Frage von soahC:
Silly question: Can I use a polarizing filter at the same time with my fisheye? if so, how or where does the plofilter on it then?
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
Since I do not know what you have for a fisheye, I can only requires help.
If you no thread s.dem Fisheye (there is a wide angle attachment?) Have, then I recommend the very rare universal adapter of Cokin filters. And since you're obviously very strong in the wide angle, you should resort to the largest possible system.
Gruss
Antwort von soahC:
So, I'll hab nen weitwinkel relatively cheap. which is normally screwed onto the front thread of the cam. Wide angle of the thread itself synonymous has no further forward. therefore ask whether it is even possible to use both? gibts weitwinkel still might have an extra thread for filter??
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
Then my tip with the Cokin Universal Adapter was a hit. He needs no thread.
Antwort von Markus:
Hello,
Alternatively, you might get a camcorder and WW to try out between Spin-on Lenses. If the fisheye was really so cheap, the extra filter, which Picture synonymous not do much. ;-)
Antwort von Ledwig:
Hello,
do not really have the same problem. Have the last few days, the NV-GS500, and wort I like to buy a polarizing filter. My question is this. I described in another thread already that I had severe vignetting if I draufgeldassen the Aperture of the Camera and the Wide AngleObjektiv screw on the Aperture figured out then that there is no problem if you wegschraubt Aperture (synonymous stands in the manual, as I have now seen). Consequently, should be between Camera and Lens WW-nothing that the next WW-Lens forward sets. Since I will probably use the lens anyway outside only) (presumably, have in large (bright, well lit) Aufnhamen, I asked myself whether it makes sense does a polarizing filter in the size of the front threaded lens ring of the SLD-buy, so that the filter directly on the MF-Lens draufsitzt (where I probably would have drauf achten. the side of the filter is not filmed ?!?!?). The front screw is considerably larger than the posterior (s.der Camera, or s.Adapterring). Does that make any sense? Because comparative images which can be found on the Internet, and even extreme! What say you?
 |
Antwort von Markus:
. Does that make any sense? Because comparative images which can be found on the Internet, and even extreme! What say you? You have found comparative images on the net for "polarization filter
between the converter and WW camcorder" and polarizer
"pre WW-converter"? Did you this time a link? Comparison of synonymous I would be interested ...
Antwort von Ledwig:
I have a general comparison of images on the Internet found the same pictures again and again without a polarizing filter with! DA, the difference was clearly recognizable! The thing with the arrangement of components I've just tried to describe plausible, since one ( "intermediate switching" a polarizing filter if that's possible) as in my case described would be likely to vignetting because the lens would be too far forward. But please clarify me on how to use polarizing filters?
Antwort von Markus:
You can unscrew polarizer, both between camcorder and Converter as synonymous to the converter. In both cases, increases the risk of vignetting.
Unless you take a much larger polarization filter, which is clamped by means of carrier in front of the converter that nothing affects the holder of the beam path. I mean, there are of Cokin appropriate accessories.
Antwort von Ledwig:
Yes well ... Then miene presumption was not at all sooo bad .. :) Since I-as described-will do nothing more between Camera and WW, I will probably only left one corresponding filter for the thread of the WW's. Shall I then have to jump once to try and buy at the store if necessary. It is best to use one synonymous around the 43mm camera without a polarizing filter with WW ... But as I said ... I really need it) just for outside (great Aufnhamen. And because the filter is relatv so expensive, I'll only watch once, that I hinbekomme for the Lens!
The frame (Universal holder, etc) where you can make as big filter on it, may really be universal, but too bulky and too delicate for my purposes. But thanks for the hint.
