistellungen (synonymous actually have any)

- Shutter, Aperture and amplification in the numerical values known as Pana is obvious leader, even the entry-level GS 27 can already at very high Sonymusst you go around the shutter to be able to adjust itself.

The things which I now call (and often use), you get eh not (and then only if max 2) in the price range but I still count on times:

Tonaussteuerung-manual, s.besten like Canon with 2 channels
- Distance ring
- Zoom
- Zebra (via exposure hilfe)
- Peaking (Scharfstellhife)
- White Balance Hold - thus saving
- Switchable ND (gray) filter
- Aperture and reinforcement separately select manual (which can not Pana Consumer)
etc. ...

2. I think the 320 is their savings, despite a good camera, listed the things I would be missing, without a microphone input and headphone output, I would not be filmed, but the Normalo is synonymous so reluctant Micro s.oder an external review by the Sound Headphones (when the Headphones on has many would be surprised what you hear so everything)

It's always the question, the camera only Consumerlike used, or you have larger ambitions, then you just need the manual functions. Although synonymous, I recently met a cameraman, which, with a PD 170 almost exclusively in the auto rotate, well everyone what he wants.

VG
Jan

Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash