Infoseite // Which camcorder is best for me?

Frage von Flo K:


Good day,

Good, this issue had already once
mic yet but would look if someone helps me.

I'm looking for a camcorder,
the:

- Not to be too expensive (> ¬ 200)
- In the twilight / night filming may
- Good sound quality
- Robust
- Hire (injection) water is protected

So I do not know whether it is something in the price class,
but it should simply not be too expensive, since the videos are only for the internet eh excuse and the quality is not necessarily Fernsehtauglich be (of course, would not be bad).
Belongings before the device Outdoor use when fishing, as it should be just something to endure.
Storage media is no preference to me, because you know better what is appropriate, should then only on the PC can process.

Sod s.wars actually
maybe someone knows rat.

Gruß,
Flo



Antwort von geid0r:

Hi!

So for the price you actually get what little usable.
It was the "Want to buy a used camera.

There are the action-cams, which are all water-tight and take with max. Resolutionvon at 640x480. More on the Internet, you need not.

Look here, maybe something for you here:





Antwort von r.p.television:

I want you not to come close, but you are looking after the oft-quoted Eierlegende Wollmichsau.

To show the absurdity of your list for you, perhaps visual display, a translation into the passenger car sector:

I'm looking for a car that:

not to be too expensive (> 2000, - ¬),
loose 280km / h top speed creates
a consumption of less than 8 liters has
a payload of 800 kilos,
geländetauglich is full with amphibious mode!

The points in your list contradict each other even if you get the price with 20 multiplizierst.



Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:

"rptelevision" wrote: > 2000, - ¬,
loose 280km / h top speed creates
a consumption of less than 8 liters has
a payload of 800 kilos,
geländetauglich is full with amphibious mode!

The points in your list contradict each other even if you get the price with 20 multiplizierst.
Angesichts Deines first point Angesichts Deines Andreas



Antwort von spyro:

Hmm okay,
thank you in advance.

What can I do it because of the ~ 200 ¬ Cams expect
are so abnormal bad?



Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:

This is always on the demands for ... who thrilled with the MTV in mobile embarrassment turned them up like so happy. ¬ 200 is too close s.der mere toy class.
If you're really into the hobby video embarking want to put at least 400 euros. From this limit then you get something useful, if not synonymous with all your desired criteria simultaneously.
Good Lowlight capabilities you get s.2.500 ¬ in the prosumer class. But this point seems pretty overvalued ... namely, the question everyone here ;-)
If you have more than 200 absolutely can not afford, then ask friends and acquaintances in times around. Maybe someone still has an old Hi8 or so lying around and there for little money from. It is not unlikely, for many are the children and the Camera forgot ;-)
If you have something on ebay for small coin get want you want the object of desire before the purchase can watch, or at least pick up for cash negotiable.
BG, Andreas



Antwort von Flo K:

Okay,

"If you really amateur video embarking want to put at least 400 euros"

-> Ich sags mal so, so as a hobby is not thought
but rather to my hobby for others to make accessible.
So, no movies or something,
times but rather short clips and beautiful nature pictures
then what about a little show together will be cut.





Antwort von Flo K:

Again, I
The above posted video of me in the original Resolutionanschauen,
else arg ists already rotten.
But as the quality (stated in the original resolution), the bildschirmdeckender in size, is there?



Antwort von SebiG:

"Flo K" wrote: Again, I
The above posted video of me in the original Resolutionanschauen,
else arg ists already rotten.
But as the quality (stated in the original resolution), the bildschirmdeckender in size, is there?

Come on in Bidschirm. Am (CRT) television monitor s.PC yes but no.






Antwort von Martin Dienert:

Hello SebiG,

if you mainly videos for the Internet but want to think again about a more modern camera or a camcorder "the Aiptek after class.

On Thema Fotoapparat In this topic Thema Fotoapparat In
On the subject Aiptek there are many things to read here and somewhere you can find example determines synonymous videos. Z.B. das hier.

At All: Even at the risk here as a camera film to be verschrien and in the Aiptekschublade to hike, I believe that if little money is available for an alternative .

Martin



Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:

"Martin Dienert" wrote:
To All: Even at the risk here as a camera film to be verschrien and in the Aiptekschublade to hike, I believe that if little money is available for an alternative.

One does not have to justify, if one has no money (at least not here). There are under warranty a couple of people that with a cheap Aiptek clips better than a few other people with a 15,000-euro Camera.
Only the cheap camera you will always and always willing to compromise or even to compel surrender. The technological disaster, there is sufficient:
Room lighting? The cheap box rises from earlier, picture remains black. Twilight? The Auto Focus is pumping and pumping and do not get a sharp picture out - manual setting without success. Too much light s.Strand? The cheap part makes a relentless over-exposure, because a Graufilter missing. Zoom? Yes, but not during recording. Image stabilization: no difference between one-and off.

For little money would be used a well-preserved for the next class or next to another, I think a better alternative. Photo shops but take the time to pay what, look around in your vicinity.
BG, Andreas



Antwort von Martin Dienert:

Hello,

Quote: For little money would be used a well-preserved for the next class or next to another, I think a better alternative. Photo shops but take the time to pay what, look around in your vicinity.
True, but on ebay, a residual risk remains, in the photo shop is not.

Martin



Antwort von PowerMac:

"rptelevision" wrote: (...)
The points in your list contradict each other even if you get the price with 20 multiplizierst.

I think even with a factor of 200 is still nothing ...



Antwort von Schleichmichel:

Guck you look at the Panasonic SDR-S10 at. This is for the price (239 ¬) are okay, Splash proof (which is now synonymous of Pana one for underwater shots give it) and holding small.

Draws on SD-/SDHC-Karten in MPEG2 format. The advantages and disadvantages have been here several durchmassiert. Just capture. For Internet clips without large claim is very good.

Only remains: For video you need light! For photos, incidentally synonymous, or do you mean, the camera flashes only, so that the photographed people know when to stop with the grin can? And because of the still video image sequence is not much time for the exposure.