I have both a Bebob ZOE-DVL as one synonymous Manfrotto 522nd
Rob? - By chance, the Rob (ert), which I have made, together with two teammates in April in Kelkheim? - Grübel * * - Nope, can not really be, who had a camcorder of Panasonic.
... correct - the FB is to the Velbon Tripod.
Why does not fit the Manfrotto Velbon s.das (lever diameter?). I was not aware until now?
This is precisely the point. The Manfrotto Hinterkamerabedienung is against the original lever replaced,
which means of course that the tripod can get in those lever must Avg. Since must Velbon DV -7000 fit, it is too small.
nec - not the Rob from Kelkheim (otherwise I would have been given no notice;)
Thanks for the hint. If this is so, I can look around so only after a ZOE-DVL, the Manfrotto I would really like better.
Are you satisfied with the Zoe-part? Advantages, disadvantages?
The ZOE was my first Lanc control. It is small and light, so that I do together with my video tripod Velbon D-600 is synonymous with taking on holiday. The handling is decent, but I control so that only the zoom. The sharpness in places usaus reasons of habit, I always jump-a camcorder s.der Optics.
On the positive side s.der ZOE also that the terminal has a very large work area, thereby controlling s.vielen different stands can be mounted. Before I bought the Manfrotto Hinterkamerabedienung of which was both ZOE s.Velbon-as synonymous s.Manfrotto-Tripod in use.
The Manfrotto Lanc control I had bought only after I had served time in a borrowed equipment. I find it with the control of Manfrotto easier to control the zoom speed. And since it is well integrated into the lever, I can make it synonymous s.Tripod when I pack in my pocket without fear that protruding parts can break.