Infoseite // With HD video in SD?



Frage von baddimi:


Hello,
I know I have this question for me almost ashamed, but it is not holding me very clearly:
Is it possible with a HD (such as Canon S100 HF) in standard definition film? Or remains the same resolution and it will only reduce the data rate?

I ask because I leave for private recordings and spontanne a small, lightweight and wants to buy. But do I really like my videos, but still not high-end PC to edit HD. This will result in the next few years will probably not change.
The standard definition offering at the moment still really not a good picture quality. That's why I thought if it was possible with an HD cam filming SD, ......

Thank you for your answers,
nice greeting
Dimitrij

Space


Antwort von Shiranai:

No, the only RF S100 offers a Full HD resolution.
The different modes of the Camera (FXP, XP +, etc.) only affect the data rates.

You can of course, the videos simply convert to SD, but that again takes a bit of time.

Space


Antwort von jazzy_d:

This is likely to see above the Cam is synonymous with SD can hold. I would, however, with an HD cam is always in HD. The standard definition offering in this sense never better picture quality. There are solutions, as can be seen in SD cut in HD and then export them. Or until a player option for HD is available in SD and when the export option is simply in the Project by the SD and then replace the HD in HD export. Whether the Canon SD aufnemen can surely is in the manual which you can download.

Space


Antwort von actaion:

yes, it works, but of different model to model.
With a SonySR10 is eg

Space


Antwort von baddimi:

Thanks for the quick reply!
Is it basically the SD HD cameras or film can only offer all the HD resolution?

Space


Antwort von KrischanDO:

Moin,

beware: most of the 1000 ¬ with memory cards in AVCHD to take. Because you need to rapidly cut a quad.

Regards
Christian

Space


Antwort von beiti:

Why the extra charge for an HD model, if you get it initially did not want to exploit? High-tech articles on stocks to buy is not a good idea. The price decline is too fast.

There are, in my view no good reason, a priori of HD to SD runterzuschalten.
Direct shooting with an HD-SD Resolutionist Money and gave away a chance, so the recordings are not synonymous later suddenly high again.

So if you really still want to film in SD, then save at least the purchase and take a pure SD-Model. Until then you take a look at HD, HD is already two generations further developed and / or much cheaper.

Or you look at films in HD and make the only post in SD. Then have at least the raw material into high quality and can see it in a few years ago, if you're better equipped, newly cut again.

Or you use one of the most popular options today, synonymous HD material on weak computers to edit with cut Intermediate Format, or proxy-cut. Even if you currently have no play equipment for HD, you can still ever ready to cut the film in HD archive.

Quote: But do I really like my videos, but still not high-end PC to edit HD. This will result in the next few years will probably not change. Is just me, so I Edius Neo editing program as a concern. This is despite my older computer (Athlon 3500) three options available, the material of my Canon HF100 to edit:
- Convert to a SD format and editing in SD
- Cut in SD and subsequent proxy editing in full HD quality
- Direct editing in HD quality using Canopus HQ codec

Space


Antwort von Axel:

@ beiti
Excellent argues, there is nothing to add.

Space


Antwort von baddimi:

S.alle Thank you!
@ beiti
This can be really nothing more to add.
You've really helped me.
Maybe I will the SONY DCR-DVD510 pick that has a good reputation and for about 300 ¬, it is now good to have. Then I stop at the size of cuts to make, but have good image quality.
And as far as if I am, I get an HD ...

Dimitrij

Space



Space


Antwort von beiti:

"baddimi" wrote: Maybe I will the SONY DCR-DVD510 pick that has a good reputation and for about 300 ¬, it is now good to have. Look at earlier times synonymous to the Canon FS100. Advantages of the Canon: It is smaller, lighter, SD card (instead of expensive Memory Stick) and according to VAD has a slightly better Lowlight quality. And she has no bulky DVD drive (the only place really eats and today no longer is good, because on flash memory film can be much more practical).

Space


Antwort von actaion:

"beiti" wrote: Look at earlier times synonymous to the Canon FS100. Advantages of the Canon: It is smaller, lighter, SD card (instead of expensive Memory Stick) and according to VAD has a slightly better Lowlight quality.
.


Yes, it is smaller and comes a little cheaper.
But has no optical stabilizer, no viable Still Image Resolution, no night shot, no viewfinders, no slow-motion feature, not a front thread for / etc, what the DVD510 has everything.

As for the picture quality is concerned, the Sony test, according to the pictures on video, both active in daylight, as synonymous with artificial clearly ahead of Canon, both in terms of sharpness / details as what color are synonymous. Only with very little light is the image of testing Sonytatsächlich bad. As one would but synonymous in normal use either the candlelight program or slow-shutter night shot or turn on what the test but obviously, in any case when Sony was not made.

Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash