've sold my XM2 and HDV Cam ne search for synonymous transition, a good IR signal. (calculated runter 720x576) Next priority is to cut card.
Thanks in advance for your tips.
Gruss Rainer
Antwort von Wiro:
The Sony deliver excellent 16x9 SD Picture. Since you can not grumble. Have yourself a. Gruss Wiro
Antwort von Rainer Müller:
"Wiro" wrote:
The Sony deliver excellent 16x9 SD Picture. Since you can not grumble. Have yourself a. Gruss Wiro
Hi,
which there are many.
Gruss Rainer
Antwort von robbs:
runterskaliertes HDV material is basically always much better than directly in the dv-pal mode recorded material. (up to fast camera movements) gruß cj tip hc7/hv20
Antwort von Wiro:
"Rainer Müller" wrote:
which, since there are many
I know the HC1 and the FX1. Both good. The hardware converter will probably in all Sony's the same, I take at times. Gruss Wiro
Antwort von Rainer Müller:
"Wiro" wrote:
"Rainer Müller" wrote:
which, since there are many
I know the HC1 and the FX1. Both good. The hardware converter will probably in all Sony's the same, I take at times. Gruss Wiro
What do you of the HDR FX7
Gruss
Antwort von robbs:
The FX1 will soon no longer exist. In this Sonyist on the homepage already deleted. Since then, the prices on the Internet dressed.
FX 7?? With better equipment then the FX1
Antwort von Rainer Müller:
"Anonymous" wrote:
The FX1 will soon no longer exist. In this Sonyist on the homepage already deleted. Since then, the prices on the Internet dressed.
FX 7?? With better equipment then the FX1
Comparison F1X against FX7 cuts 7er but better?
Rainer
Antwort von usul:
"Rainer Müller" wrote:
Comparison F1X against FX7 cuts 7er but better?
Comparisons are always subjective. Some people claim that the FX1 would be the better camera. For me personally, the FX7 is clearly better (much lighter, wider zoom range and so much more flexible for me to use). Kommt halt depends on exactly what you need ...
Antwort von Rainer Müller:
"usul" wrote:
"Rainer Müller" wrote:
Comparison F1X against FX7 cuts 7er but better?
Comparisons are always subjective. Some people claim that the FX1 would be the better camera. For me personally, the FX7 is clearly better (much lighter, wider zoom range and so much more flexible for me to use). Kommt halt depends on exactly what you need ...
I need you for dancing events. I think because she is the better synonymous because of the zoom.
Rainer
Antwort von Udo Schröer:
The FX 1 has more chips! Alone this is a clear advantage. In direct comparison, there is, in my view, only the zoom of the FX7 brings an advantage. I myself am 6 weeks for the FX1 decided although it was expensive. The picture quality is simply awesome. All settings are considered.
"Rainer Müller" wrote:
"Anonymous" wrote:
The FX1 will soon no longer exist. In this Sonyist on the homepage already deleted. Since then, the prices on the Internet dressed.
would like again to my basic question back. I need ne Cam transition to HDV. That means first of next DV with more wide - and zoom. Final then gradually HDV
Gruss Rainer
Antwort von Rainer Müller:
Again a negative example.
www.taunusfotograf.de
On Event tab and then "Video"
My Page. Was made with XM2.
Gruss
Antwort von usul:
"Udo Schröer" wrote:
The FX 1 has more chips! Alone this is a clear advantage.
Again and again, interesting, smart sizes to compare. If you look at that instead of the chip size on the depth and Low-Light-focused behavior (because that is what you ultimately LOOKS), you should soon see that this supposed advantage of the FX1 is not None (who wants to be happy must the depth in the maximum telephoto range for both cameras to compare).
Antwort von Rainer Müller:
Hi,
I see it like that. The sensors are not the Allheiligtum. I think I see at present no alternative the FX7, or ..........
Gruss Rainer
Antwort von K.-D. Schmidt:
I would take FX7 (if I do not already have the HC1).
Greeting KDS
Antwort von wolfgang:
So both for depth as lowlight behavior plays the chip size has a significant role. The FX7 annoy me even more joints the CMOS chips with the now famous rubber effect that in the worst-case scenario can show. But everyone should see how he personally likes!
So today I would more than just filming HDV as HDV capture, edit in HDV - and spend as HDV. To view the film in high resolution on my plasma to enjoy. Do you have traditional standard definition DVDs do, for example, next to the material to be able to, then I do when the output from the timeline of the editing program. But an HDV filmed in high definition video will be received. It's now even on my old 3.2 GHz P4 with only 1 GB of Ram, the right editing program vorrausgesetzt. And every Aldi-PC gscheiten with a 2-core processor can now easily cut HDV.
Antwort von tobibonsai:
The Fx now with the HC1 to compare, so synonymous is like apples and pears.
"K.-D. Schmidt" wrote:
I would take FX7 (if I do not already have the HC1).
Greeting KDS
Antwort von tobibonsai:
again for your question: [what HDV camcorder delivers the best quality dv] with probably the best HDV quality! ... Of the aforementioned cams the FX1 seems not really to be sharp the FX7 to have some restrictions (low weitwinkel / rubber effect?) s.wurde the canon is not yet known (with the best visual / ton) and the HV20 are not in charge ... and the successor to the FX7 / 1 only in development! gruß cj
Antwort von wolfgang:
"Anonymous" wrote:
again for your question: [what HDV camcorder delivers the best quality dv] with probably the best HDV quality!
Need not necessarily be because you have seen in the down conversion of HD to SD anyway lose sharpness. Were on a test.
It is true but of course that the FX1 in comparison to A1 Picture Sharpness with lower returns - in the HDV range.
Antwort von Udo Schröer:
If you look at the video in HDV mode previously viewed and has then down converts the losses are already huge. But for Dv still very good.
Antwort von weitwinkel:
what losses? If the final result at sd 16:9 is to be there HDV cam with a 3-way there: in dv record (schlechtestet result) HDV material from the camera out downconverten or s.rechner! gruß cj
Antwort von K.-D. Schmidt:
Quote:
The Fx now with the HC1 to compare, so synonymous is like apples and pears.
This answer can only come of that myself and my equipment does not know. And then you should hold back elegantly.
KDS
Antwort von flyingeye:
what have you and your equipment with the quality of a camera to do? actually hingt the pear-apples comparison, however, since the HC1 in good light conditions even sharper pictures than the FX1! (in lowlight säuft but they are from) gruß cj
Antwort von Udo Schröer:
You should not even be in love with your Cams to be!
http://www.camcorder-test.com/camcorder.html
A test of neutral Slashcam.
I can understand better the image quality of the HC1 can be found nowhere. Other Active video video magazines come to similar conclusion.
"K.-D. Schmidt" wrote:
Quote:
The Fx now with the HC1 to compare, so synonymous is like apples and pears.
This answer can only come of that myself and my equipment does not know. And then you should hold back elegantly.
KDS
Antwort von flyingeye:
"Udo Schröer" wrote:
... I can understand better the image quality of the HC1 can be found nowhere. Other Active video video magazines come to similar conclusion.
then look at these pages: http://www.fxsupport.de/03.html
gruß cj
Antwort von Udo Schröer:
Have already read some time ago. Had I tried was synonymous individual videos. The fact was that my video editing software with the file was unable to cope.
Only in retrospect did I get an unmodified file the FX1 and the cleverly ran.
In my view, the files are no longer so original, because otherwise my program it had detected.
"Anonymous" wrote:
"Udo Schröer" wrote:
... I can understand better the image quality of the HC1 can be found nowhere. Other Active video video magazines come to similar conclusion.
then look at these pages: http://www.fxsupport.de/03.html
gruß cj
Antwort von Udo Schröer:
PS: There is no doubt the HC1 is a good camera, and synonymous, I have no money to give away! I know very well why I spent twice as much money did.
Antwort von flyingeye:
neither Edius Premiere Pro still had problems so that, it must sometimes. only the extension in m2t renamed. gruß cj
Antwort von flyingeye:
"Udo Schröer" wrote:
PS: There is no doubt the HC1 is a good camera, and synonymous, I have no money to give away! I know very well why I spent twice as much money did.
and what camera did you buy then? gruß cj
ps. Incidentally, I have neither an HC1 another FX1 but (inter alia) a FX7
Antwort von Udo Schröer:
I had a prior VX2100e, but because of the modest 16:9 Resolutionist my choice fell on the FX1.
While the zoom is somewhat lower, but I hold the larger CCD chips and all S-video inputs, etc. Photo function brauch eh I do not.
Antwort von Udo Schröer:
PS: the size of net since I would be the format of the FX7 has been preferred.
Antwort von flyingeye:
oh well I believe there are times the ideal camera, but it's not so. whether fx1/fx7/canon s.ect, all have their pros and cons. gruß cj
Antwort von K.-D. Schmidt:
Quote:
PS: There is no doubt the HC1 is a good camera, and synonymous, I have no money to give away! I know very well why I spent twice as much money did.
To avoid some misunderstandings: Of Verliebtsein into the camera, no question. I have a great synonymous Camera, about five times as expensive as the HC1. The slow I am reluctant, however, with the mountains around. It was then the small HC1 added, the FX7 there was not yet. And I would buy today if I had not already HC1. Three cameras (more precisely: four, because an old SonyPC100 still doing their services), although in some recording situations makes sense, but the money was last in first regular hardware and software investments.
KDS
Antwort von flyingeye:
What did you think of the euro Camera 15000th - it cost?
Antwort von K._D. Schmidt:
The Mustek DV 5000!
Antwort von Udo Schröer:
Then I read probably wrong! I was alsob You've written 5 X as expensive as it was FX1 but probably 5% of the FX1
Antwort von Wolfpeter-Hans-Dieter:
"K._D. Schmidt" wrote:
The Mustek DV 5000!
Haha, definitely. The Cam is a banger!
Antwort von biber65:
"Wolf-Peter Hans-Dieter" wrote:
"K._D. Schmidt" wrote:
The Mustek DV 5000!
Haha, definitely. The Cam is a banger!
Yes, the NEN has OIS, Zoom-and Belnden ring s.Lens, If to P2 cards in the formats to DVC Pro HD, Dv ... She has 3ccds with the 2.8 MP and is available in full HD 1080 i on (without pixel shift). Hammer wat part. Not to forget: Manual Tonaussteuerung, HDMI interface, 2 XLR jacks, and a matte ne Frenchflag is synonymous included
Power Including VAT: ¬ 14,099
Antwort von biber65:
Have again forgot a comma! 140, 99
Antwort von Wolfpeter-Hans-Dieter:
Already re-setting the wrong point: war is such things on eBay with even luck for 14,99 ¬! Ok, perhaps more for 30 ¬. But for all the great features is ja grad so. for example, Pirates of the Caribbean was rotated.
Antwort von TommyMeiers:
Do you know what it will cost a good Mustek? Nix da Da with 160 ¬ you have already einniges more hinblättern: 174.99 ¬. Below is nix. Yes all you have no idea ...
Antwort von Wolfpeter-Hans-Dieter:
Really? Well in any case there are such Cams in the style of Mustek on eBay already for 30 ¬. And I do not think that because the quality varies greatly!
