search by a lot of back and forth, I have seen that no hobbyist user software currently supports AVCHD 25p/50p.
Now my question, it is worth to purchase Final Cut Studio, or should we wait for the next version of Express?
Greetings Benjamin
Antwort von Axel:
Maybe that currently do not have 50p AVCHD software for Mac is in, but that does not mean that there are not any.
As one tries to answer the question, has to do depends on how you are defining yourself "hobby". For holiday movies, it's not worth to buy FCS, synonymous, if you get it used for perhaps 600 ¬. In a previous thread you recommended a "real" software was not meant, however, Final Cut Pro, but one that can handle AVCHD natively. Holiday for a film intended sense, if you cut a little, burn a music and put in a Bluray them or something. intended for a SW that can do that, we say Edius or Vegas, but first, a high purchase price as paid and secondly - a new calculator, and although a new PC.
Want more from your video to get would be because Adobe has announced. Considerably more expensive, and now it is: No one in eg After Effects still works with native AVCHD consumer, not honest. So if there should be more: Yes, FCS, still.
Antwort von Ian:
With Adobe Premiere and After Effects CS5 folded editing of AVCHD synonymous with 1080/50 or 60p. To cut enough premiere.
Antwort von NikonUser:
Hi,
thanks for the quick replies. An adaptation of 50p need not necessarily be. My goal is to record some of the camcorder with 50p, the software may already down but the count on 25p. 50p editing would not fix my calculator that is.
I once tried the trial version of Adobe Premiere Elements and probably the only 50i. Final Cut Express expects down anyway, both resolution as synonymous images / second.
For this reason, I'm not sure what price / performance is s.besten Tech. Final Cut Studio so you get a student to a third of the main prize.
Antwort von Axel:
If you have a fairly small or have older Mac and want to keep him there for your needs s.das NLE no alternative to Final Cut Pro. Everything about two GHz, 2 GB Ram and 256 MB graphics added (for Motion and Color) is enough.
Antwort von NikonUser:
So I have an iMac, 2.4 Ghz, 4GB RAM. On the Mac, I think there is no alternative synonymous. I have a PC synonymous, might be able to stop running other synonymous Programs.
Antwort von Axel:
16:10 sounds like the iMac all-aluminum body, which I had once synonymous. If your image is synonymous only 128 MB, you will have real-time limits in the preview and especially in the two programs mentioned synonymous crashes (Apple + S is your friend). I point out a fair way.
Antwort von NikonUser:
ne, I have the normal 24 "inch mac with 256mb graphics. intel processor.
